03.04.2013 Views

Archaeoseismology and Palaeoseismology in the Alpine ... - Tierra

Archaeoseismology and Palaeoseismology in the Alpine ... - Tierra

Archaeoseismology and Palaeoseismology in the Alpine ... - Tierra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

With<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> FBFZ, <strong>the</strong> Eşen Bas<strong>in</strong> is formed as a ca. 15 km<br />

wide <strong>and</strong> 30 km long, NNE‐trend<strong>in</strong>g extensional graben<br />

beh<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> Lycian Nappes front close to <strong>the</strong> contact with<br />

<strong>the</strong> Beydağları autochthon. The Lycian Nappes basement<br />

consists of ophiolitic rocks, limestones <strong>and</strong> turbiditic<br />

s<strong>and</strong>stones. The bas<strong>in</strong> is bounded <strong>and</strong> transected by a<br />

series of N‐ to NE‐ trend<strong>in</strong>g faults that had exhorted<br />

important control on <strong>the</strong> character <strong>and</strong> distribution of<br />

sedimentary facies s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> Late Miocene.<br />

Historical <strong>and</strong> recent seismic reports show a density of<br />

earthquake‐cluster<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> FBFZ comparable to regions<br />

located along <strong>the</strong> NAF <strong>and</strong> EAF, suggest<strong>in</strong>g it represents a<br />

significant seismic hazard. In spite of this <strong>the</strong> FBFZ is<br />

seismically def<strong>in</strong>ed by weak to moderate (M ≤ 6)<br />

earthquakes only. Important exceptions <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong><br />

nor<strong>the</strong>astern extremity <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> off‐shore southwestern<br />

extremity (Rhodes 1957, off‐shore Turkey 1926, 1969,<br />

1975, 1980, <strong>and</strong> 2001) were large earthquakes have<br />

occurred.<br />

PINARA SITE<br />

The ancient Lycian City of Pınara is located along <strong>the</strong> fault‐<br />

controlled western border of <strong>the</strong> Eşen Bas<strong>in</strong>, near <strong>the</strong><br />

modern village of M<strong>in</strong>are. The archaeological site is<br />

spread over a 3 – 4 km 2 area that <strong>in</strong>cludes a variety of<br />

exposed geological units (Fig. 2A). The basement along<br />

<strong>the</strong> bas<strong>in</strong> marg<strong>in</strong> is characterized by a pre‐Late Miocene<br />

thrust contact between two limestone nappes. This<br />

contact is demarcated by a relatively th<strong>in</strong> flysch unit with<br />

exotic limestone blocks up to 50 m width. From <strong>the</strong> Late<br />

Miocene onward, <strong>the</strong> thrust contact was down‐faulted to<br />

<strong>the</strong> east along a series of sub‐parallel normal faults (Fig.<br />

2B). Just south of Pınara, strongly tilted Upper Miocene<br />

fluvial deposits with <strong>in</strong>termixed breccia levels abut aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

<strong>the</strong> marg<strong>in</strong>al fault <strong>and</strong> are unconformably overla<strong>in</strong> by<br />

Pleistocene terrace deposits.<br />

Fig. 2: Geological map (A) <strong>and</strong> cross section (B) of Pınara ancient<br />

city. 1 – Roman Theatre, 2 – Bath, 3 – Odeon, 4 – Temple, 5 –<br />

Tomb, 6 – Agora, 7 – Necropolis, 8 – Rock Tombs<br />

The largest part of <strong>the</strong> city was built on a down‐faulted<br />

limestone basement block, whereas tombs of <strong>the</strong><br />

Acropolis were ma<strong>in</strong>ly carved <strong>in</strong> a ~80 m high NE‐SW‐<br />

trend<strong>in</strong>g fault face to <strong>the</strong> west (Fig. 2B). No archaeological<br />

1 st INQUA‐IGCP‐567 International Workshop on Earthquake Archaeology <strong>and</strong> <strong>Palaeoseismology</strong><br />

174<br />

rema<strong>in</strong>s are present on <strong>the</strong> basement flysch, which<br />

probably was used for agricultural purposes. The Roman<br />

Theatre was built on a slightly westward‐tilted<br />

Pleistocene terrace that rests on top of <strong>the</strong> flysch.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> ancient records, <strong>the</strong> city of Pınara was<br />

founded by colonists from Xantos between <strong>the</strong> 5th <strong>and</strong><br />

4th century BC. It was one of <strong>the</strong> largest cities <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

powerful Lycian league <strong>and</strong> located along <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> Lycian<br />

road (Akurgal, 1978). In <strong>the</strong> course of time <strong>the</strong> city was<br />

under both Roman <strong>and</strong> Byzant<strong>in</strong>e control. The city was<br />

destroyed by three earthquakes <strong>in</strong> 141 AD (Guidoboni,<br />

1994; Lang, 2003; Akşit, 2006), ~240 AD (Lang, 2003;<br />

Akşit, 2006) <strong>and</strong> 1851 (Soysal et al., 1981). Pınara received<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ancial aid for <strong>the</strong> reconstruction of <strong>the</strong> city after <strong>the</strong><br />

first two earthquakes (Guidoboni, 1994; Lang, 2003; Akşit,<br />

2006). Eventually, <strong>the</strong> city lost its f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>and</strong> geographic<br />

importance <strong>and</strong> at <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> 9th century AD <strong>the</strong> city<br />

was ab<strong>and</strong>oned<br />

The observations <strong>in</strong> Pınara ancient city reveal several<br />

different k<strong>in</strong>ds of damages (Fig. 3). The vertical cracks <strong>and</strong><br />

jo<strong>in</strong>ts of numerous beams, door <strong>and</strong> w<strong>in</strong>dow frames <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> undulated wall relict between Temple to <strong>the</strong> Odeon<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicate horizontal <strong>and</strong> vertical oscillations. The<br />

reconstructed temple wall close to <strong>the</strong> tomb build<strong>in</strong>g<br />

shows that this structure has been destroyed <strong>and</strong> rebuild<br />

at least two times. The slid<strong>in</strong>g of blocks of masonry arch<br />

close to Odeon shows a typical deformation, which has<br />

been <strong>in</strong>terpreted as result<strong>in</strong>g from an earthquake (Marco,<br />

2008; Kamai <strong>and</strong> Hatzor, 2008). Moreover, <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

collapsed edge of <strong>the</strong> Roman <strong>the</strong>atre shows a<br />

characteristic earthquake related U shape gap. The<br />

imbricate arrangements of collapsed blocks <strong>in</strong>dicate rapid<br />

collapse due to seismic activity (S<strong>in</strong>tub<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> Stewart,<br />

2008). Likewise, <strong>the</strong> rotated blocks of <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn w<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>atre are strong <strong>in</strong>dication that <strong>the</strong> damage is<br />

earthquake related.<br />

The detailed assessment of <strong>the</strong> archaeological relicts<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicates that various k<strong>in</strong>ds of damages are of<br />

seismogenic orig<strong>in</strong>. Investigations show also that <strong>the</strong> city<br />

was destroyed several times (Yerli et al., submitted).<br />

A B<br />

C D<br />

E F<br />

Fig. 3: Examples of probably seismic‐related damage <strong>in</strong> Pınara; A‐<br />

rebuild temple wall, B‐ s<strong>in</strong>uously deformed wall with ejected<br />

blocks, C‐ opened vertical jo<strong>in</strong>ts, D‐ “U” shape collapse of<br />

sou<strong>the</strong>rn wall of Roman Theatre, E‐ vertical undulation structure

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!