06.04.2013 Views

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

13. FIRST ORDER SYSTEMS 95<br />

and (u2, v2) ∈ T1. Then the boundary form (cf. Chapter 9) is<br />

<br />

(13.3) 〈(u1, v1), U(u2, v2)〉 = i<br />

<br />

= i<br />

I<br />

I<br />

(v ∗ 2W u1 − u ∗ 2W v1)<br />

((Ju ′ 2 + Qu2) ∗ u1 − u ∗ 2(Ju ′ 1 + Qu1))<br />

<br />

= −i<br />

I<br />

(u ∗ 2Ju1) ′ = −i lim<br />

K→I [u ∗ 2Ju1]K,<br />

the limit be<strong>in</strong>g taken over compact sub<strong>in</strong>tervals K of I. We must<br />

restrict T1 so that this vanishes. Like <strong>in</strong> Chapter 10 this means that<br />

the restriction of T1 to a selfadjo<strong>in</strong>t relation T is obta<strong>in</strong>ed by boundary<br />

conditions s<strong>in</strong>ce the limit clearly only depends on the values of u1 and<br />

u2 <strong>in</strong> arbitrarily small neighborhoods of the endpo<strong>in</strong>ts of I.<br />

An endpo<strong>in</strong>t is called regular if it is a f<strong>in</strong>ite number and Q and W<br />

are <strong>in</strong>tegrable near the endpo<strong>in</strong>t. Otherwise the endpo<strong>in</strong>t is s<strong>in</strong>gular.<br />

If both endpo<strong>in</strong>ts are regular, we aga<strong>in</strong> say that we are deal<strong>in</strong>g with<br />

a regular problem. We have a s<strong>in</strong>gular problem if at least one of the<br />

endpo<strong>in</strong>ts is <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite, or if at least one of Q and W is not <strong>in</strong>tegrable on<br />

I.<br />

Consider now the regular case. S<strong>in</strong>ce it is clear that both deficiency<br />

<strong>in</strong>dices equal n <strong>in</strong> the regular case there are always selfadjo<strong>in</strong>t<br />

realizations. To see what they look like, let ũ be the boundary value<br />

<br />

of (u, v) ∈ T1, i.e., ũ =<br />

so that the<br />

u(a)<br />

u(b)<br />

<br />

. Also put B = iJ 0<br />

0 −iJ<br />

boundary form is ũ ∗ 2Bũ1. Now if u ∈ Di then 〈u, Uu〉 = 〈u, u〉 so that<br />

the boundary form is positive def<strong>in</strong>ite on Di. Similarly it is negative<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ite on D−i (cf., Corollary 9.17). S<strong>in</strong>ce dim Di ⊕D−i = 2n the rank<br />

of the boundary form is 2n on this space so that the boundary values<br />

of this space, and a fortiori those of T1, range through all of C 2n . S<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

〈T1, UT0〉 = 0 it follows that the boundary value of any element of T0<br />

is 0.<br />

Conversely, to guarantee that 〈T1, Uu〉 = 0 for some u ∈ T1 it is<br />

obviously enough that the boundary value of u vanishes. Hence the<br />

m<strong>in</strong>imal relation consists exactly of those elements of the maximal relation<br />

which have boundary value 0. It is now clear that any maximal<br />

symmetric restriction of T1 is obta<strong>in</strong>ed by restrict<strong>in</strong>g the boundary<br />

values to a maximal subspace of C 2n for which the boundary form vanishes,<br />

a so called maximal isotropic space for B. We know, s<strong>in</strong>ce the<br />

deficiency <strong>in</strong>dices are f<strong>in</strong>ite and equal, that all such maximal symmetric<br />

restrictions are actually selfadjo<strong>in</strong>t (Corollary 9.15). S<strong>in</strong>ce the problem<br />

of f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g maximal isotropic spaces of B is a purely algebraic one<br />

we consider the problem of identify<strong>in</strong>g all selfadjo<strong>in</strong>t restrictions of T1<br />

solved <strong>in</strong> the regular case. See also Exercise 13.4.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!