06.04.2013 Views

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 5<br />

Resolvents<br />

We now consider a closed, densely def<strong>in</strong>ed operator T <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Hilbert</strong><br />

space H. We def<strong>in</strong>e the solvability and deficiency spaces of T at λ by<br />

Sλ = {u ∈ H | (T − λ)v = u for some v ∈ D(T )}<br />

Dλ = {u ∈ D(T ∗ ) | T ∗ u = λu}.<br />

The follow<strong>in</strong>g basic lemma is valid.<br />

Lemma 5.1. Supposed T is closed and densely def<strong>in</strong>ed. Then<br />

(1) D λ = H ⊖ Sλ.<br />

(2) If T is symmetric and Im λ = 0, then Sλ is closed and H =<br />

Sλ ⊕ D λ<br />

(3) If T is selfadjo<strong>in</strong>t and Im λ = 0, then (T − λ)v = u is uniquely<br />

solvable for any u ∈ H ( i.e., Sλ = H), T has no non-real<br />

eigen-values ( i.e., Dλ = {0}), and v ≤ 1<br />

|Im λ| u.<br />

Proof. Any element of the graph of T is of the form (v, λv + u),<br />

where u ∈ Sλ. To see this, simply put u = T v − λv for any v ∈ D(T ).<br />

Now 〈T v, w〉 − 〈v, λw〉 = 〈u + λv, w〉 − 〈v, λw〉 = 〈u, w〉, so it follows<br />

that (w, λw) ∈ GT ∗, i.e., w ∈ Dλ , if and only if w is orthogonal to Sλ.<br />

This proves (1).<br />

If T is symmetric and (v, λv+u) ∈ GT , then 〈λv+u, v〉 = 〈v, λv+u〉,<br />

i.e., Im λv2 = Im〈v, u〉, which is ≤ vu by Cauchy-Schwarz’ <strong>in</strong>equality.<br />

If Im λ = 0 we obta<strong>in</strong> v ≤ 1 u, so that v is uniquely<br />

|Im λ|<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ed by u; <strong>in</strong> particular T has no non-real eigen-values. Furthermore,<br />

suppose that u1, u2, . . . is a sequence <strong>in</strong> Sλ converg<strong>in</strong>g to u, and<br />

that (vj, λvj + uj) ∈ GT . Then v1, v2, . . . is also a Cauchy sequence,<br />

s<strong>in</strong>ce vj − vk ≤ 1<br />

|Im λ| uj − uk. Thus vj tends to some limit v, and<br />

s<strong>in</strong>ce T is closed we have (v, λv + u) ∈ GT . Hence u ∈ Sλ, so that Sλ<br />

is closed and (2) follows.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, if T is self-adjo<strong>in</strong>t, then T ∗ = T is symmetric so it has no<br />

non-real eigen-values. If Im λ = 0 it follows that Dλ = {0} so that (3)<br />

follows and the proof is complete. <br />

In the rest of this chapter we assume that T is a selfadjo<strong>in</strong>t operator.<br />

We def<strong>in</strong>e the resolvent set of T as<br />

ρ(T ) = {λ ∈ C | T − λ has a bounded, everywhere def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>verse} ,<br />

31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!