03.04.2013 Views

Archaeoseismology and Palaeoseismology in the Alpine ... - Tierra

Archaeoseismology and Palaeoseismology in the Alpine ... - Tierra

Archaeoseismology and Palaeoseismology in the Alpine ... - Tierra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

to 400 m) <strong>the</strong> calculated values for angle of reach <strong>and</strong><br />

shadow angle did not fit <strong>the</strong> usual ranges, especially on<br />

<strong>the</strong> SW‐flank of <strong>the</strong> San Bartolomé mounta<strong>in</strong> ridge, see<br />

white background <strong>in</strong> Fig. 4.<br />

Fig. 3: Angle of reach (β) <strong>and</strong> shadow angle (α) accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to Evans <strong>and</strong> Hungr (1993) with source zone A, talus slope B <strong>and</strong><br />

shadow C.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, a numerical trajectory based model, <strong>the</strong><br />

computer programme Rockfall 6.1 was used for runout<br />

analysis. Rockfall 6.1 enables <strong>the</strong> simulation of <strong>the</strong> fall of<br />

rocks down a two‐dimensional slope with certa<strong>in</strong> surface<br />

conditions (Spang 1995; Spang 2001). The programme<br />

computes <strong>the</strong> rock fall path, total k<strong>in</strong>etic energy, bounce<br />

heights <strong>and</strong> runout distances.<br />

The simulation was performed for several slope profiles<br />

on both sides of <strong>the</strong> mounta<strong>in</strong> under recent surface<br />

conditions (covered soil) <strong>and</strong> under extreme conditions<br />

1 st INQUA‐IGCP‐567 International Workshop on Earthquake Archaeology <strong>and</strong> <strong>Palaeoseismology</strong>)<br />

53<br />

Fig. 4: Calculated shadow angles with m<strong>in</strong>imum shadow angles<br />

(bare rock). The slope profiles were identified with GIS by<br />

extract<strong>in</strong>g steepest paths from a digital elevation model.<br />

The results of <strong>the</strong> simulation under recent conditions are<br />

shown <strong>in</strong> Fig. 5. The simulation fits very well <strong>the</strong><br />

depositions on <strong>the</strong> east flank <strong>and</strong> on <strong>the</strong> NW‐flank of <strong>the</strong><br />

San Bartolomé mounta<strong>in</strong> ridge. Aga<strong>in</strong>, <strong>the</strong> areas with<br />

large travel distances on <strong>the</strong> SW‐flank mark an exception.<br />

Even under extreme conditions <strong>the</strong> simulation does not<br />

achieve <strong>the</strong> runout distances of <strong>the</strong> depositions.<br />

Fig. 5: The results of <strong>the</strong> numerical rockfall simulation with Rockfall 6.1 under recent conditions.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!