Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space
Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space
Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
6. NEVANLINNA FUNCTIONS 37<br />
choose k and n such that ρ(rn) − ρ(rk) < ε. We then obta<strong>in</strong><br />
−ε ≤ lim (ρjj(x) − ρ(x)) ≤ lim (ρjj(x) − ρ(x)) ≤ ε .<br />
j→∞<br />
j→∞<br />
Hence {ρjj} ∞ 1 converges po<strong>in</strong>twise to ρ, except possibly <strong>in</strong> po<strong>in</strong>ts of<br />
discont<strong>in</strong>uity of ρ. But there are at most countably many such discont<strong>in</strong>uities,<br />
ρ be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g. Hence repeat<strong>in</strong>g the trick of extract<strong>in</strong>g<br />
subsequences, and then us<strong>in</strong>g the ‘diagonal’ sequence, we get a subsequence<br />
of the orig<strong>in</strong>al sequence which converges everywhere <strong>in</strong> I. We<br />
now obta<strong>in</strong> (1).<br />
If f is the characteristic function of a compact <strong>in</strong>terval whose endpo<strong>in</strong>ts<br />
are po<strong>in</strong>ts of cont<strong>in</strong>uity for ρ and all ρj it is obvious that (6.3)<br />
holds. It follows that (6.3) holds if f is a stepfunction with all discont<strong>in</strong>uities<br />
at po<strong>in</strong>ts where ρ and all ρj are cont<strong>in</strong>uous. If f is cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />
and ε > 0 we may, by uniform cont<strong>in</strong>uity, choose such a stepfunction<br />
g so that supI|f − g| < ε. If C is a common bound for all ρj we then<br />
obta<strong>in</strong> | <br />
I (f − g) dρ| < 2Cε and similarly with ρ replaced by ρj. It<br />
follows that limj→∞| <br />
I f dρj − <br />
f dρ| ≤ 4Cε and s<strong>in</strong>ce ε is arbitrary<br />
I<br />
positive (2) follows. <br />
Proof of Theorem 6.3. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Lemma 6.2 we have, for<br />
|z| < 1,<br />
G(Rz) = i Im G(0) + 1<br />
2π<br />
π<br />
−π<br />
e iθ + z<br />
e iθ − z dσR(θ) ,<br />
where σR(θ) = θ<br />
−π Re G(Reiϕ ) dϕ. Hence σR is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g, ≥ 0 and<br />
bounded from above by σR(π). Now Re G is a harmonic function so it<br />
has the mean value property, which means that σR(π) = 2π Re G(0).<br />
This is <strong>in</strong>dependent of R, so by Helly’s theorem we may choose a sequence<br />
Rj ↑ 1 such that σR converges to an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g function σ. Use<br />
of the second part of Helly’s theorem completes the proof. <br />
To prove the uniqueness of the function ρ of Theorem 6.1 we need<br />
the follow<strong>in</strong>g simple, but important, lemma.<br />
Lemma 6.5 (Stieltjes’ <strong>in</strong>version formula). Let ρ be complex-valued<br />
of locally bounded variation, and such that ∞ dρ(t)<br />
−∞ t2 is absolutely con-<br />
+1<br />
vergent. Suppose F (λ) is given by (6.1). Then if y < x are po<strong>in</strong>ts of<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>uity of ρ we have<br />
ρ(x) − ρ(y) = lim<br />
ε↓0<br />
1<br />
2πi<br />
x<br />
y<br />
(F (s + iε) − F (s − iε) ds<br />
= lim<br />
ε↓0<br />
1<br />
π<br />
x<br />
y<br />
∞<br />
−∞<br />
ε dρ(t)<br />
(t − s) 2 ds .<br />
+ ε2