Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space
Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space
Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
130 C. LINEAR FIRST ORDER SYSTEMS<br />
If we <strong>in</strong>tegrate the differential equation <strong>in</strong> (C.1) from c to x, us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the <strong>in</strong>itial data, we get the <strong>in</strong>tegral equation<br />
(C.2) u(x) = H(x) +<br />
x<br />
c<br />
Au,<br />
where H(x) = C+ x<br />
B. Conversely, if u is cont<strong>in</strong>uous and solves (C.2),<br />
c<br />
then u has <strong>in</strong>itial data H(c) = C and is locally absolutely cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />
(be<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>tegral function). Differentiation gives u ′ = Au + B, so that<br />
the <strong>in</strong>itial value problem is equivalent to the <strong>in</strong>tegral equation (C.2).<br />
In the case of Theorem 13.1, we put A = J −1 (Q − λW ) and B = 0<br />
to get an equation of the form (C.1). We therefore need to show the<br />
follow<strong>in</strong>g theorems.<br />
Theorem C.1. Suppose A has locally <strong>in</strong>tegrable, and H locally absolutely<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>uous, elements. Then the <strong>in</strong>tegral equation (C.2) has a<br />
unique, locally absolutely cont<strong>in</strong>uous solution.<br />
Theorem C.2. Suppose that A depends analytically on a parameter<br />
λ, <strong>in</strong> the sense that there is a matrix A ′ (x, λ) which is locally <strong>in</strong>tegrable<br />
with respect to x, and such that <br />
1 | J h (A(x, λ+h)−A(x, λ))−A′ (x, λ)| →<br />
0 as h → 0, for all compact sub<strong>in</strong>tervals J of I, and all λ <strong>in</strong> some open<br />
set Ω ⊂ C. Then the solution u(x, λ) of (C.2) is analytic for λ ∈ Ω,<br />
locally uniformly <strong>in</strong> x.<br />
Proof of Theorem C.1. We will f<strong>in</strong>d a series expansion for the<br />
solution. To do this, we set u0 = H, and if uk is already def<strong>in</strong>ed, we set<br />
uk+1(x) = x<br />
c Auk. It is then clear that uk is def<strong>in</strong>ed for k = 0, 1, . . .<br />
<strong>in</strong>ductively, and all uk are (absolutely) cont<strong>in</strong>uous. I claim that<br />
sup|uk|<br />
≤ sup|H|<br />
[c,x] [c,x]<br />
1<br />
k!<br />
x c<br />
k |A|<br />
for k = 0, 1, . . . ,<br />
for x > c, and a similar <strong>in</strong>equality with c and x <strong>in</strong>terchanged for x < c.<br />
Here |·| denotes a norm on n-vectors, and also the correspond<strong>in</strong>g subord<strong>in</strong>ate<br />
matrix-norm (so that |Au| ≤ |A||u|). Indeed, the <strong>in</strong>equality<br />
is trivial for k = 0, and suppos<strong>in</strong>g it valid for k, we obta<strong>in</strong><br />
|uk+1(x)| ≤<br />
x<br />
c<br />
|A||uk| ≤ 1<br />
k! sup<br />
<br />
|H|<br />
[c,x]<br />
c<br />
x<br />
t k |A(t)| |A| dt<br />
=<br />
1<br />
c<br />
(k + 1)! sup<br />
[c,x]<br />
x |H|<br />
c<br />
k+1 |A| ,<br />
for c < x, and a similar <strong>in</strong>equality for x < c. It follows that the series<br />
u = ∞<br />
k=0 uk is absolutely and uniformly convergent on any compact