28.02.2013 Views

Handbook of Size Exclusion Chromatography and Related ...

Handbook of Size Exclusion Chromatography and Related ...

Handbook of Size Exclusion Chromatography and Related ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

addition, he developed graphical means by which such measurements could be<br />

related directly to the weight-averaged molar mass, the mean-square radius, <strong>and</strong><br />

the second virial coefficient. For the light scattering measurements made at<br />

vanishingly small solute concentrations c, the familiar result <strong>of</strong> Zimm relating the<br />

measurements <strong>of</strong> solute concentration c <strong>and</strong> the excess Rayleigh ratio R(u, c)tothe<br />

derived macromolecular properties is given by<br />

K c<br />

R(u, c) ¼<br />

1<br />

MwP(u) þ 2A2c (1)<br />

where Mw is the weight-average molar mass, P(u) is the scattering form factor,<br />

A2 is the second virial coefficient, <strong>and</strong> K ¼ 4p2 (dn=dc) 2 n2 0 =(Nal4 0 ). Following<br />

separation by SEC, at each slice (collection interval), both the MALS<br />

measurement <strong>and</strong> a concentration measurement [corrected for its corresponding<br />

interdetector volume (13) displacement] are made. The excess Rayleigh ratio<br />

R(u, c) is the ratio <strong>of</strong> the scattered intensity per unit solid angle about the direction<br />

u with respect to the direction <strong>of</strong> the incident beam to the incident light intensity<br />

per unit area.<br />

From Zimm’s graphical methodology, the extrapolated values <strong>of</strong> the left<br />

h<strong>and</strong> side (l.h.s.) <strong>of</strong> Eq. (1) as c ! 0 <strong>and</strong> u ! 0 yielded molar mass directly, since<br />

in this limit, P(u) ¼ 1 <strong>and</strong> the term proportional to A2 vanishes. We may exp<strong>and</strong><br />

Eq. (1) for the case <strong>of</strong> small scattering angle <strong>and</strong> vanishingly small concentrations<br />

to yield<br />

K c<br />

R(u, c) ¼<br />

1<br />

þ 2A2c<br />

MwP(u)<br />

1<br />

Mw<br />

1 þ 16p2 n 2 0<br />

3l 2 0<br />

kr 2 u<br />

gl sin2<br />

2<br />

O sin4 u<br />

2<br />

þ (2)<br />

From Eq. (2) it is easily seen that at these limits, the variation <strong>of</strong> the l.h.s. <strong>of</strong> Eq. (2)<br />

with respect to sin 2 u=2 is16p 2 n 2 0 kr2 g l=(3Mwl 2 0 ), where K ¼ 4p 2 (dn=dc) 2 n 2 0 =<br />

(Nal 4 0 ), l0 is the vacuum wavelength <strong>of</strong> the incident light, Na is Avogadro’s<br />

number, <strong>and</strong> dn is the solution refractive index increment with respect to a<br />

concentration change dc <strong>of</strong> the solute molecules. The mean square radius <strong>of</strong> a<br />

molecule <strong>of</strong> mass M is defined by<br />

kr 2 1<br />

gl ¼<br />

M<br />

ð<br />

r 2 dM (3)<br />

where the integration is over all mass elements <strong>of</strong> the molecule with respect to its<br />

center <strong>of</strong> mass. For the case <strong>of</strong> a distribution <strong>of</strong> molecules, this result is <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

referred to as the z-average mean-square radius. The misnomer radius <strong>of</strong> gyration<br />

© 2004 by Marcel Dekker, Inc.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!