Archaeoseismology and Palaeoseismology in the Alpine ... - Tierra
Archaeoseismology and Palaeoseismology in the Alpine ... - Tierra
Archaeoseismology and Palaeoseismology in the Alpine ... - Tierra
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
to 400 m) <strong>the</strong> calculated values for angle of reach <strong>and</strong><br />
shadow angle did not fit <strong>the</strong> usual ranges, especially on<br />
<strong>the</strong> SW‐flank of <strong>the</strong> San Bartolomé mounta<strong>in</strong> ridge, see<br />
white background <strong>in</strong> Fig. 4.<br />
Fig. 3: Angle of reach (β) <strong>and</strong> shadow angle (α) accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to Evans <strong>and</strong> Hungr (1993) with source zone A, talus slope B <strong>and</strong><br />
shadow C.<br />
Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, a numerical trajectory based model, <strong>the</strong><br />
computer programme Rockfall 6.1 was used for runout<br />
analysis. Rockfall 6.1 enables <strong>the</strong> simulation of <strong>the</strong> fall of<br />
rocks down a two‐dimensional slope with certa<strong>in</strong> surface<br />
conditions (Spang 1995; Spang 2001). The programme<br />
computes <strong>the</strong> rock fall path, total k<strong>in</strong>etic energy, bounce<br />
heights <strong>and</strong> runout distances.<br />
The simulation was performed for several slope profiles<br />
on both sides of <strong>the</strong> mounta<strong>in</strong> under recent surface<br />
conditions (covered soil) <strong>and</strong> under extreme conditions<br />
1 st INQUA‐IGCP‐567 International Workshop on Earthquake Archaeology <strong>and</strong> <strong>Palaeoseismology</strong>)<br />
53<br />
Fig. 4: Calculated shadow angles with m<strong>in</strong>imum shadow angles<br />
(bare rock). The slope profiles were identified with GIS by<br />
extract<strong>in</strong>g steepest paths from a digital elevation model.<br />
The results of <strong>the</strong> simulation under recent conditions are<br />
shown <strong>in</strong> Fig. 5. The simulation fits very well <strong>the</strong><br />
depositions on <strong>the</strong> east flank <strong>and</strong> on <strong>the</strong> NW‐flank of <strong>the</strong><br />
San Bartolomé mounta<strong>in</strong> ridge. Aga<strong>in</strong>, <strong>the</strong> areas with<br />
large travel distances on <strong>the</strong> SW‐flank mark an exception.<br />
Even under extreme conditions <strong>the</strong> simulation does not<br />
achieve <strong>the</strong> runout distances of <strong>the</strong> depositions.<br />
Fig. 5: The results of <strong>the</strong> numerical rockfall simulation with Rockfall 6.1 under recent conditions.