06.04.2013 Views

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

72 11. STURM-LIOUVILLE EQUATIONS<br />

obta<strong>in</strong> a cos<strong>in</strong>e series f(x) = a0<br />

2 + ∞ and ak = 〈f(x), cos kx〉.<br />

k=1 ak cos(kx), where a0 = 〈f, 1〉<br />

We have thus retrieved some of the classical versions of Fourier<br />

series, but is clear that many other variants are obta<strong>in</strong>ed by simply<br />

vary<strong>in</strong>g the boundary conditions, and that many more examples are<br />

obta<strong>in</strong>ed by choos<strong>in</strong>g a non-zero q <strong>in</strong> (10.3).<br />

We now have a satisfactory eigenfunction expansion theory for regular<br />

boundary value problems, so we turn next to s<strong>in</strong>gular problems.<br />

We then need to take a much closer look at Green’s function. We shall<br />

here primarily look at the case of separated boundary conditions for<br />

I = [a, b) where a is a regular endpo<strong>in</strong>t and b possibly s<strong>in</strong>gular, and<br />

refer the reader to the theory of Chapter 15 for the general case. With<br />

this assumption Green’s function has a particularly simple structure.<br />

Assume that ϕ, θ are solutions of −u ′′ + qu = λu with <strong>in</strong>itial data<br />

ϕ(a, λ) = − s<strong>in</strong> α, ϕ ′ (a, λ) = cos α and θ(a, λ) = cos α, θ ′ (a, λ) = s<strong>in</strong> α.<br />

Theorem 11.6. Suppose I = [a, b) with a regular, and that T is<br />

given by the separated condition (10.7) at a, and another separated condition<br />

at b if needed, i.e., if b is regular or <strong>in</strong> the limit circle condition.<br />

If Im λ = 0, then g(x, y, λ) = ϕ(m<strong>in</strong>(x, y), λ)ψ(max(x, y), λ) where ψ is<br />

called the Weyl solution and is given by ψ(x, λ) = θ(x, λ)+m(λ)ϕ(x, λ).<br />

Here m(λ) is called the Weyl-Titchmarsh m-coefficient and is a Nevanl<strong>in</strong>na<br />

function <strong>in</strong> the sense of Chapter 6. The kernel g1 is g1(x, y, λ) =<br />

ϕ ′ (x, λ)ψ(y, λ) if x < y and g1(x, y, λ) = ϕ(y, λ)ψ ′ (x, λ) if x > y.<br />

Proof. It is easily verified that [θ, ϕ] = 1. Now ϕ satisfies the<br />

boundary condition at a and can therefore only satisfy the boundary<br />

condition at b if λ is an eigenvalue and thus real. On the other hand,<br />

there will be a solution <strong>in</strong> L2 (a, b) satisfy<strong>in</strong>g the boundary condition<br />

at b, s<strong>in</strong>ce if deficiency <strong>in</strong>dices are 1 there is no condition at b, and if<br />

deficiency <strong>in</strong>dices are 2, then the condition at b is a l<strong>in</strong>ear, homogeneous<br />

condition on a two-dimensional space, which leaves a space of dimension<br />

1. Thus we may f<strong>in</strong>d a unique m(λ) so that ψ = θ + mϕ satisfies the<br />

boundary condition at b. It follows that [ψ, ϕ] = [θ, ϕ] + m[ϕ, ϕ] = 1.<br />

Now sett<strong>in</strong>g v(x) = 〈u, g(x, ·, λ)〉 and assum<strong>in</strong>g that u ∈ L2 (a, b)<br />

has compact support we obta<strong>in</strong><br />

x<br />

b<br />

v(x) = ψ(x, λ) uϕ(·, λ) + ϕ(x, λ) uψ(·, λ),<br />

a<br />

so that v(a) = − s<strong>in</strong> α b<br />

uψ(·, λ). Differentiat<strong>in</strong>g we obta<strong>in</strong><br />

a<br />

(11.1) v ′ (x) = ψ ′ x<br />

(x, λ) uϕ(·, λ) + ϕ ′ b<br />

(x, λ) uψ(·, λ),<br />

a<br />

x<br />

x

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!