06.04.2013 Views

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

60 10. BOUNDARY CONDITIONS<br />

the same way. This will of course <strong>in</strong>clude the more general Sturm-<br />

Liouville equation (10.1).<br />

We shall study (10.3) <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Hilbert</strong> space L 2 (I) where I is an<br />

<strong>in</strong>terval and the function q is real-valued and locally <strong>in</strong>tegrable <strong>in</strong> I,<br />

i.e., <strong>in</strong>tegrable on every compact sub<strong>in</strong>terval of I. In L 2 (I) the scalar<br />

product is 〈u, v〉 = <br />

I uv.<br />

Before we beg<strong>in</strong> we need to quote a few standard facts about Sturm-<br />

Liouville equations. Basic for what follows is the follow<strong>in</strong>g existence<br />

and uniqueness theorem.<br />

Theorem 10.1. Suppose q is locally <strong>in</strong>tegrable <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>terval I and<br />

that c ∈ I. Then, for any locally <strong>in</strong>tegrable function f and arbitrary<br />

complex constants A, B and λ the <strong>in</strong>itial value problem<br />

<br />

−u ′′ + qu = λu + f <strong>in</strong> I,<br />

u(c) = A, u ′ (c) = B<br />

has a unique, cont<strong>in</strong>uously differentiable solution u with locally absolutely<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uous derivative def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> I. If A, B are <strong>in</strong>dependent of λ<br />

the solution u(x, λ) and its x-derivative will be entire functions of λ,<br />

locally uniformly <strong>in</strong> x.<br />

We shall use this only if f is actually locally square <strong>in</strong>tegrable. The<br />

theorem has the follow<strong>in</strong>g immediate consequence.<br />

Corollary 10.2. Let q, λ and I be as <strong>in</strong> Theorem 10.1. Then the<br />

set of solutions to −u ′′ + qu = λu <strong>in</strong> I is a 2-dimensional l<strong>in</strong>ear space.<br />

If one rewrites −u ′′ + qu = λu + f as a first order system accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to the prescription before (10.1), then Theorem 10.1 and Corollary 10.2<br />

become special cases of the theorems for first order systems given <strong>in</strong><br />

Appendix C.<br />

In order to get a spectral theory for (10.3) we need to def<strong>in</strong>e a m<strong>in</strong>imal<br />

operator, show that it is densely def<strong>in</strong>ed and symmetric, calculate<br />

its adjo<strong>in</strong>t and f<strong>in</strong>d the selfadjo<strong>in</strong>t restrictions of the adjo<strong>in</strong>t.<br />

We def<strong>in</strong>e Tc to be the operator u ↦→ −u ′′ +qu with doma<strong>in</strong> consist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of those cont<strong>in</strong>uously differentiable functions u which have compact<br />

support, i.e., they are zero outside some compact sub<strong>in</strong>terval of the <strong>in</strong>terior<br />

of I, and which are such that u ′ is locally absolutely cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />

with −u ′′ + qu ∈ L 2 (I).<br />

We will show that Tc is densely def<strong>in</strong>ed and symmetric and then<br />

calculate its adjo<strong>in</strong>t, but first need some preparation. If u, v are differentiable<br />

functions we def<strong>in</strong>e [u, v] = u(x)v ′ (x) − u ′ (x)v(x). This is<br />

called the Wronskian of u and v. It is clear that [u, v] = −[v, u], <strong>in</strong><br />

particular [u, u] = 0. The follow<strong>in</strong>g elementary fact is very important.<br />

Proposition 10.3. If u and v are l<strong>in</strong>early <strong>in</strong>dependent solutions of<br />

−v ′′ + qv = λv on I, then the Wronskian [u, v] is a non-zero constant<br />

on I.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!