06.04.2013 Views

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

94 13. FIRST ORDER SYSTEMS<br />

n (po<strong>in</strong>twise) l<strong>in</strong>early <strong>in</strong>dependent solutions of these equations the deficiency<br />

<strong>in</strong>dices can be no larger than n; <strong>in</strong> particular they are both<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ite. We now make the follow<strong>in</strong>g basic assumption.<br />

Assumption 13.7. If K is a sufficiently large, compact sub<strong>in</strong>terval<br />

of I there is no non-trivial solution of Ju ′ +Qu = 0 with <br />

K u∗ W u = 0.<br />

Note that if there is a solution with u ∗ W u = 0, then W u = 0 so u<br />

actually also solves Ju ′ + Qu = λW u for any complex λ. The assumption<br />

automatically holds if (13.1) is equivalent to a Sturm-Liouville<br />

equation, or more generally an equation of the types discussed <strong>in</strong> Example<br />

13.3 and Exercise 13.3. One reason for mak<strong>in</strong>g the assumption is<br />

that it ensures that the deficiency <strong>in</strong>dices of T0 are precisely equal to the<br />

dimensions of the spaces of those solutions of Ju ′ + Qu = ±iW u which<br />

have f<strong>in</strong>ite norm, but the assumption will be even more important <strong>in</strong><br />

the next chapter.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Corollary 9.15 there will be selfadjo<strong>in</strong>t realizations of<br />

(13.1) precisely if the deficiency <strong>in</strong>dices are equal. We will <strong>in</strong> the rest<br />

of this chapter assume that a selfadjo<strong>in</strong>t extension of T0 exists. Some<br />

simple criterions that ensure this are given <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g proposition,<br />

but if these do not apply it can, <strong>in</strong> a concrete case, be very difficult to<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>e whether there are selfadjo<strong>in</strong>t realizations or not.<br />

Proposition 13.8. The m<strong>in</strong>imal relation T0 has equal deficiency<br />

<strong>in</strong>dices if either of the follow<strong>in</strong>g conditions is satisfied:<br />

(1) J, Q and W are real-valued.<br />

(2) The <strong>in</strong>terval I is compact.<br />

Proof. If u ∈ L 2 W satisfies Ju′ + Qu = λW u and the coefficients<br />

are real-valued, then conjugation shows that u is still <strong>in</strong> L 2 W and Ju′ +<br />

Qu = λW u. There is therefore a one-to-one correspondence between<br />

Dλ and D λ which obviously preserves l<strong>in</strong>ear <strong>in</strong>dependence. It follows<br />

that n+ = n−.<br />

If I is compact, then solutions of Ju ′ + Qu = λW u are absolutely<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uous <strong>in</strong> I, and W is <strong>in</strong>tegrable <strong>in</strong> I, so that all solutions are <strong>in</strong><br />

L 2 W . Thus n+ = n− = n. <br />

Example 13.9. Note that J ∗ = −J, so J can be real-valued only if<br />

n is even (show this!). Suppose u solves the equation m<br />

k=0 (pku (k) ) (k) =<br />

iwu where the coefficients p0, . . . pm are realvalued and w > 0. Then u<br />

satisfies m<br />

k=0 (pku (k) ) (k) = −iwu. It follows that if (13.1) is equivalent<br />

to an equation of this form, then its deficiency <strong>in</strong>dices are always equal<br />

so that selfadjo<strong>in</strong>t realizations exist. This is <strong>in</strong> particular the case for<br />

the Sturm-Liouville equation (10.1).<br />

We will now take a closer look at how selfadjo<strong>in</strong>t realizations are<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ed as restrictions of the maximal relation. Suppose (u1, v1)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!