Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space
Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space
Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
u(c) = 0 is given by<br />
(13.2) u(x) = F (x, λ)J −1<br />
<br />
13. FIRST ORDER SYSTEMS 93<br />
c<br />
x<br />
F ∗ (y, λ)W (y)v(y) dy .<br />
Proof. We have (F ∗ (x, λ)JF (x, λ)) ′ = −(JF ′ (x, λ)) ∗ F (x, λ) +<br />
F ∗ (x, λ)JF ′ (x, λ) = 0 us<strong>in</strong>g the differential equation. It follows that<br />
F ∗ (x, λ)JF (x, λ) is constant. S<strong>in</strong>ce it equals J for x = c this is its<br />
value for all x ∈ I. It follows that J −1 F ∗ (x, λ) is the <strong>in</strong>verse matrix of<br />
JF (x, λ). Straightforward differentiation now shows that (13.2) solves<br />
the equation. <br />
Corollary 13.5. If v ∈ L2 W with compact support <strong>in</strong> I then (13.1)<br />
has a solution u with compact support <strong>in</strong> I if and only if <br />
I v∗W u0 = 0<br />
for all solutions u0 of the homogeneous equation (13.1) with v = 0.<br />
Proof. If we choose c to the left of the support of v, then by<br />
Lemma 13.4 the function u(x) = F (x)J −1 x<br />
c F ∗W v is the only solution<br />
of (13.1) which vanishes to the left of c. S<strong>in</strong>ce F (x)J −1 is <strong>in</strong>vertible<br />
(13.1) has a solution of compact support if and only if <br />
I F ∗W v = 0.<br />
But the columns of F are l<strong>in</strong>early <strong>in</strong>dependent so they are a basis for<br />
the solutions of the homogeneous equation. The corollary follows. <br />
Lemma 13.6. Suppose (u, v) ∈ T ∗ 0 . Then there is a representative<br />
of the equivalence class u, also denoted by u, which is absolutely cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />
and satisfies Ju ′ + Qu = W v. Conversely, if this holds, then<br />
(u, v) ∈ T ∗ 0 .<br />
Proof. Let u1 be a solution of Ju ′ 1 + Qu1 = W v and assume<br />
(u0, v0) ∈ T0 has compact support. Integrat<strong>in</strong>g by parts we get<br />
<br />
v ∗ <br />
W u0 = (Ju ′ 1 + Qu1) ∗ <br />
u0 = u ∗ 1(Ju ′ <br />
0 + Qu0) = u ∗ 1W v0.<br />
I<br />
I<br />
This proves the converse part of the lemma. We also have 0 = 〈u0, v〉−<br />
〈v0, u〉 = 〈v0, u1 − u〉. Here v0 is an arbitrary compactly supported<br />
element of L2 W for which there exists a compactly supported element<br />
u0 ∈ L2 W satisfy<strong>in</strong>g Ju′ 0 + Qu0 = W v0. By Corollary13.5 it follows that<br />
u1 − u solves the homogeneous equation, i.e., u solves (13.1). <br />
It now follows that T0 is symmetric and that its adjo<strong>in</strong>t is given<br />
by the maximal relation T1 consist<strong>in</strong>g of all pairs (u, v) <strong>in</strong> L2 W × L2W such that u is (the equivalence class of) a locally absolutely cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />
function for which Ju ′ + Qu = W v. We can now apply the theory of<br />
Chapter 9.2. The deficiency <strong>in</strong>dices of T0 are accord<strong>in</strong>gly the number<br />
of solutions of Ju ′ + Qu = iW u and Ju ′ + Qu = −iW u respectively<br />
which are l<strong>in</strong>early <strong>in</strong>dependent <strong>in</strong> L2 W . S<strong>in</strong>ce there are altogether only<br />
I<br />
I