28.02.2013 Views

Handbook of Size Exclusion Chromatography and Related ...

Handbook of Size Exclusion Chromatography and Related ...

Handbook of Size Exclusion Chromatography and Related ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

individual dispersion processes inside <strong>and</strong> outside the column, as shown in<br />

Eq. (21):<br />

s 2 obs ¼s2 col þs2 inj þs2 det þs2 ct<br />

¼s 2 col þ X s 2 ec<br />

(21)<br />

wheres 2 obs istheobservedvarianceoroutputvariance<strong>and</strong>s2 col isthevariancedue<br />

to column b<strong>and</strong> broadening. The other variances represent the contributions from<br />

injector, capillary tubing, <strong>and</strong> detector, respectively, <strong>and</strong> P s2 ec isthe sum <strong>of</strong><br />

extracolumn variances. If needed, Eq. (21) can be extended with other variances,<br />

such as those caused by the electronics <strong>of</strong> the recording system. The validity <strong>of</strong><br />

Eq. (21) is limited to r<strong>and</strong>om dispersion processes that give rise to aGaussian<br />

distribution.Thisconditionisgenerallyassumedinchromatographicapplications.<br />

The equations describing the individual contributions from extracolumn b<strong>and</strong><br />

broadening are discussed in detail elsewhere (106–110).<br />

Although ideally the observed variance is equal to the column variance,<br />

mostHPLCsystemsdetractfromthecolumnefficiency.Equation(22)canbeused<br />

to calculate the importance <strong>of</strong> extracolumn effects:<br />

s 2 obs ¼s2 col þs2 ec<br />

¼s 2 col þu2 s 2 col<br />

(22)<br />

where u 2 isthe fractional increase <strong>of</strong> the columnvariance caused by extracolumn<br />

effects. A10% loss <strong>of</strong> column efficiency (or a5% increase in b<strong>and</strong>width) as a<br />

result <strong>of</strong> extracolumn effects, u 2 ¼0:1, is considered acceptable in practise.<br />

Injection effects as aresult<strong>of</strong> mass <strong>and</strong> volumeoverloadingor the injection<br />

technique can detract from column efficiency.As with other extracolumn effects,<br />

injection effects become more critical with smaller bore columns, which require<br />

smaller injectionvolumes <strong>and</strong> low flow rates; refer to Ref. 109 for adiscussion <strong>of</strong><br />

extracolumn effects in microcolumn systems.<br />

Equation (23) relates the maximum injection volume to the column<br />

dimensions,particlesizedp,mobile-phaseporosityeT,u,<strong>and</strong>reducedplateheight<br />

(110).TheconstantKinjdependsontheinjectiontechnique;K 2 inj ¼12forplugflow<br />

injection<strong>and</strong>variesfrom2to9for mostcommercial injectors (74).Equation(23)<br />

isvalidfor asmallmolecular marker thatelutesinthetotal mobile-phasevolume:<br />

(Vinj) max ¼ 1<br />

4 pKinjeTu(dc) 2 (Lhdp) 1=2<br />

(23)<br />

For areasonably efficient (h ’8) 30 cm 7.5 mm, 10-mm, SEC column,<br />

Eq. (23) predicts amaximum injection volume <strong>of</strong> 165 mL for Kinj ¼3, u 2 ¼0:1,<br />

<strong>and</strong>eT ¼0:8.Figure15showsexperimentaldatafortheeffect<strong>of</strong> injectionvolume<br />

on column efficiency for bovine serum albumin on a 30 cm 7.5 mm, 10-mm,<br />

© 2004 by Marcel Dekker, Inc.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!