04.04.2013 Views

Governing property, making the modern state - PSI424

Governing property, making the modern state - PSI424

Governing property, making the modern state - PSI424

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TABLE 10.2 Khanzira, share per person and per holding in 1884<br />

Holdings ¼-shares Co-sharers ¼-share per<br />

person<br />

Single individual<br />

¼-share 4 4 4 1<br />

½-share 16 32 16 2<br />

¾-share 3 9 3 3<br />

1–share 4 16 4 4<br />

TOTAL<br />

Partnerships<br />

27 61 27 2.15<br />

Bro<strong>the</strong>rs, BS, FBS 22 50 51 0.98<br />

Bro<strong>the</strong>rs + ZS 1 4 4 1<br />

Fa<strong>the</strong>r-son 2 6 6 1<br />

Equal unrelated 9 25 21 1.19<br />

Unequal unrelated 7 29 30 0.97<br />

TOTAL 41 114 112 1.02<br />

GRAND TOTAL 68 175 139 1.26<br />

at <strong>the</strong> 1895 survey. A fur<strong>the</strong>r three or four individuals who each made up a final<br />

share in a musha‘ holding in 1884 may also not have been permanently resident<br />

in <strong>the</strong> village at <strong>the</strong> time. O<strong>the</strong>rs who were listed as co-sharers in musha‘ holdings<br />

may have been living with relatives. 24 One or two people, both in 1884 and 1895,<br />

were registered as belonging to <strong>the</strong> neighbouring village of Juffain.<br />

Allotment of plough land The principle of allotting shares in <strong>the</strong> common plough<br />

land in Khanzira was <strong>the</strong> same as in Kufr ‘Awan, by counting <strong>the</strong> number of<br />

male heads and by <strong>making</strong> up viable shareholding units through partnerships.<br />

But <strong>the</strong>re may have been more land per head available in Khanzira despite its<br />

greater population, for <strong>the</strong>re is only one holding in which two bro<strong>the</strong>rs shared<br />

a quarter-share and <strong>the</strong> majority of holdings by a single person were of half<br />

a share, or two zalama not one. In o<strong>the</strong>r words <strong>the</strong> calculation of household<br />

labour may have been less exact, and a married man could take on half a share<br />

or more if he felt his labour prospects sufficient. The total number of shares was<br />

43¾, equivalent to 175 zalama, giving an average of 15q per holding or 7½q per<br />

person registered. A breakdown of <strong>the</strong> composition of musha‘ holdings is given<br />

in Table 10.2. Three-fifths of <strong>the</strong> holdings were in partnerships in which each<br />

partner had a quarter-share, corresponding to one zalama.<br />

In Table 10.2 partnerships have been classified into three types. The majority<br />

were between close agnates, usually bro<strong>the</strong>rs or a bro<strong>the</strong>r’s son but in two cases<br />

between a fa<strong>the</strong>r and two sons, and in two o<strong>the</strong>r cases between cousins whose<br />

exact relationship is unknown. A partnership between a fa<strong>the</strong>r and sons, each<br />

179<br />

Two hill villages

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!