Archaeoseismology and Palaeoseismology in the Alpine ... - Tierra
Archaeoseismology and Palaeoseismology in the Alpine ... - Tierra
Archaeoseismology and Palaeoseismology in the Alpine ... - Tierra
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
With<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> FBFZ, <strong>the</strong> Eşen Bas<strong>in</strong> is formed as a ca. 15 km<br />
wide <strong>and</strong> 30 km long, NNE‐trend<strong>in</strong>g extensional graben<br />
beh<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> Lycian Nappes front close to <strong>the</strong> contact with<br />
<strong>the</strong> Beydağları autochthon. The Lycian Nappes basement<br />
consists of ophiolitic rocks, limestones <strong>and</strong> turbiditic<br />
s<strong>and</strong>stones. The bas<strong>in</strong> is bounded <strong>and</strong> transected by a<br />
series of N‐ to NE‐ trend<strong>in</strong>g faults that had exhorted<br />
important control on <strong>the</strong> character <strong>and</strong> distribution of<br />
sedimentary facies s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> Late Miocene.<br />
Historical <strong>and</strong> recent seismic reports show a density of<br />
earthquake‐cluster<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> FBFZ comparable to regions<br />
located along <strong>the</strong> NAF <strong>and</strong> EAF, suggest<strong>in</strong>g it represents a<br />
significant seismic hazard. In spite of this <strong>the</strong> FBFZ is<br />
seismically def<strong>in</strong>ed by weak to moderate (M ≤ 6)<br />
earthquakes only. Important exceptions <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong><br />
nor<strong>the</strong>astern extremity <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> off‐shore southwestern<br />
extremity (Rhodes 1957, off‐shore Turkey 1926, 1969,<br />
1975, 1980, <strong>and</strong> 2001) were large earthquakes have<br />
occurred.<br />
PINARA SITE<br />
The ancient Lycian City of Pınara is located along <strong>the</strong> fault‐<br />
controlled western border of <strong>the</strong> Eşen Bas<strong>in</strong>, near <strong>the</strong><br />
modern village of M<strong>in</strong>are. The archaeological site is<br />
spread over a 3 – 4 km 2 area that <strong>in</strong>cludes a variety of<br />
exposed geological units (Fig. 2A). The basement along<br />
<strong>the</strong> bas<strong>in</strong> marg<strong>in</strong> is characterized by a pre‐Late Miocene<br />
thrust contact between two limestone nappes. This<br />
contact is demarcated by a relatively th<strong>in</strong> flysch unit with<br />
exotic limestone blocks up to 50 m width. From <strong>the</strong> Late<br />
Miocene onward, <strong>the</strong> thrust contact was down‐faulted to<br />
<strong>the</strong> east along a series of sub‐parallel normal faults (Fig.<br />
2B). Just south of Pınara, strongly tilted Upper Miocene<br />
fluvial deposits with <strong>in</strong>termixed breccia levels abut aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />
<strong>the</strong> marg<strong>in</strong>al fault <strong>and</strong> are unconformably overla<strong>in</strong> by<br />
Pleistocene terrace deposits.<br />
Fig. 2: Geological map (A) <strong>and</strong> cross section (B) of Pınara ancient<br />
city. 1 – Roman Theatre, 2 – Bath, 3 – Odeon, 4 – Temple, 5 –<br />
Tomb, 6 – Agora, 7 – Necropolis, 8 – Rock Tombs<br />
The largest part of <strong>the</strong> city was built on a down‐faulted<br />
limestone basement block, whereas tombs of <strong>the</strong><br />
Acropolis were ma<strong>in</strong>ly carved <strong>in</strong> a ~80 m high NE‐SW‐<br />
trend<strong>in</strong>g fault face to <strong>the</strong> west (Fig. 2B). No archaeological<br />
1 st INQUA‐IGCP‐567 International Workshop on Earthquake Archaeology <strong>and</strong> <strong>Palaeoseismology</strong><br />
174<br />
rema<strong>in</strong>s are present on <strong>the</strong> basement flysch, which<br />
probably was used for agricultural purposes. The Roman<br />
Theatre was built on a slightly westward‐tilted<br />
Pleistocene terrace that rests on top of <strong>the</strong> flysch.<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> ancient records, <strong>the</strong> city of Pınara was<br />
founded by colonists from Xantos between <strong>the</strong> 5th <strong>and</strong><br />
4th century BC. It was one of <strong>the</strong> largest cities <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
powerful Lycian league <strong>and</strong> located along <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> Lycian<br />
road (Akurgal, 1978). In <strong>the</strong> course of time <strong>the</strong> city was<br />
under both Roman <strong>and</strong> Byzant<strong>in</strong>e control. The city was<br />
destroyed by three earthquakes <strong>in</strong> 141 AD (Guidoboni,<br />
1994; Lang, 2003; Akşit, 2006), ~240 AD (Lang, 2003;<br />
Akşit, 2006) <strong>and</strong> 1851 (Soysal et al., 1981). Pınara received<br />
f<strong>in</strong>ancial aid for <strong>the</strong> reconstruction of <strong>the</strong> city after <strong>the</strong><br />
first two earthquakes (Guidoboni, 1994; Lang, 2003; Akşit,<br />
2006). Eventually, <strong>the</strong> city lost its f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>and</strong> geographic<br />
importance <strong>and</strong> at <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> 9th century AD <strong>the</strong> city<br />
was ab<strong>and</strong>oned<br />
The observations <strong>in</strong> Pınara ancient city reveal several<br />
different k<strong>in</strong>ds of damages (Fig. 3). The vertical cracks <strong>and</strong><br />
jo<strong>in</strong>ts of numerous beams, door <strong>and</strong> w<strong>in</strong>dow frames <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> undulated wall relict between Temple to <strong>the</strong> Odeon<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicate horizontal <strong>and</strong> vertical oscillations. The<br />
reconstructed temple wall close to <strong>the</strong> tomb build<strong>in</strong>g<br />
shows that this structure has been destroyed <strong>and</strong> rebuild<br />
at least two times. The slid<strong>in</strong>g of blocks of masonry arch<br />
close to Odeon shows a typical deformation, which has<br />
been <strong>in</strong>terpreted as result<strong>in</strong>g from an earthquake (Marco,<br />
2008; Kamai <strong>and</strong> Hatzor, 2008). Moreover, <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn<br />
collapsed edge of <strong>the</strong> Roman <strong>the</strong>atre shows a<br />
characteristic earthquake related U shape gap. The<br />
imbricate arrangements of collapsed blocks <strong>in</strong>dicate rapid<br />
collapse due to seismic activity (S<strong>in</strong>tub<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> Stewart,<br />
2008). Likewise, <strong>the</strong> rotated blocks of <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn w<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>atre are strong <strong>in</strong>dication that <strong>the</strong> damage is<br />
earthquake related.<br />
The detailed assessment of <strong>the</strong> archaeological relicts<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicates that various k<strong>in</strong>ds of damages are of<br />
seismogenic orig<strong>in</strong>. Investigations show also that <strong>the</strong> city<br />
was destroyed several times (Yerli et al., submitted).<br />
A B<br />
C D<br />
E F<br />
Fig. 3: Examples of probably seismic‐related damage <strong>in</strong> Pınara; A‐<br />
rebuild temple wall, B‐ s<strong>in</strong>uously deformed wall with ejected<br />
blocks, C‐ opened vertical jo<strong>in</strong>ts, D‐ “U” shape collapse of<br />
sou<strong>the</strong>rn wall of Roman Theatre, E‐ vertical undulation structure