Archaeoseismology and Palaeoseismology in the Alpine ... - Tierra
Archaeoseismology and Palaeoseismology in the Alpine ... - Tierra
Archaeoseismology and Palaeoseismology in the Alpine ... - Tierra
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore this region <strong>in</strong> central Greece undergoes a<br />
rapid ma<strong>in</strong> extension <strong>in</strong> N‐S direction with approximately<br />
6‐15 mm/a (Kokkalas et al., 2007b). The Kaparelli fault is<br />
an active normal limestone fault scarp with a height of<br />
about 3 ‐ 5 m. The last major earthquake occurred <strong>in</strong><br />
w<strong>in</strong>ter 1981. Three events with magnitudes greater than<br />
6 were measured. Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> night of <strong>the</strong> 24 th ‐25 th<br />
February <strong>the</strong> fist two events had a magnitude of 6.7 <strong>and</strong><br />
6.4 <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> third event on <strong>the</strong> 4 th March reached<br />
magnitude 6.3 (Hubert et al., 1996). After those events 2‐<br />
D roughness analyses (Stewart, 1996), cosmogenic dat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
(Benedetti et al., 2003), trench<strong>in</strong>g (Kokkalas et al., 2007)<br />
<strong>and</strong> deformation monitor<strong>in</strong>g by us<strong>in</strong>g a dense network of<br />
Fig. 3: A) The sou<strong>the</strong>rn segment of <strong>the</strong> Kaparelli fault.<br />
B) One scan position <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> scarp layout<br />
non‐permanent GPS stations <strong>and</strong> extensometers (Ganas<br />
et al. 2007) have been carried out especially on <strong>the</strong><br />
Kaparelli fault. Benedetti et al. (2003) assumed three<br />
events from his cosmogenic dat<strong>in</strong>g. The results give<br />
evidence for events at 20±3 ka, 14.5±0.5 ka <strong>and</strong> 10.5±0.5<br />
ka. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to that <strong>the</strong> time <strong>in</strong>tervals between slip<br />
events are 3000‐9000 years, 4000‐5000 years <strong>and</strong> 10000‐<br />
11000 years. Kokkalas et al. (2007) results of <strong>the</strong> trench<br />
show aga<strong>in</strong> three events at around 7.5 ka, 5.8 ka <strong>and</strong> 1.4<br />
ka. So that now seven events <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> 1981<br />
earthquake are proposed<br />
FUNDAMENTALS OF LIDAR<br />
The terrestrial laser scann<strong>in</strong>g (TLS) was established as a<br />
good data acquisition <strong>in</strong> geoscience <strong>and</strong> geological<br />
eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> difficult accessible areas. As <strong>the</strong> TLS has a<br />
high spatial <strong>and</strong> temporal resolution it is an effective<br />
remote sens<strong>in</strong>g technology for reconstruction, monitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>and</strong> observation of mass movement phenomena <strong>and</strong><br />
related hazards. The raw po<strong>in</strong>t cloud dataset <strong>in</strong>cludes <strong>the</strong><br />
distance between object <strong>and</strong> TLS, <strong>the</strong> x‐, y‐ <strong>and</strong> z‐<br />
coord<strong>in</strong>ates <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> received <strong>in</strong>tensity. With <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>tegrated digital camera <strong>the</strong> panchromatic <strong>in</strong>formation is<br />
recorded. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g capabilities of TLS <strong>in</strong><br />
geosciences are based <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area‐measured data <strong>in</strong><br />
safety range (> 600m). Successful <strong>in</strong>vestigations <strong>in</strong><br />
geosciences with TLS were published by e.g. Kuhn &<br />
Prüfer (2007) for mass movement observation on <strong>the</strong><br />
isl<strong>and</strong> Rügen, Travelletti et al. (2008) for l<strong>and</strong>slide<br />
monitor<strong>in</strong>g, Rabatel et. al. (2008) for mass balance of<br />
rockfall <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Alps or by Slob et. al. (2007) for fracture<br />
systems. The fundamental pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of LiDAR (Light<br />
1 st INQUA‐IGCP‐567 International Workshop on Earthquake Archaeology <strong>and</strong> <strong>Palaeoseismology</strong><br />
170<br />
Detection And Rang<strong>in</strong>g) is to generate coherent laser<br />
beam with little beam divergence by stimulated emission.<br />
The electromagnetic waves are reflected by surfaces <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> receiver detects portions of <strong>the</strong> backscattered signal.<br />
Fig. 4: The terrestrial laser scanner ILRIS 3D from Optech <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
field<br />
The laser rang<strong>in</strong>g system is based on measur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> time‐<br />
of‐flight of <strong>the</strong> short laser signal. The range or distance to<br />
<strong>the</strong> target is calculated from <strong>the</strong> time elapse of <strong>the</strong> pulse<br />
between <strong>the</strong> transmitter <strong>and</strong> receiver, <strong>and</strong>, <strong>the</strong> speed of<br />
<strong>the</strong> laser pulse. For <strong>the</strong> pulse detection <strong>the</strong> first pulse, <strong>the</strong><br />
last pulse or <strong>the</strong> strongest pulse can be selected. In our<br />
case we used <strong>the</strong> TLS ILRIS‐3D from Optech Inc., Ontario,<br />
CA (Fig.4). The technical Data of ILRIS‐3D show table1.<br />
Table 1: Technical Data<br />
Data sampl<strong>in</strong>g rate 2500 po<strong>in</strong>ts per sec.<br />
Beam divergence 0.00974°<br />
M<strong>in</strong>imum spot step 0.00115°<br />
Laser wavelength 1500nm<br />
Raw range accurancy 7mm @ 100m<br />
Raw positional accurancy 8mm @ 100m<br />
Digital camera Integrated digital<br />
camera<br />
Scanner field of view 40° x 40°<br />
DATA ACQUISITION AND FIRST RESULTS<br />
Major aims of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigation were to f<strong>in</strong>d quantitative<br />
<strong>and</strong> qualitative data for <strong>the</strong> reconstruction of surfaces <strong>and</strong><br />
to analyze <strong>the</strong> tectonic geomorphology <strong>and</strong><br />
paleoseismology of active faults with TLS to reconstruct<br />
fault history <strong>and</strong> activity along surface ruptur<strong>in</strong>g scarps. In<br />
this context, <strong>the</strong> detailed structural analysis of rock<br />
surfaces is fundamental <strong>and</strong> can be realized by a HRDEM.<br />
The scarp surface was scanned where Benedetti et al.<br />
(2003) took samples for <strong>the</strong> cosmogenic dat<strong>in</strong>g method<br />
(Fig. 3B). For high quality data, <strong>the</strong> terrestrial laser<br />
scanner should detect <strong>the</strong> object from different po<strong>in</strong>ts of<br />
view. Hence a relative complete po<strong>in</strong>t cloud can be<br />
produced. In this case we have four scan positions with<br />
eleven scan w<strong>in</strong>dows for <strong>the</strong> circa 35m long scarp. The<br />
density of po<strong>in</strong>ts by <strong>the</strong> scans ranges between 1mm to<br />
5.1mm.<br />
The scan sequence is composed of approximately 94<br />
million po<strong>in</strong>ts.