Governing property, making the modern state - PSI424
Governing property, making the modern state - PSI424
Governing property, making the modern state - PSI424
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
in descending rank order by size in Tibna. The holdings, even of ‘Abd al-Qadir<br />
Sharaida, belong to a pattern of long-established olive cultivation, unlike <strong>the</strong> olive<br />
plantations developed by Ibrahim Sa‘d al-Din. This pattern includes women owners,<br />
of whom <strong>the</strong>re are none in <strong>the</strong> Kafarat. Thus ‘Abd al-Qadir’s son Muhammad<br />
Sa‘id owns fourteen olive trees toge<strong>the</strong>r with Muhra bint Khamis, most probably<br />
his mo<strong>the</strong>r or else his wife. 53 Likewise Mahmud Yusuf Sharaida owns ten olive<br />
trees jointly with Amira bint Mustafa Sharaida. Mustafa Sharaida has his house<br />
and grain land in ano<strong>the</strong>r village but owns 65 olive trees in Tibna. Amira may<br />
thus have acquired her olive trees as mahr on her marriage to Mahmud Yusuf<br />
Sharaida. 54 Lastly a son of Mustafa Sharaida, Hamdan, holds thirteen trees with<br />
Amira bint Faris al-Dhib.<br />
In Tibna women are present in 18 per cent of all holdings but hold only 7<br />
per cent of all olive trees. They do not always hold with male relatives; cases<br />
are found of three sisters holding toge<strong>the</strong>r and of a mo<strong>the</strong>r and daughter. Most<br />
often, women hold as individuals. Women also own some of <strong>the</strong> private plots<br />
and, exceptional for <strong>the</strong> ‘Ajlun tapu registers, women are listed as owners of<br />
four houses in <strong>the</strong> village. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, olive production was bound into <strong>the</strong><br />
domestic and marital economy in a manner very distinct from <strong>the</strong> commercial<br />
development of olive production in <strong>the</strong> Kafarat. This is true for <strong>the</strong> Sharaida as<br />
for o<strong>the</strong>r families of Tibna.<br />
Ibrahim Sa‘d al-Din and Muflih al-Jabr of <strong>the</strong> Kafarat<br />
The Kafarat region forms <strong>the</strong> only evident exception in <strong>the</strong> registers to <strong>the</strong><br />
general dominance of field crops and grain in <strong>the</strong> production mix. See Map 5.4.<br />
Oral tradition in <strong>the</strong> area of Saham and Samar suggests that in <strong>the</strong> 1880s such<br />
development was relatively new and bound up with Kurdish financiers from<br />
Damascus. 55 Taken alone, <strong>the</strong> registers indicate <strong>the</strong> following: in Saham both<br />
olive trees and land were first registered in April 1882 in <strong>the</strong> names of villagers,<br />
but only two months later, one-half of all <strong>the</strong> shares were sold to Rifatlu Tahir,<br />
presumably Rifatlu Tahir Badr Khan, a Damascene of Kurdish origin appointed<br />
governor of ‘Ajlun in that year. 56 In Samar <strong>the</strong> transfer of <strong>property</strong> was less brutal,<br />
but <strong>the</strong>re, too, some five years after first registration, a significant proportion of<br />
both trees and land were sold to Muhammad Efendi Sa‘dun. In <strong>the</strong> relatively poor<br />
lands of Saham and Samar, development of large-scale olive cultivation came to<br />
entail indebtedness for villagers and <strong>the</strong> rapid alienation of <strong>property</strong> rights.<br />
Elsewhere in <strong>the</strong> Kafarat, commercial development of olive cultivation appears<br />
more <strong>the</strong> work of insiders, notably <strong>the</strong> various family lines known today as <strong>the</strong><br />
‘Ubaidat.<br />
The only village of <strong>the</strong> Kafarat where land was registered in <strong>the</strong> years before <strong>the</strong><br />
appointment of Da’ud ‘Abbada was Hubras; 1,679 dönüms of land were registered<br />
in December 1876 in a somewhat anomalous form: while <strong>the</strong> scribe ‘Umar noted<br />
that normal fees were collected, <strong>the</strong>se equalled 10 per cent of <strong>the</strong> value declared,<br />
<strong>the</strong> level for bedel-i misl not hakk-ı karar; fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, as <strong>the</strong> land use is not<br />
defined, we cannot tell whe<strong>the</strong>r Hubras had olive plantations. What is clear,<br />
93<br />
Regional leadership