03.04.2013 Views

Archaeoseismology and Palaeoseismology in the Alpine ... - Tierra

Archaeoseismology and Palaeoseismology in the Alpine ... - Tierra

Archaeoseismology and Palaeoseismology in the Alpine ... - Tierra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ris<strong>in</strong>g magnetic susceptibility with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> "f<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g‐up"<br />

sequences validated <strong>the</strong> tsunamigenic gra<strong>in</strong> size<br />

distribution.<br />

Beach section between Barbate <strong>and</strong> Zahara de los Atunes<br />

The 5 km long rock cliff has been mapped, leveled,<br />

sampled (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g sediment lacquer films; Fig. 3). We<br />

have surpris<strong>in</strong>gly found only one layer on top of <strong>the</strong><br />

basement at <strong>the</strong> cliff, <strong>in</strong> vary<strong>in</strong>g altitudes between 1.0 <strong>and</strong><br />

4.5 m above mean sea level. The basement is Cretaceous<br />

to Eocene flysch deposits or OIS 5 terraces (Tyrrhenian) of<br />

approximately 125 ky. The dark s<strong>and</strong>y layer of about 1.0<br />

meter thickness constitutes a "f<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g‐up" sequence with a<br />

coarse‐gra<strong>in</strong>ed base with conglomerates, shell debris <strong>and</strong><br />

charcoal. These deposits are channeled <strong>and</strong> clasts are<br />

imbricated, palaeo‐flow direction is towards <strong>the</strong> Atlantic.<br />

As <strong>the</strong> beach s<strong>and</strong>s are white to yellowish <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> layer is<br />

dark, organic‐ <strong>and</strong> clay m<strong>in</strong>eral‐rich, but s<strong>and</strong>y, we<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpret this layer as a back flow. Palaeo‐current<br />

directions endorse <strong>the</strong>se observations <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> evidence<br />

that only one layer is preserved. Presumably, former<br />

tsunamites were eroded due to multiple wave action <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> cliff was “cleaned” to <strong>the</strong> basement by <strong>the</strong> waves.<br />

Fig. 3: Sediment lacquer film of <strong>the</strong> "back‐wash" sediment,<br />

outcropped at <strong>the</strong> beach of Barbate; Bottom l<strong>in</strong>e is <strong>the</strong> boundary<br />

of flysch deposits <strong>and</strong> “back‐wash” sediment (erosive base); Top<br />

l<strong>in</strong>e is <strong>the</strong> boundary of “back‐wash” sediment <strong>and</strong> topsoil.<br />

The dark clayey marshl<strong>and</strong>s of Barbate have been<br />

reworked <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> tsunamite was deposited as a mixture<br />

of beach s<strong>and</strong>s, boulders <strong>and</strong> shell <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> clayey marsh<br />

deposits dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> back flow of <strong>the</strong> last major wave. The<br />

Fl<strong>and</strong>rian transgression had a maximum at about 7.000 to<br />

6000 years BP <strong>and</strong> reached altitudes of 3.0 to 4.0 m above<br />

<strong>the</strong> present sea level <strong>and</strong> cannot account for <strong>the</strong>se<br />

deposits. Our <strong>in</strong>terpretation of <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>cipal sediment‐<br />

deposit<strong>in</strong>g mechanisms effective <strong>in</strong> tsunami surges is<br />

based on field observations of deposit geometry <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>ternal sedimentary characteristics, which are clearly not<br />

related to a beach.<br />

1 st INQUA‐IGCP‐567 International Workshop on Earthquake Archaeology <strong>and</strong> <strong>Palaeoseismology</strong><br />

74<br />

Shallow drill<strong>in</strong>g at location B 7 give us fur<strong>the</strong>r clues for a<br />

tsunami event. Three “f<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g‐up” sequences on top of<br />

each o<strong>the</strong>r show us that accord<strong>in</strong>gly more than one wave<br />

of <strong>the</strong> so‐called tsunami wave tra<strong>in</strong> is documented by<br />

<strong>the</strong>se deposits. Also “rip‐up” clasts ‐ mostly angular clasts<br />

which are imbricated by clayey sediments ‐ are detected<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sedimentary drill<strong>in</strong>g core at this location.<br />

Bolonia Bay<br />

Here, we <strong>in</strong>vestigated <strong>the</strong> Roman ru<strong>in</strong>s of Baelo Claudia.<br />

As mentioned above, several <strong>in</strong>dicators of tsunami<br />

deposits have been published. We are currently<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g deposits <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ru<strong>in</strong>s, which may also conta<strong>in</strong><br />

tsunami‐reworked “post‐Roman” colluvium (Silva et al.,<br />

2009). Also, <strong>the</strong> deposits described by Becker‐Heidmann<br />

et al. (2007) are under exam<strong>in</strong>ation. The “block fields” of<br />

Garcia et al. (2006) are related to small creek mouths <strong>in</strong>to<br />

<strong>the</strong> Atlantic, we regard <strong>the</strong>se as storm deposits rework<strong>in</strong>g<br />

fluvial pebbles. They are only found near <strong>the</strong> creeks <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

heights of 2.0 meters to 3.0 meters above <strong>the</strong> mean sea<br />

level along <strong>the</strong> beach.<br />

Valdevaqueros Bay (Mellaria)<br />

In this bay <strong>the</strong> rests of <strong>the</strong> Roman village of Mellaria are<br />

partly exposed, <strong>the</strong>y are not excavated <strong>and</strong> covered by<br />

2.0 meters of s<strong>and</strong>y, clayey sediments. The laguna of<br />

Valdevaqueros yields dark organic‐rich marshy sediments,<br />

which may possibly be reworked dur<strong>in</strong>g wave action. We<br />

have drilled a profile perpendicular to <strong>the</strong> coast up to 4.0<br />

m depth. Surpris<strong>in</strong>gly, laboratory analysis gave no clues to<br />

tsunami event <strong>in</strong> this area. The sedimentary cores of<br />

Valdevaqueros do not conta<strong>in</strong> any tsunamigenic features.<br />

Ei<strong>the</strong>r tsunami deposits are reworked <strong>and</strong>/or eroded by<br />

<strong>the</strong> river nearby or <strong>the</strong> tsunami waves did not hit<br />

Valdevaqueros frontally due to wave directions of <strong>the</strong><br />

1755 Lisbon event <strong>and</strong> bay protection. As well <strong>the</strong> locality<br />

of Mellaria is not <strong>the</strong> one <strong>in</strong>dicated by Gracia et al. (2006),<br />

who put <strong>the</strong> village <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Los Lances bay. Mellaria was a<br />

Roman fishery village directly at <strong>the</strong> coast.<br />

Los Lances area (Tarifa)<br />

The marshl<strong>and</strong>s of <strong>the</strong> Río Jara north of Tarifa are called<br />

Los Lances (Fig. 4). Here, wash‐over fans of <strong>the</strong> Lisbon<br />

tsunami (without age constra<strong>in</strong>ts) (Gracia et al., 2006).<br />

Fig. 4: Map of Los Lances Bay near Tarifa; washover fans caused<br />

by <strong>the</strong> 1755 tsunami are also illustrated.<br />

We have drilled a profile perpendicular <strong>and</strong> parallel to <strong>the</strong><br />

coast up to 4.0 m depth. We have found similar<br />

<strong>in</strong>tercalations of tsunamites downhole, which are

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!