03.04.2013 Views

Archaeoseismology and Palaeoseismology in the Alpine ... - Tierra

Archaeoseismology and Palaeoseismology in the Alpine ... - Tierra

Archaeoseismology and Palaeoseismology in the Alpine ... - Tierra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(e.g. Mula, 1999 or Bullas 2002), show<strong>in</strong>g a potentially<br />

seismic activity <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> region.<br />

SEDIMENTARY AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORD<br />

The general stratigraphic succession of <strong>the</strong> site consists of<br />

a f<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g‐upward cycle, basically beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g with gravels<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or s<strong>and</strong>s of a me<strong>and</strong>er<strong>in</strong>g channel <strong>and</strong> conclud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

with flood‐pla<strong>in</strong> lutites (Figs. 2 <strong>and</strong> 3). The cycle consists<br />

of three <strong>in</strong>tervals, which correspond to fluvial<br />

subenvironments determ<strong>in</strong>ed by sedimentological<br />

analysis. From bottom to top <strong>the</strong> facies association are: 1)<br />

channel fill<strong>in</strong>g, 2) channel ab<strong>and</strong>onment <strong>and</strong> 3) flood<br />

pla<strong>in</strong>. This vertical succession of lithofacies with upward<br />

decreas<strong>in</strong>g energy characterizes sedimentation <strong>in</strong> a<br />

typical me<strong>and</strong>er<strong>in</strong>g‐dom<strong>in</strong>ated flood pla<strong>in</strong>.<br />

The particular sedimentary conditions occurred here have<br />

preserved very well seven anthropogenic layers<br />

<strong>in</strong>tercalated with <strong>the</strong> fluvial deposits (Fig. 3). Each one<br />

was covered by a fluvial flow that has preserved <strong>the</strong><br />

archaeological record, separat<strong>in</strong>g one anthropogenic level<br />

from o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> avoid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> alteration of <strong>the</strong> remnants by<br />

human activity dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> next period.<br />

Human habitat appears controlled by fluvial<br />

environmental evolution: it was sporadic dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

channel work (facies association A <strong>and</strong> B, fig 3) <strong>and</strong> more<br />

<strong>in</strong>tense when rock shelter floor topography was<br />

homogenized at <strong>the</strong> level of <strong>the</strong> flood pla<strong>in</strong> of <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong><br />

channel (facies C).<br />

Fig.2: Ma<strong>in</strong> archaeological trench show<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> habitat levels<br />

(dark) <strong>and</strong> a bed with outsized clasts (MRC, massive rock<br />

collapse). Sedimentological <strong>in</strong>terpretation is showed <strong>in</strong> Fig. 3.<br />

A bed with outsized clasts (MRC level, Figs. 2 <strong>and</strong> 3)<br />

appears <strong>in</strong>tercalated <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>e s<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> lutites of <strong>the</strong> facies<br />

association C, overly<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> N2 anthropogenic layer (5820<br />

+/‐ 50 BP). The bed consists of very angular <strong>and</strong> scattered<br />

cobbles <strong>and</strong> boulders of s<strong>and</strong>y dolostones lack<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ternal<br />

organization. The gra<strong>in</strong> size <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> textural maturity of<br />

<strong>the</strong> clasts are genetically <strong>in</strong>dependent of <strong>the</strong> facies<br />

association C, deposited at lower regime flow <strong>in</strong> a flood‐<br />

pla<strong>in</strong> where <strong>the</strong> bed <strong>in</strong>tercalates. Thus, <strong>the</strong> MRC level is<br />

unconnected with purely fluvial processes. This level<br />

directly overlays <strong>the</strong> N2 level, seal<strong>in</strong>g fire <strong>and</strong> bone‐food<br />

remnants. Scarce artefacts have been found among <strong>the</strong><br />

stones of <strong>the</strong> MRC. The MRC level <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> scarce<br />

anthropogenic rema<strong>in</strong>s are completely covered by <strong>the</strong><br />

next flood s<strong>and</strong> level, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> next occupation level (Ch,<br />

Fig. 2; 3710 +/‐ 40 BP).<br />

1 st INQUA‐IGCP‐567 International Workshop on Earthquake Archaeology <strong>and</strong> <strong>Palaeoseismology</strong>)<br />

130<br />

Fig.3: Detailed stratigraphic column from <strong>the</strong> archaeological site,<br />

with <strong>in</strong>dication of <strong>the</strong> lithofacies <strong>and</strong> facies associations.<br />

The fluvial sediments studied present rounded particles<br />

with an average maximum size of coarse‐gra<strong>in</strong>ed gravel.<br />

Thus, <strong>the</strong> MRC level with pebble‐ <strong>and</strong> cobble‐sized blocks<br />

represents an exceptionally coarse‐gra<strong>in</strong>ed layer. It is<br />

made up of fragmented s<strong>and</strong>y dolomites from <strong>the</strong> walls<br />

<strong>and</strong> roof of <strong>the</strong> rock shelter. Larger fragments are<br />

fractured, though <strong>the</strong>y preserve most of <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al jo<strong>in</strong>ts

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!