Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space
Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space
Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
8. COMPACTNESS 47<br />
A natural question is now: How do I, <strong>in</strong> a concrete case, recognize<br />
that an operator is compact? One class of compact operators which<br />
are sometimes easy to recognize, are the <strong>Hilbert</strong>-Schmidt operators.<br />
Def<strong>in</strong>ition 8.5. A : H → H is called a <strong>Hilbert</strong>-Schmidt operator if<br />
for some complete orthonormal sequence e1, e2, . . . we have Aej 2 <<br />
∞. The number ||A|| = Aej 2 is called the <strong>Hilbert</strong>-Schmidt norm<br />
of A.<br />
Lemma 8.6. ||A|| is <strong>in</strong>dependent of the particular complete orthonormal<br />
sequence used <strong>in</strong> the def<strong>in</strong>ition, it is a norm, ||A|| = |||A ∗ ||, and<br />
any <strong>Hilbert</strong>-Schmidt operator is compact. The set of <strong>Hilbert</strong>-Schmidt<br />
operators on H is a <strong>Hilbert</strong> space <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Hilbert</strong>-Schmidt norm.<br />
Proof. It is clear that ||| · || is a norm. Now suppose {ej} ∞ 1 and<br />
{fj} ∞ 1 are arbitrary complete orthonormal sequences. Us<strong>in</strong>g Parseval’s<br />
formula twice it follows that <br />
jAej2 = <br />
j,k |〈Aej, fk〉| 2 =<br />
<br />
j,k |〈ej, A∗fk〉| 2 = <br />
kA∗fk2 . Thus the <strong>Hilbert</strong>-Schmidt norm has<br />
the claimed properties. To see that A is compact, suppose uj ⇀ 0 and<br />
let ε > 0. Choose N so large that ∞<br />
N A∗ ej 2 < ε and let C be a<br />
bound for the sequence {uj} ∞ 1 . By Parseval’s formula we then have<br />
Auk 2 = |〈Auk, ej〉| 2 = |〈uk, A ∗ ej〉| 2 . We obta<strong>in</strong><br />
Auk 2 ≤<br />
N<br />
1<br />
|〈uk, A ∗ ej〉| 2 + C 2 ε → C 2 ε<br />
as k → ∞ s<strong>in</strong>ce |〈uk, A ∗ ej〉| ≤ CA ∗ ej . It follows that Auk → 0<br />
so that A is compact. We leave the proof of the last statement as an<br />
exercise for the reader (Exercise 8.4). <br />
It is usual to consider a differential operator def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> some doma<strong>in</strong><br />
Ω ⊂ R n as an operator <strong>in</strong> the space L 2 (Ω, w) where w > 0 is<br />
measurable<br />
<br />
and the scalar product <strong>in</strong> the space is given by 〈u, v〉 =<br />
u(x)v(x)w(x) dx. In all reasonable cases the resolvent of such an<br />
Ω<br />
operator can be realized as an <strong>in</strong>tegral operator, i.e., an operator of<br />
the form<br />
<br />
(8.1) Au(x) = g(x, y)u(y)w(y) dy for x ∈ Ω.<br />
Ω<br />
The function g, def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Ω ×Ω, is called the <strong>in</strong>tegral kernel of the operator<br />
A. The <strong>in</strong>tegral kernel of the resolvent of a differential operator<br />
is usually called Green’s function for the operator.<br />
Theorem 8.7. Assume g(x, y) is measurable as a function of both<br />
its variables and that y ↦→ g(x, y) is <strong>in</strong> L 2 (Ω, w) for a.a. x ∈ Ω. Then<br />
the operator A of (8.1) is a <strong>Hilbert</strong>-Schmidt operator <strong>in</strong> L 2 (Ω, w) if and