Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space
Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space
Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
86 12. INVERSE SPECTRAL THEORY<br />
easy estimates give<br />
g(x) ≤ c(λ)<br />
|k|<br />
x<br />
0<br />
|q| + 1<br />
|k|<br />
x<br />
0<br />
|q|g,<br />
where c(λ) = |u(0)| + |u ′ (0)|/|k|. Integrat<strong>in</strong>g after multiply<strong>in</strong>g by the<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g factor |q(x)| exp(− x<br />
|q|/|k|) we obta<strong>in</strong><br />
0<br />
g(x) ≤ c(λ)(e x<br />
0 |q|/√ |λ| − 1).<br />
The estimate for u follows immediately from this. <br />
Proof of Theorem 12.2. As noted, we only need to prove the<br />
theorem for α = 0, so assume this. Now let λ = rµ, where µ is <strong>in</strong><br />
some fixed, compact subset of C \ R, and r > 0 is large. We def<strong>in</strong>e<br />
ϕr(x, µ) = √ rϕ(x/ √ r, rµ) and θr(x, µ) = θ(x/ √ r, rµ). Then ϕr and<br />
θr satisfy the <strong>in</strong>itial conditions (12.3) for α = 0 and satisfy the equation<br />
−u ′′ + qru = µu on (0, b √ r), where qr(x) = q(x/ √ r)/r (check!!). From<br />
Lemma 12.3 it immediately follows that, locally uniformly <strong>in</strong> x, µ, we<br />
have ϕr(x, µ) → s<strong>in</strong>h(x√−µ) √ and θr(x, µ) → cosh(x −µ<br />
√ −µ) as r → ∞.<br />
Now let mr(µ) = m(rµ)<br />
√ r and make a change of variable x = y/ √ r <strong>in</strong><br />
(11.2). This gives b √ r<br />
|θr + mrϕr| 0<br />
2 = Im(mr(µ))/ Im µ, so if c > 0 we<br />
have<br />
(12.6)<br />
c<br />
0<br />
|θr(·, µ) + mr(µ)ϕr(·, µ)| 2 ≤<br />
Im mr(µ)<br />
Im µ<br />
as soon as b √ r ≥ c. The <strong>in</strong>equality may be rewritten as<br />
|mr(µ) − Cr| ≤ Rr,<br />
where Cr and Rr are easily expressed <strong>in</strong> terms of c<br />
0 θrϕr, c<br />
0 |θr| 2 <br />
and<br />
c<br />
0 |ϕr| 2 . The <strong>in</strong>equality therefore conf<strong>in</strong>es mr to a disk Kr(c), and is<br />
clear from Lemma 12.3 that as r → ∞ the coefficients converge, locally<br />
uniformly for µ ∈ C \ R, to those <strong>in</strong> the correspond<strong>in</strong>g disk K(c) for<br />
the case q = 0. Therefore, given any neighborhood Ω of K(c), we must<br />
have mr(µ) ∈ Ω for all sufficiently large r.<br />
This is true for any c > 0, and it is obvious from (12.6) that K(c)<br />
decreases as a function of c. We shall show presently that only the<br />
po<strong>in</strong>t − √ −µ is common to all K(c), and then it follows that mr(µ) →<br />
− √ −µ, locally uniformly for µ ∈ C \ R. But this means that m(λ) =<br />
− √ −λ(1 + o(1)) as λ → ∞ <strong>in</strong> a closed, non-real sector with vertex at<br />
the orig<strong>in</strong>, and thus proves the theorem.<br />
It rema<strong>in</strong>s to show that ∩c>0K(c) = − √ −µ. But any po<strong>in</strong>t ℓ<br />
<strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tersection corresponds to a solution u(x) = cosh(x √ −µ) +<br />
ℓ s<strong>in</strong>h(x √ −µ)/ √ −µ with u ∈ L 2 (0, ∞), s<strong>in</strong>ce we have c<br />
0 |u|2 ≤<br />
Im ℓ<br />
Im µ for<br />
all c > 0. Thus the only possible value is ℓ = − √ −µ. On the other