06.04.2013 Views

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

15. SINGULAR PROBLEMS 111<br />

Proof. If u has compact support Lemma 15.7 shows that (15.4)<br />

holds for a dense set of values a, b s<strong>in</strong>ce functions of bounded variation<br />

are a.e. differentiable. S<strong>in</strong>ce both Et and P are left-cont<strong>in</strong>uous we<br />

obta<strong>in</strong>, by lett<strong>in</strong>g b ↑ t, a → −∞ through such values,<br />

t<br />

〈Etu, v〉 = ˆv ∗ (t) dP (t) û(t)<br />

−∞<br />

when u, v have compact supports; first for u = v and then <strong>in</strong> general<br />

by polarization. If PT is the projection of L 2 W onto HT we obta<strong>in</strong> as<br />

t → ∞ also that 〈PT u, v〉W = 〈û, ˆv〉P when u and v have compact<br />

supports.<br />

For arbitrary u ∈ L 2 W<br />

we set, for a compact sub<strong>in</strong>terval K of I,<br />

<br />

uK(x) =<br />

u(x)<br />

0<br />

for x ∈ K<br />

otherwise<br />

and obta<strong>in</strong> a transform ûK. If L is another compact sub<strong>in</strong>terval of I it<br />

follows that ûK − ûLP = PT (uK − uL)W ≤ uK − uLW , and s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

uK → u <strong>in</strong> L2 W as K → I, Cauchy’s convergence pr<strong>in</strong>ciple shows that<br />

ûK converges to an element û ∈ L2 P as K → I. The lemma now follows<br />

<strong>in</strong> full generality by cont<strong>in</strong>uity. <br />

Note that we have proved that F is an isometry on HT , and a<br />

partial isometry on L 2 W .<br />

Lemma 15.9. The <strong>in</strong>tegral <br />

compact <strong>in</strong>terval and û ∈ L 2 P<br />

K F (x, t) dP (t) û(t) is <strong>in</strong> HT if K is a<br />

, and as K → R the <strong>in</strong>tegral converges <strong>in</strong><br />

HT . The limit F −1 (û) is called the <strong>in</strong>verse transform of û. If u ∈ L2 W<br />

then F −1 (F(u)) = PT u. F −1 (û) = 0 if and only if û is orthogonal <strong>in</strong><br />

L2 P to all generalized Fourier transforms.<br />

Proof. If û ∈ L2 P has compact support, then u(x) = 〈û, F ∗ (x, ·)〉P<br />

is cont<strong>in</strong>uous, so uK ∈ L2 W for compact sub<strong>in</strong>tervals K of I, and has a<br />

transform ûK. We have<br />

uK 2 <br />

W = u ∗ ∞<br />

(x)W (x) F (x, t)dP (t)û(t) dx .<br />

K<br />

−∞<br />

Considered as a double <strong>in</strong>tegral this is absolutely convergent, so chang<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the order of <strong>in</strong>tegration we obta<strong>in</strong><br />

uK 2 W =<br />

∞<br />

−∞<br />

<br />

K<br />

F ∗ ∗ (x, t)W (x)u(x) dx dP (t) û(t)<br />

= 〈û, ûK〉P ≤ ûP ûKP ≤ ûP uKW ,<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to Lemma 15.8. Hence uKW ≤ ûP , so u ∈ L 2 W<br />

uW ≤ ûP . If now û ∈ L 2 P<br />

, and<br />

is arbitrary, this <strong>in</strong>equality shows (like

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!