Archaeoseismology and Palaeoseismology in the Alpine ... - Tierra
Archaeoseismology and Palaeoseismology in the Alpine ... - Tierra
Archaeoseismology and Palaeoseismology in the Alpine ... - Tierra
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1 st INQUA‐IGCP‐567 International Workshop on Earthquake Archaeology <strong>and</strong> <strong>Palaeoseismology</strong>)<br />
LIQUEFACTION AS EVIDENCE OF PALEOSEISMICS<br />
95<br />
N.A. Mörner (1)<br />
(1) Paleogeophysics & Geodynamics, Rösundavägen 17, 13336 Saltsjöbaden, SWEDEN. morner@pog.nu<br />
Abstract: The process of liquefaction is an important factor <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> study of paleoseismics. It starts to form at earthquake magnitudes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
order of 5–5.5. The spatial distribution of a s<strong>in</strong>gle liquefaction event is related to <strong>the</strong> magnitude of <strong>the</strong> event. Therefore, a key issue <strong>in</strong><br />
paleoseismology is to identify <strong>and</strong> date liquefaction structures to separate events. The type of structure, <strong>the</strong> size of structures <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> material<br />
<strong>in</strong> liquefaction <strong>and</strong> vent<strong>in</strong>g are o<strong>the</strong>r key issues <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> registration of past liquefaction events. Recently, we have been able to identify multiple<br />
phases of liquefaction events. They are <strong>in</strong>terpreted <strong>in</strong> terms of shocks <strong>and</strong> after‐shocks. Liquefaction structures are identified globally <strong>and</strong> all<br />
throughout geological time. The present paper, however, is strongly focused on liquefaction events <strong>in</strong> glacial to postglacial sediments <strong>in</strong><br />
Sweden, where <strong>the</strong>y are also l<strong>in</strong>ked to faults, fractures, slides <strong>and</strong> tsunami events. Often <strong>the</strong>y were dated to a s<strong>in</strong>gle varve year.<br />
Key words: Liquefaction, dat<strong>in</strong>g, spatial distribution, multiple phases.<br />
LIQUEFACTION<br />
The phenomenon of ”liquefaction” refers to <strong>the</strong> process<br />
where a sediment layer or a part of a sediment layer is<br />
transformed <strong>in</strong>to a fluid or fluidized stage (from Lat<strong>in</strong>:<br />
lique facere). This occurs post‐depositionally (sometimes<br />
also “synsedimentary”). There are different ways of<br />
generat<strong>in</strong>g liquefaction. The most common process is<br />
earthquake shak<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
The shak<strong>in</strong>g motions at an earthquake may lead to a<br />
reorganisation of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternal distribution of gra<strong>in</strong>s <strong>and</strong><br />
water so that <strong>the</strong> sediment becomes fluid. This makes<br />
deposits of s<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> course silt most susceptible for<br />
liquefaction. Also, f<strong>in</strong>e gravel may fairly easily become<br />
liquefied. Courser <strong>and</strong> f<strong>in</strong>er sediments (course gravel to<br />
pebbles <strong>and</strong> clay to f<strong>in</strong>e silt) liquefaction only occurs<br />
rarely <strong>and</strong> under special conditions. The postdepositional<br />
liquefaction of a stratified s<strong>and</strong>y bed implies that <strong>the</strong><br />
orig<strong>in</strong>al stratification becomes totally or partly erased <strong>in</strong>to<br />
a structureless bed (Fig. 1). By magnetic methods, we<br />
have shown that also clay <strong>and</strong> f<strong>in</strong>e silt beds may be<br />
subjected to an <strong>in</strong>ternal liquefaction (Mörner <strong>and</strong> Sun,<br />
2008).<br />
Fig. 1: The primary bedd<strong>in</strong>g (A) has become erased by<br />
liquefaction <strong>in</strong>to a structureless bed (B). Beds C <strong>and</strong> D of<br />
structureless s<strong>and</strong> refer to a 2 nd <strong>and</strong> 3 rd phase of liquefaction<br />
with vent<strong>in</strong>g (from Mörner, 2003; site Olivelund). This event is<br />
dated at <strong>the</strong> autumn of varve 10,430 BP.<br />
A liquefied bed will behave like a “heavy fluid” – allow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
big blocks <strong>and</strong> eroded fragments to “swim” <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
liquefied bed (Fig. 2). This also opens for density<br />
redistribution – heavy beds s<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g down <strong>and</strong> lighter beds<br />
flam<strong>in</strong>g upwards (Fig. 3). This also leads to vent<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
liquefied material <strong>and</strong> formation of mud‐volcanoes. The<br />
size of vent<strong>in</strong>g structures <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> material to become<br />
vented are strongly l<strong>in</strong>ked to <strong>the</strong> magnitude of<br />
earthquake.<br />
Fig. 2: Liquefied s<strong>and</strong> behav<strong>in</strong>g like a “heavy fluid, <strong>in</strong> which<br />
blocks may “swim” (from Mörner, 2003; site: Olivelund).<br />
Fig. 3: Five sedimentary cycles (A‐E) affected by post‐<br />
depositional liquefaction <strong>in</strong> varve year 9428 BP caus<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
f<strong>in</strong>e sediments to flame upwards <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> course sediments to<br />
s<strong>in</strong>k downwards (from Mörner, 2003; site Rödbäck).<br />
Liquefaction may strike a stratified sedimentary bed quite<br />
differently; strongly deform<strong>in</strong>g some beds <strong>and</strong> leav<strong>in</strong>g<br />
o<strong>the</strong>rs virtually unaffected (Fig. 4).