Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space
Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space
Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
10. BOUNDARY CONDITIONS 65<br />
Let us now consider the s<strong>in</strong>gular case. We will then first consider<br />
the case when one endpo<strong>in</strong>t is regular and the other s<strong>in</strong>gular. So,<br />
assume that I = [a, b) with a regular and b possibly s<strong>in</strong>gular.<br />
Lemma 10.7. There are elements of D1 which vanish <strong>in</strong> a neighborhood<br />
of b and have arbitrarily prescribed <strong>in</strong>itial values u(a) and u ′ (a).<br />
Proof. Let c ∈ (a, b) and f ∈ L2 (a, b) vanish <strong>in</strong> (c, b). Now solve<br />
−u ′′ + qu = f with <strong>in</strong>itial data u(c) = u ′ (c) = 0 so that u vanishes <strong>in</strong><br />
(c, b). It follows that u ∈ D1, and we need to show that u(a) and u ′ (a)<br />
can be chosen arbitrarily by selection of f. Note that if −v ′′ + qv = 0<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g by parts twice shows that<br />
c<br />
〈f, v〉 = (−u ′′ + qu)v = [−u ′ v + uv ′ ] c a = u ′ (a)v(a) − u(a)v ′ (a).<br />
a<br />
If v1 and v2 are solutions of −v ′′ +qv = 0 satisfy<strong>in</strong>g v1(a) = 1, v ′ 1(a) = 0<br />
and v2(a) = 0, v ′ 2(a) = −1 respectively, we obta<strong>in</strong> u(a) = 〈f, v2〉 and<br />
u ′ (a) = 〈f, v1〉. S<strong>in</strong>ce v1, v2 are l<strong>in</strong>early <strong>in</strong>dependent we can choose<br />
f to give arbitrary values to this, for example by choos<strong>in</strong>g f as an<br />
appropriate l<strong>in</strong>ear comb<strong>in</strong>ation of v1 and v2 <strong>in</strong> [a, c]. <br />
The fact that T1 and T0 are closed means that their doma<strong>in</strong>s are<br />
<strong>Hilbert</strong> spaces with norm-square u 2 1 = u 2 +T1u 2 . We shall always<br />
view D1 and D0 as spaces <strong>in</strong> this way. We also note that if u ∈ D1, then<br />
u is cont<strong>in</strong>uously differentiable. If K is a compact <strong>in</strong>terval we def<strong>in</strong>e<br />
C 1 (K) to be the l<strong>in</strong>ear space of cont<strong>in</strong>uously differentiable functions<br />
provided with the norm uK = sup K |u|+sup K |u ′ |. Convergence for a<br />
sequence {uj} ∞ 1 <strong>in</strong> this space therefore means uniform convergence on<br />
K of uj and u ′ j as j → ∞. This space is easily seen to be complete, and<br />
thus a Banach space. As we noted above, if K is a compact sub<strong>in</strong>terval<br />
of I, then the restriction to K of any element of D1 is <strong>in</strong> C 1 (K). We<br />
will need the follow<strong>in</strong>g fact.<br />
Lemma 10.8. For every compact sub<strong>in</strong>terval K ⊂ I there exists a<br />
constant CK such that uK ≤ CKu1 for every u ∈ D1. In particular,<br />
the l<strong>in</strong>ear forms D1 ∋ u ↦→ u(x) and D1 ∋ u ↦→ u ′ (x) are locally<br />
uniformly bounded <strong>in</strong> x.<br />
Proof. The restriction map D1 ∋ u ↦→ u ∈ C 1 (K) is l<strong>in</strong>ear and<br />
we will show that this map is closed. By the closed graph theorem (see<br />
Appendix A) it then follows that this map is bounded, which is the<br />
statement of the lemma.<br />
To show that the map is closed we must show that if uj → u <strong>in</strong><br />
D1 and the restrictions to K of uj converge to ũ <strong>in</strong> C 1 (K), then the<br />
restriction to K of u equals ũ. But this is clear, s<strong>in</strong>ce if uj converges<br />
<strong>in</strong> L 2 (I) to u, then their restrictions to K converge <strong>in</strong> L 2 (K) to the<br />
restriction of u to K. At the same time the restrictions to K converge