06.04.2013 Views

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

130 C. LINEAR FIRST ORDER SYSTEMS<br />

If we <strong>in</strong>tegrate the differential equation <strong>in</strong> (C.1) from c to x, us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the <strong>in</strong>itial data, we get the <strong>in</strong>tegral equation<br />

(C.2) u(x) = H(x) +<br />

x<br />

c<br />

Au,<br />

where H(x) = C+ x<br />

B. Conversely, if u is cont<strong>in</strong>uous and solves (C.2),<br />

c<br />

then u has <strong>in</strong>itial data H(c) = C and is locally absolutely cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />

(be<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>tegral function). Differentiation gives u ′ = Au + B, so that<br />

the <strong>in</strong>itial value problem is equivalent to the <strong>in</strong>tegral equation (C.2).<br />

In the case of Theorem 13.1, we put A = J −1 (Q − λW ) and B = 0<br />

to get an equation of the form (C.1). We therefore need to show the<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g theorems.<br />

Theorem C.1. Suppose A has locally <strong>in</strong>tegrable, and H locally absolutely<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uous, elements. Then the <strong>in</strong>tegral equation (C.2) has a<br />

unique, locally absolutely cont<strong>in</strong>uous solution.<br />

Theorem C.2. Suppose that A depends analytically on a parameter<br />

λ, <strong>in</strong> the sense that there is a matrix A ′ (x, λ) which is locally <strong>in</strong>tegrable<br />

with respect to x, and such that <br />

1 | J h (A(x, λ+h)−A(x, λ))−A′ (x, λ)| →<br />

0 as h → 0, for all compact sub<strong>in</strong>tervals J of I, and all λ <strong>in</strong> some open<br />

set Ω ⊂ C. Then the solution u(x, λ) of (C.2) is analytic for λ ∈ Ω,<br />

locally uniformly <strong>in</strong> x.<br />

Proof of Theorem C.1. We will f<strong>in</strong>d a series expansion for the<br />

solution. To do this, we set u0 = H, and if uk is already def<strong>in</strong>ed, we set<br />

uk+1(x) = x<br />

c Auk. It is then clear that uk is def<strong>in</strong>ed for k = 0, 1, . . .<br />

<strong>in</strong>ductively, and all uk are (absolutely) cont<strong>in</strong>uous. I claim that<br />

sup|uk|<br />

≤ sup|H|<br />

[c,x] [c,x]<br />

1<br />

k!<br />

x c<br />

k |A|<br />

for k = 0, 1, . . . ,<br />

for x > c, and a similar <strong>in</strong>equality with c and x <strong>in</strong>terchanged for x < c.<br />

Here |·| denotes a norm on n-vectors, and also the correspond<strong>in</strong>g subord<strong>in</strong>ate<br />

matrix-norm (so that |Au| ≤ |A||u|). Indeed, the <strong>in</strong>equality<br />

is trivial for k = 0, and suppos<strong>in</strong>g it valid for k, we obta<strong>in</strong><br />

|uk+1(x)| ≤<br />

x<br />

c<br />

|A||uk| ≤ 1<br />

k! sup<br />

<br />

|H|<br />

[c,x]<br />

c<br />

x<br />

t k |A(t)| |A| dt<br />

=<br />

1<br />

c<br />

(k + 1)! sup<br />

[c,x]<br />

x |H|<br />

c<br />

k+1 |A| ,<br />

for c < x, and a similar <strong>in</strong>equality for x < c. It follows that the series<br />

u = ∞<br />

k=0 uk is absolutely and uniformly convergent on any compact

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!