06.04.2013 Views

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

86 12. INVERSE SPECTRAL THEORY<br />

easy estimates give<br />

g(x) ≤ c(λ)<br />

|k|<br />

x<br />

0<br />

|q| + 1<br />

|k|<br />

x<br />

0<br />

|q|g,<br />

where c(λ) = |u(0)| + |u ′ (0)|/|k|. Integrat<strong>in</strong>g after multiply<strong>in</strong>g by the<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g factor |q(x)| exp(− x<br />

|q|/|k|) we obta<strong>in</strong><br />

0<br />

g(x) ≤ c(λ)(e x<br />

0 |q|/√ |λ| − 1).<br />

The estimate for u follows immediately from this. <br />

Proof of Theorem 12.2. As noted, we only need to prove the<br />

theorem for α = 0, so assume this. Now let λ = rµ, where µ is <strong>in</strong><br />

some fixed, compact subset of C \ R, and r > 0 is large. We def<strong>in</strong>e<br />

ϕr(x, µ) = √ rϕ(x/ √ r, rµ) and θr(x, µ) = θ(x/ √ r, rµ). Then ϕr and<br />

θr satisfy the <strong>in</strong>itial conditions (12.3) for α = 0 and satisfy the equation<br />

−u ′′ + qru = µu on (0, b √ r), where qr(x) = q(x/ √ r)/r (check!!). From<br />

Lemma 12.3 it immediately follows that, locally uniformly <strong>in</strong> x, µ, we<br />

have ϕr(x, µ) → s<strong>in</strong>h(x√−µ) √ and θr(x, µ) → cosh(x −µ<br />

√ −µ) as r → ∞.<br />

Now let mr(µ) = m(rµ)<br />

√ r and make a change of variable x = y/ √ r <strong>in</strong><br />

(11.2). This gives b √ r<br />

|θr + mrϕr| 0<br />

2 = Im(mr(µ))/ Im µ, so if c > 0 we<br />

have<br />

(12.6)<br />

c<br />

0<br />

|θr(·, µ) + mr(µ)ϕr(·, µ)| 2 ≤<br />

Im mr(µ)<br />

Im µ<br />

as soon as b √ r ≥ c. The <strong>in</strong>equality may be rewritten as<br />

|mr(µ) − Cr| ≤ Rr,<br />

where Cr and Rr are easily expressed <strong>in</strong> terms of c<br />

0 θrϕr, c<br />

0 |θr| 2 <br />

and<br />

c<br />

0 |ϕr| 2 . The <strong>in</strong>equality therefore conf<strong>in</strong>es mr to a disk Kr(c), and is<br />

clear from Lemma 12.3 that as r → ∞ the coefficients converge, locally<br />

uniformly for µ ∈ C \ R, to those <strong>in</strong> the correspond<strong>in</strong>g disk K(c) for<br />

the case q = 0. Therefore, given any neighborhood Ω of K(c), we must<br />

have mr(µ) ∈ Ω for all sufficiently large r.<br />

This is true for any c > 0, and it is obvious from (12.6) that K(c)<br />

decreases as a function of c. We shall show presently that only the<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t − √ −µ is common to all K(c), and then it follows that mr(µ) →<br />

− √ −µ, locally uniformly for µ ∈ C \ R. But this means that m(λ) =<br />

− √ −λ(1 + o(1)) as λ → ∞ <strong>in</strong> a closed, non-real sector with vertex at<br />

the orig<strong>in</strong>, and thus proves the theorem.<br />

It rema<strong>in</strong>s to show that ∩c>0K(c) = − √ −µ. But any po<strong>in</strong>t ℓ<br />

<strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tersection corresponds to a solution u(x) = cosh(x √ −µ) +<br />

ℓ s<strong>in</strong>h(x √ −µ)/ √ −µ with u ∈ L 2 (0, ∞), s<strong>in</strong>ce we have c<br />

0 |u|2 ≤<br />

Im ℓ<br />

Im µ for<br />

all c > 0. Thus the only possible value is ℓ = − √ −µ. On the other

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!