03.04.2013 Views

Archaeoseismology and Palaeoseismology in the Alpine ... - Tierra

Archaeoseismology and Palaeoseismology in the Alpine ... - Tierra

Archaeoseismology and Palaeoseismology in the Alpine ... - Tierra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore this region <strong>in</strong> central Greece undergoes a<br />

rapid ma<strong>in</strong> extension <strong>in</strong> N‐S direction with approximately<br />

6‐15 mm/a (Kokkalas et al., 2007b). The Kaparelli fault is<br />

an active normal limestone fault scarp with a height of<br />

about 3 ‐ 5 m. The last major earthquake occurred <strong>in</strong><br />

w<strong>in</strong>ter 1981. Three events with magnitudes greater than<br />

6 were measured. Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> night of <strong>the</strong> 24 th ‐25 th<br />

February <strong>the</strong> fist two events had a magnitude of 6.7 <strong>and</strong><br />

6.4 <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> third event on <strong>the</strong> 4 th March reached<br />

magnitude 6.3 (Hubert et al., 1996). After those events 2‐<br />

D roughness analyses (Stewart, 1996), cosmogenic dat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(Benedetti et al., 2003), trench<strong>in</strong>g (Kokkalas et al., 2007)<br />

<strong>and</strong> deformation monitor<strong>in</strong>g by us<strong>in</strong>g a dense network of<br />

Fig. 3: A) The sou<strong>the</strong>rn segment of <strong>the</strong> Kaparelli fault.<br />

B) One scan position <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> scarp layout<br />

non‐permanent GPS stations <strong>and</strong> extensometers (Ganas<br />

et al. 2007) have been carried out especially on <strong>the</strong><br />

Kaparelli fault. Benedetti et al. (2003) assumed three<br />

events from his cosmogenic dat<strong>in</strong>g. The results give<br />

evidence for events at 20±3 ka, 14.5±0.5 ka <strong>and</strong> 10.5±0.5<br />

ka. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to that <strong>the</strong> time <strong>in</strong>tervals between slip<br />

events are 3000‐9000 years, 4000‐5000 years <strong>and</strong> 10000‐<br />

11000 years. Kokkalas et al. (2007) results of <strong>the</strong> trench<br />

show aga<strong>in</strong> three events at around 7.5 ka, 5.8 ka <strong>and</strong> 1.4<br />

ka. So that now seven events <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> 1981<br />

earthquake are proposed<br />

FUNDAMENTALS OF LIDAR<br />

The terrestrial laser scann<strong>in</strong>g (TLS) was established as a<br />

good data acquisition <strong>in</strong> geoscience <strong>and</strong> geological<br />

eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> difficult accessible areas. As <strong>the</strong> TLS has a<br />

high spatial <strong>and</strong> temporal resolution it is an effective<br />

remote sens<strong>in</strong>g technology for reconstruction, monitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>and</strong> observation of mass movement phenomena <strong>and</strong><br />

related hazards. The raw po<strong>in</strong>t cloud dataset <strong>in</strong>cludes <strong>the</strong><br />

distance between object <strong>and</strong> TLS, <strong>the</strong> x‐, y‐ <strong>and</strong> z‐<br />

coord<strong>in</strong>ates <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> received <strong>in</strong>tensity. With <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrated digital camera <strong>the</strong> panchromatic <strong>in</strong>formation is<br />

recorded. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g capabilities of TLS <strong>in</strong><br />

geosciences are based <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area‐measured data <strong>in</strong><br />

safety range (> 600m). Successful <strong>in</strong>vestigations <strong>in</strong><br />

geosciences with TLS were published by e.g. Kuhn &<br />

Prüfer (2007) for mass movement observation on <strong>the</strong><br />

isl<strong>and</strong> Rügen, Travelletti et al. (2008) for l<strong>and</strong>slide<br />

monitor<strong>in</strong>g, Rabatel et. al. (2008) for mass balance of<br />

rockfall <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Alps or by Slob et. al. (2007) for fracture<br />

systems. The fundamental pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of LiDAR (Light<br />

1 st INQUA‐IGCP‐567 International Workshop on Earthquake Archaeology <strong>and</strong> <strong>Palaeoseismology</strong><br />

170<br />

Detection And Rang<strong>in</strong>g) is to generate coherent laser<br />

beam with little beam divergence by stimulated emission.<br />

The electromagnetic waves are reflected by surfaces <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> receiver detects portions of <strong>the</strong> backscattered signal.<br />

Fig. 4: The terrestrial laser scanner ILRIS 3D from Optech <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

field<br />

The laser rang<strong>in</strong>g system is based on measur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> time‐<br />

of‐flight of <strong>the</strong> short laser signal. The range or distance to<br />

<strong>the</strong> target is calculated from <strong>the</strong> time elapse of <strong>the</strong> pulse<br />

between <strong>the</strong> transmitter <strong>and</strong> receiver, <strong>and</strong>, <strong>the</strong> speed of<br />

<strong>the</strong> laser pulse. For <strong>the</strong> pulse detection <strong>the</strong> first pulse, <strong>the</strong><br />

last pulse or <strong>the</strong> strongest pulse can be selected. In our<br />

case we used <strong>the</strong> TLS ILRIS‐3D from Optech Inc., Ontario,<br />

CA (Fig.4). The technical Data of ILRIS‐3D show table1.<br />

Table 1: Technical Data<br />

Data sampl<strong>in</strong>g rate 2500 po<strong>in</strong>ts per sec.<br />

Beam divergence 0.00974°<br />

M<strong>in</strong>imum spot step 0.00115°<br />

Laser wavelength 1500nm<br />

Raw range accurancy 7mm @ 100m<br />

Raw positional accurancy 8mm @ 100m<br />

Digital camera Integrated digital<br />

camera<br />

Scanner field of view 40° x 40°<br />

DATA ACQUISITION AND FIRST RESULTS<br />

Major aims of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigation were to f<strong>in</strong>d quantitative<br />

<strong>and</strong> qualitative data for <strong>the</strong> reconstruction of surfaces <strong>and</strong><br />

to analyze <strong>the</strong> tectonic geomorphology <strong>and</strong><br />

paleoseismology of active faults with TLS to reconstruct<br />

fault history <strong>and</strong> activity along surface ruptur<strong>in</strong>g scarps. In<br />

this context, <strong>the</strong> detailed structural analysis of rock<br />

surfaces is fundamental <strong>and</strong> can be realized by a HRDEM.<br />

The scarp surface was scanned where Benedetti et al.<br />

(2003) took samples for <strong>the</strong> cosmogenic dat<strong>in</strong>g method<br />

(Fig. 3B). For high quality data, <strong>the</strong> terrestrial laser<br />

scanner should detect <strong>the</strong> object from different po<strong>in</strong>ts of<br />

view. Hence a relative complete po<strong>in</strong>t cloud can be<br />

produced. In this case we have four scan positions with<br />

eleven scan w<strong>in</strong>dows for <strong>the</strong> circa 35m long scarp. The<br />

density of po<strong>in</strong>ts by <strong>the</strong> scans ranges between 1mm to<br />

5.1mm.<br />

The scan sequence is composed of approximately 94<br />

million po<strong>in</strong>ts.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!