28.02.2013 Views

Handbook of Size Exclusion Chromatography and Related ...

Handbook of Size Exclusion Chromatography and Related ...

Handbook of Size Exclusion Chromatography and Related ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.3 Factors Influencing the MW Determination<br />

3.3.1 MW<strong>and</strong> Chemical Structure <strong>of</strong> St<strong>and</strong>ards<br />

Table 4 shows the average molecular weights <strong>and</strong> polydispersities <strong>of</strong> four<br />

80/20 w/wAM/DMDAAChighMWcopolymers.Itappearsthattheuse<strong>of</strong>poly<br />

(DMDAAC)asast<strong>and</strong>ardresultsinthereporting<strong>of</strong>ahighermolecularweight<strong>and</strong><br />

polydisperity <strong>of</strong> the copolymer. It is also important to note that the chain<br />

microstructure(stereostrucrure,endgroups,ormonomersequencedistribution)<strong>of</strong><br />

apolymer may affect the molecular size when in solution. Every effort should be<br />

made to use apolymer with asimilar chain microstructure for st<strong>and</strong>ardization<br />

when determining MW.Otherwise, erroneous values may be obtained because<br />

eventhoughapolymermayhavethesamechemistry,itmayhaveadifferentchain<br />

microstructure <strong>and</strong> behave differently in solution. When comparing relative MW,<br />

the same MW st<strong>and</strong>ards must be used for all determinations.<br />

3.3.2 MW<strong>and</strong> Calibration Technique<br />

Table 5shows the given M w(determined by LALLS) <strong>and</strong> intrinsic viscosities<br />

determined from an on-line viscometer (Viscotek Model 110) <strong>and</strong> the measured<br />

M wdeterminedbydifferentcalibrationtechniquesforsixsamples.Thedeviations<br />

{[(measured M w given M w)/(given M w)] 100} between the measured M w<br />

<strong>and</strong> those given M wfor PAM are 210 to þ15% by universal calibration <strong>and</strong> 28<br />

to þ4% by peak position calibration. The universal calibration technique gives<br />

relativelyhigherdeviations,probablyduetothefactthattheintrinsicviscositywas<br />

determined from asingle point (58) or the universal calibration curves included<br />

two different types <strong>of</strong> polymers (five PAM <strong>and</strong> one low MW polyacrylic acid) as<br />

shown in Fig. 5, or the polydispersity <strong>of</strong> PAM is not narrow (59). Bose <strong>and</strong><br />

co-workers (60) found that the universal calibrations <strong>of</strong> polystyrene sulfonate <strong>and</strong><br />

dextrans do not coincide. For a 25% hydrolyzed PAM, its absolute M w<br />

Table 4 Molecular Weight <strong>of</strong> 80/20 w/w Acrylamide/DMDAAC Copolymers<br />

Relative to poly(DMDAAC)<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ards<br />

Relative to polyacrylamide<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ards<br />

Sample M w M n M w=M n M w M n M w=M n<br />

Copolymer 1 6.13 10 6<br />

Copolymer 2 7.59 10 4<br />

Copolymer 3 2.66 10 5<br />

Copolymer 4 1.85 10 6<br />

© 2004 by Marcel Dekker, Inc.<br />

1.57 10 6<br />

1.18 10 4<br />

3.13 10 4<br />

8.38 10 4<br />

3.90 3.06 10 6<br />

6.43 7.16 10 4<br />

8.50 1.58 10 5<br />

22.1 8.47 10 5<br />

8.45 10 5<br />

3.48 10 4<br />

6.76 10 4<br />

1.48 10 5<br />

3.62<br />

2.06<br />

2.34<br />

5.72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!