Archaeoseismology and Palaeoseismology in the Alpine ... - Tierra
Archaeoseismology and Palaeoseismology in the Alpine ... - Tierra
Archaeoseismology and Palaeoseismology in the Alpine ... - Tierra
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Ris<strong>in</strong>g magnetic susceptibility with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> "f<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g‐up"<br />
sequences validated <strong>the</strong> tsunamigenic gra<strong>in</strong> size<br />
distribution.<br />
Beach section between Barbate <strong>and</strong> Zahara de los Atunes<br />
The 5 km long rock cliff has been mapped, leveled,<br />
sampled (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g sediment lacquer films; Fig. 3). We<br />
have surpris<strong>in</strong>gly found only one layer on top of <strong>the</strong><br />
basement at <strong>the</strong> cliff, <strong>in</strong> vary<strong>in</strong>g altitudes between 1.0 <strong>and</strong><br />
4.5 m above mean sea level. The basement is Cretaceous<br />
to Eocene flysch deposits or OIS 5 terraces (Tyrrhenian) of<br />
approximately 125 ky. The dark s<strong>and</strong>y layer of about 1.0<br />
meter thickness constitutes a "f<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g‐up" sequence with a<br />
coarse‐gra<strong>in</strong>ed base with conglomerates, shell debris <strong>and</strong><br />
charcoal. These deposits are channeled <strong>and</strong> clasts are<br />
imbricated, palaeo‐flow direction is towards <strong>the</strong> Atlantic.<br />
As <strong>the</strong> beach s<strong>and</strong>s are white to yellowish <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> layer is<br />
dark, organic‐ <strong>and</strong> clay m<strong>in</strong>eral‐rich, but s<strong>and</strong>y, we<br />
<strong>in</strong>terpret this layer as a back flow. Palaeo‐current<br />
directions endorse <strong>the</strong>se observations <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> evidence<br />
that only one layer is preserved. Presumably, former<br />
tsunamites were eroded due to multiple wave action <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> cliff was “cleaned” to <strong>the</strong> basement by <strong>the</strong> waves.<br />
Fig. 3: Sediment lacquer film of <strong>the</strong> "back‐wash" sediment,<br />
outcropped at <strong>the</strong> beach of Barbate; Bottom l<strong>in</strong>e is <strong>the</strong> boundary<br />
of flysch deposits <strong>and</strong> “back‐wash” sediment (erosive base); Top<br />
l<strong>in</strong>e is <strong>the</strong> boundary of “back‐wash” sediment <strong>and</strong> topsoil.<br />
The dark clayey marshl<strong>and</strong>s of Barbate have been<br />
reworked <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> tsunamite was deposited as a mixture<br />
of beach s<strong>and</strong>s, boulders <strong>and</strong> shell <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> clayey marsh<br />
deposits dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> back flow of <strong>the</strong> last major wave. The<br />
Fl<strong>and</strong>rian transgression had a maximum at about 7.000 to<br />
6000 years BP <strong>and</strong> reached altitudes of 3.0 to 4.0 m above<br />
<strong>the</strong> present sea level <strong>and</strong> cannot account for <strong>the</strong>se<br />
deposits. Our <strong>in</strong>terpretation of <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>cipal sediment‐<br />
deposit<strong>in</strong>g mechanisms effective <strong>in</strong> tsunami surges is<br />
based on field observations of deposit geometry <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>ternal sedimentary characteristics, which are clearly not<br />
related to a beach.<br />
1 st INQUA‐IGCP‐567 International Workshop on Earthquake Archaeology <strong>and</strong> <strong>Palaeoseismology</strong><br />
74<br />
Shallow drill<strong>in</strong>g at location B 7 give us fur<strong>the</strong>r clues for a<br />
tsunami event. Three “f<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g‐up” sequences on top of<br />
each o<strong>the</strong>r show us that accord<strong>in</strong>gly more than one wave<br />
of <strong>the</strong> so‐called tsunami wave tra<strong>in</strong> is documented by<br />
<strong>the</strong>se deposits. Also “rip‐up” clasts ‐ mostly angular clasts<br />
which are imbricated by clayey sediments ‐ are detected<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sedimentary drill<strong>in</strong>g core at this location.<br />
Bolonia Bay<br />
Here, we <strong>in</strong>vestigated <strong>the</strong> Roman ru<strong>in</strong>s of Baelo Claudia.<br />
As mentioned above, several <strong>in</strong>dicators of tsunami<br />
deposits have been published. We are currently<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g deposits <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ru<strong>in</strong>s, which may also conta<strong>in</strong><br />
tsunami‐reworked “post‐Roman” colluvium (Silva et al.,<br />
2009). Also, <strong>the</strong> deposits described by Becker‐Heidmann<br />
et al. (2007) are under exam<strong>in</strong>ation. The “block fields” of<br />
Garcia et al. (2006) are related to small creek mouths <strong>in</strong>to<br />
<strong>the</strong> Atlantic, we regard <strong>the</strong>se as storm deposits rework<strong>in</strong>g<br />
fluvial pebbles. They are only found near <strong>the</strong> creeks <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />
heights of 2.0 meters to 3.0 meters above <strong>the</strong> mean sea<br />
level along <strong>the</strong> beach.<br />
Valdevaqueros Bay (Mellaria)<br />
In this bay <strong>the</strong> rests of <strong>the</strong> Roman village of Mellaria are<br />
partly exposed, <strong>the</strong>y are not excavated <strong>and</strong> covered by<br />
2.0 meters of s<strong>and</strong>y, clayey sediments. The laguna of<br />
Valdevaqueros yields dark organic‐rich marshy sediments,<br />
which may possibly be reworked dur<strong>in</strong>g wave action. We<br />
have drilled a profile perpendicular to <strong>the</strong> coast up to 4.0<br />
m depth. Surpris<strong>in</strong>gly, laboratory analysis gave no clues to<br />
tsunami event <strong>in</strong> this area. The sedimentary cores of<br />
Valdevaqueros do not conta<strong>in</strong> any tsunamigenic features.<br />
Ei<strong>the</strong>r tsunami deposits are reworked <strong>and</strong>/or eroded by<br />
<strong>the</strong> river nearby or <strong>the</strong> tsunami waves did not hit<br />
Valdevaqueros frontally due to wave directions of <strong>the</strong><br />
1755 Lisbon event <strong>and</strong> bay protection. As well <strong>the</strong> locality<br />
of Mellaria is not <strong>the</strong> one <strong>in</strong>dicated by Gracia et al. (2006),<br />
who put <strong>the</strong> village <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Los Lances bay. Mellaria was a<br />
Roman fishery village directly at <strong>the</strong> coast.<br />
Los Lances area (Tarifa)<br />
The marshl<strong>and</strong>s of <strong>the</strong> Río Jara north of Tarifa are called<br />
Los Lances (Fig. 4). Here, wash‐over fans of <strong>the</strong> Lisbon<br />
tsunami (without age constra<strong>in</strong>ts) (Gracia et al., 2006).<br />
Fig. 4: Map of Los Lances Bay near Tarifa; washover fans caused<br />
by <strong>the</strong> 1755 tsunami are also illustrated.<br />
We have drilled a profile perpendicular <strong>and</strong> parallel to <strong>the</strong><br />
coast up to 4.0 m depth. We have found similar<br />
<strong>in</strong>tercalations of tsunamites downhole, which are