Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space
Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space
Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
13. FIRST ORDER SYSTEMS 95<br />
and (u2, v2) ∈ T1. Then the boundary form (cf. Chapter 9) is<br />
<br />
(13.3) 〈(u1, v1), U(u2, v2)〉 = i<br />
<br />
= i<br />
I<br />
I<br />
(v ∗ 2W u1 − u ∗ 2W v1)<br />
((Ju ′ 2 + Qu2) ∗ u1 − u ∗ 2(Ju ′ 1 + Qu1))<br />
<br />
= −i<br />
I<br />
(u ∗ 2Ju1) ′ = −i lim<br />
K→I [u ∗ 2Ju1]K,<br />
the limit be<strong>in</strong>g taken over compact sub<strong>in</strong>tervals K of I. We must<br />
restrict T1 so that this vanishes. Like <strong>in</strong> Chapter 10 this means that<br />
the restriction of T1 to a selfadjo<strong>in</strong>t relation T is obta<strong>in</strong>ed by boundary<br />
conditions s<strong>in</strong>ce the limit clearly only depends on the values of u1 and<br />
u2 <strong>in</strong> arbitrarily small neighborhoods of the endpo<strong>in</strong>ts of I.<br />
An endpo<strong>in</strong>t is called regular if it is a f<strong>in</strong>ite number and Q and W<br />
are <strong>in</strong>tegrable near the endpo<strong>in</strong>t. Otherwise the endpo<strong>in</strong>t is s<strong>in</strong>gular.<br />
If both endpo<strong>in</strong>ts are regular, we aga<strong>in</strong> say that we are deal<strong>in</strong>g with<br />
a regular problem. We have a s<strong>in</strong>gular problem if at least one of the<br />
endpo<strong>in</strong>ts is <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite, or if at least one of Q and W is not <strong>in</strong>tegrable on<br />
I.<br />
Consider now the regular case. S<strong>in</strong>ce it is clear that both deficiency<br />
<strong>in</strong>dices equal n <strong>in</strong> the regular case there are always selfadjo<strong>in</strong>t<br />
realizations. To see what they look like, let ũ be the boundary value<br />
<br />
of (u, v) ∈ T1, i.e., ũ =<br />
so that the<br />
u(a)<br />
u(b)<br />
<br />
. Also put B = iJ 0<br />
0 −iJ<br />
boundary form is ũ ∗ 2Bũ1. Now if u ∈ Di then 〈u, Uu〉 = 〈u, u〉 so that<br />
the boundary form is positive def<strong>in</strong>ite on Di. Similarly it is negative<br />
def<strong>in</strong>ite on D−i (cf., Corollary 9.17). S<strong>in</strong>ce dim Di ⊕D−i = 2n the rank<br />
of the boundary form is 2n on this space so that the boundary values<br />
of this space, and a fortiori those of T1, range through all of C 2n . S<strong>in</strong>ce<br />
〈T1, UT0〉 = 0 it follows that the boundary value of any element of T0<br />
is 0.<br />
Conversely, to guarantee that 〈T1, Uu〉 = 0 for some u ∈ T1 it is<br />
obviously enough that the boundary value of u vanishes. Hence the<br />
m<strong>in</strong>imal relation consists exactly of those elements of the maximal relation<br />
which have boundary value 0. It is now clear that any maximal<br />
symmetric restriction of T1 is obta<strong>in</strong>ed by restrict<strong>in</strong>g the boundary<br />
values to a maximal subspace of C 2n for which the boundary form vanishes,<br />
a so called maximal isotropic space for B. We know, s<strong>in</strong>ce the<br />
deficiency <strong>in</strong>dices are f<strong>in</strong>ite and equal, that all such maximal symmetric<br />
restrictions are actually selfadjo<strong>in</strong>t (Corollary 9.15). S<strong>in</strong>ce the problem<br />
of f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g maximal isotropic spaces of B is a purely algebraic one<br />
we consider the problem of identify<strong>in</strong>g all selfadjo<strong>in</strong>t restrictions of T1<br />
solved <strong>in</strong> the regular case. See also Exercise 13.4.