05.03.2013 Views

Organizational Strategy - Sustainable Development - L'Oréal

Organizational Strategy - Sustainable Development - L'Oréal

Organizational Strategy - Sustainable Development - L'Oréal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4 L’OréaL - GrI DaTa SHEETS 2011<br />

4.9<br />

The <strong>Strategy</strong> and <strong>Sustainable</strong> <strong>Development</strong> Committee demonstrates the Board’s determination to ensure that L’Oréal has all of the<br />

means and resources to meet all of the challenges of sustainable growth.<br />

Through its analyses, the Committee clarifies the strategic lines put before the Board and monitors the achievement and development<br />

of significant operations in hand. It monitors the maintenance of major financial balances. In that respect, the Committee examines<br />

outlines, options and strategic projects presented by the Senior Management with their economic and financial consequences, acquisition<br />

opportunities, financial transactions liable to significantly affect the structure of the balance sheet. The Committee also ensures that the<br />

group’s commitments as regards <strong>Sustainable</strong> <strong>Development</strong>, issues specific to the group’s business and aims are fully taken into account. In<br />

that respect, the Committee examines the means and resources employed and reports to the Board.<br />

In 2011, the Committee welcomed a new independent director, Louis Schweitzer, which brought the number of its members to seven. The<br />

Committee is chaired by the Chairman and CEO (Jean-Paul agon), there are two members of the Bettencourt family (Liliane Bettencourt<br />

and Jean-Pierre Meyers), two members are from Nestlé (Peter Brabeck Letmathe and Francisco Castañer Basco) and two independent<br />

directors are also on the Committee (Bernard Kasriel and Louis Schweitzer). all these directors take part in Committee meetings with complete<br />

freedom of judgement and in the interests of all shareholders.<br />

The Committee met five times 2011, with an attendance rate of 92%.<br />

The Committee periodically analysed business in terms of sales and results, and the outlook and development opportunities for the group<br />

and its Divisions as markets and the competition evolve.<br />

Throughout the year, acquisition plans were examined by the Committee before being presented to the Board for a decision. In addition,<br />

the Committee appraised itself of the industrial strategy, especially in New Markets, as part of a process of localising, seeking flexibility<br />

and adapting to local constraints. additionally, at each of its meetings, the Committee examined the latest high added value product<br />

launches in terms of innovation. Lastly, in 2011, the Committee took advantage of the opportunity to have the Company’s <strong>Sustainable</strong><br />

<strong>Development</strong> policy presented and noted that the policy aims to:<br />

• ensure ongoing economic growth, built on a model valuing staff diversity;<br />

• favour ethical, responsible behaviour on a daily basis, and develop new ways as regards sustainable consumption;<br />

• share the group’s development through public spirited actions.<br />

On all its work, the Committee reported to the Board.<br />

> For additional information, see the “2.2.2.1.2. The work of Board of Directors’ Committees” section on pages 43 and 44 of the 2011<br />

reference Document.<br />

4.10<br />

Chairman Jean-Paul aGON (March 2011)<br />

Members Liliane BETTENCOUrT (2004)<br />

Jean-Pierre MEYErS (2004)<br />

Peter BraBECK-LETMaTHE (2005)<br />

Francisco CaSTaNEr-BaSCO (2004)<br />

Bernard KaSrIEL (2004)<br />

Louis SCHWEITZEr (april 2011)<br />

Every year, the Board assesses its composition, organization and the way in which it works. From a summary of prior individual interviews<br />

between the director and the Secretary to the Board, the Board considers routes for progress still possible and, after discussion, took the<br />

improvement measures that it deemed relevant. The assessment is made in accordance with the aFEP-MEDEF Code, to which the Board<br />

refers.<br />

again in 2011, the directors exercised complete freedom of judgement. Their freedom of judgement enables them to play their part,<br />

entirely independently, in the Board’s work and joint decisions and, when applicable, in preparatory work then in proposals by the Board’s<br />

Committees.<br />

The Board was of the opinion that the quality of its meetings, as regards what had been anticipated as routes for progress on completion<br />

of the self-assessment at end of 2010, continues to improve, in particular on the group’s strategic issues which are regularly discussed and<br />

debated, in the presence of management members of the Executive Committee. This year again, the strategic approach was scrutinised<br />

in depth as part of the Board’s work, as regards the development of brands, countries and markets in which the group operates and, in<br />

that respect, the Board’s attention is particularly focused on the major developments in research and Innovation that are at the heart<br />

of the group’s strategy. In 2011, the Board spent an entire day on research at one of its laboratories. L’Oréal’s research is essential to the<br />

group’s growth, through its discoveries, in compliance with quality, safety and efficacy standards and to aid performance for consumers,<br />

wherever they may be in the world. L’Oréal has established an international presence in its research and Innovation activity with five<br />

regional centres: in France, the USa, Japan, China and Brazil.<br />

In 2011, the Board assessed the quantity, frequency and format of information that it is sent as regards the general business and main events<br />

in the life of the group. The provision of documents prior to meetings of the Board or Committees, in accordance with the requirements for<br />

confidentiality and time constraints that the Company is subject to, favours the quality of discussion.<br />

7/13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!