Die Schwarze Liste der Pestizide - Greenpeace
Die Schwarze Liste der Pestizide - Greenpeace
Die Schwarze Liste der Pestizide - Greenpeace
Sie wollen auch ein ePaper? Erhöhen Sie die Reichweite Ihrer Titel.
YUMPU macht aus Druck-PDFs automatisch weboptimierte ePaper, die Google liebt.
4. Publisher's foreword<br />
<strong>Greenpeace</strong> e.V. – <strong>Die</strong> <strong>Schwarze</strong> <strong>Liste</strong> <strong>der</strong> <strong>Pestizide</strong><br />
<strong>Greenpeace</strong> is active in pressing for the reduction of pesticide contamination, which is often in excess<br />
of what is legally permitted, in food and the environment. It has striven to see there is greater<br />
transparency in the food market and has conducted the biggest independent test programme in<br />
Germany for pesticides in fruit and vegetables. This work has not been in vain. All the big retail<br />
chains in Germany adopted pesticide reduction programmes in 2006 and 2007. By these means<br />
and through action taken by food monitoring and farmers it is hoped contamination by residues and<br />
exceeding of limits will soon be on the wane.<br />
There nonetheless continues to be cause for concern. Numerous, especially hazardous active<br />
substances in pesticides are still being used on a large scale today, contaminating people and the<br />
environment. Substances that can cause cancer, damage genes or disrupt the hormonal balance.<br />
Substances that most consumers would really rather not encounter in their food at all.<br />
<strong>Greenpeace</strong> has for years been calling for such substances to stop being used. This study shows<br />
specifically which of the over a thousand common pesticide agents are among the most dangerous<br />
and have to be replaced as a matter of priority.<br />
In this way the basic principle that food – and as far as possible our environment - should be free<br />
from pesticide residues will not be abandoned. It continues to apply. At the same time, however,<br />
we are calling on all those involved in the chain of food produce to take action not only to minimise<br />
pesticide residues and the use of pesticides but also to press for hazardous pesticide agents to be<br />
substituted. The study is therefore aimed particularly at pesticide producers, users of pesticide, the<br />
food trade, and authorities, consumers and politicians concerned with agriculture.<br />
As the publisher I join with the authors of the study in calling on the EU Commission, EU parliament<br />
and EU member countries for the criteria for evaluating substances drawn up in this study,<br />
and the recommendations on substances made, to be taken into consi<strong>der</strong>ation in the current revision<br />
of EU Directive 91/414/EC on the authorisation of substances in pesticides. Producers, users,<br />
and wholesalers and retailers and others involved in the food-produce chain should all put these<br />
findings and recommendations into practice.<br />
"Blacklists" have been used for years at some supermarket chains, in the UK for example, or by<br />
international organisations like the WHO, and are nothing new in tackling hazardous pesticides.<br />
But there is no such list for Germany and present contamination in Germany. In work which has<br />
taken over seven months, this study closes this gap. Its evaluation was more comprehensive in the<br />
aspects it took into account, and made use of more up-to-date data than most lists known of have<br />
until now.<br />
<strong>Greenpeace</strong> calls on all those involved in the food produce chain:<br />
1. The use and authorisation of the particularly dangerous pesticides listed in the "blacklist" in<br />
this study must be stopped at the earliest possible opportunity. State and private-industry reduction<br />
programmes for pesticides ought to effectively support the substitution of these substances.<br />
Seite 13 von 166