06.04.2013 Views

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

11. STURM-LIOUVILLE EQUATIONS 73<br />

s<strong>in</strong>ce the other two terms obta<strong>in</strong>ed cancel. Thus v ′ (a) = cos α b<br />

uψ(·, λ)<br />

a<br />

so v satisfies the boundary condition at a. If x is to the right of the support<br />

of u we obta<strong>in</strong> v(x) = ψ(x, λ) b<br />

uϕ(·, λ) so that v also satisfies the<br />

a<br />

boundary condition at b, be<strong>in</strong>g a multiple of ψ near b. Differentiat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

aga<strong>in</strong> we obta<strong>in</strong><br />

−v ′′ (x) + (q(x) − λ)v(x) = [ψ, ϕ]u(x) = u(x).<br />

It follows that v = Rλu and, s<strong>in</strong>ce compactly supported functions are<br />

dense <strong>in</strong> L2 (a, b), that g(x, y, λ) is Green’s function for our operator.<br />

From (11.1) now follows that the kernel g1 is as stated.<br />

It rema<strong>in</strong>s to show that m is a Nevanl<strong>in</strong>na function. If u and v both<br />

have compact supports <strong>in</strong> I we have<br />

<br />

〈Rλu, v〉 = g(x, y, λ)u(y)v(x) dxdy,<br />

the double <strong>in</strong>tegral be<strong>in</strong>g absolutely convergent. Similarly<br />

<br />

〈u, Rλv〉 = g(y, x, λ)u(y)v(x) dxdy,<br />

and s<strong>in</strong>ce the <strong>in</strong>tegrals are equal for all u, v by Theorem 5.2.2 we obta<strong>in</strong><br />

g(x, y, λ) = g(y, x, λ) or, if x < y,<br />

ϕ(x, λ)θ(y, λ) + ϕ(x, λ)ϕ(y, λ)m(λ)<br />

= ϕ(x, λ)θ(y, λ) + ϕ(x, λ)ϕ(y, λ)m(λ),<br />

s<strong>in</strong>ce ϕ(·, λ) = ϕ(·, λ) and similarly for θ. S<strong>in</strong>ce ϕ(x, λ) = 0 for non-real<br />

λ (why?) it follows that m(λ) = m(λ). Now λ ↦→ Rλu(x) is analytic<br />

for non-real λ and for compactly supported u<br />

<br />

Rλu(x) = θ(x, λ)<br />

a<br />

x<br />

<br />

uϕ(·, λ) + ϕ(x, λ)<br />

x<br />

b<br />

uθ(·, λ)<br />

<br />

+ m(λ)ϕ(x, λ)<br />

a<br />

b<br />

uϕ(·, λ).<br />

The first two terms on the right are obviously entire functions accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to Theorem 10.1, as is the coefficient of m(λ), and s<strong>in</strong>ce by choice<br />

of u we may always assume that this coefficient is non-zero <strong>in</strong> a neighborhood<br />

of any given λ it follows that m(λ) is analytic for non-real<br />

λ.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, <strong>in</strong>tegration by parts shows that<br />

<br />

λ<br />

a<br />

x<br />

|ψ| 2 = −ψ ′ ψ x<br />

a +<br />

x<br />

a<br />

(|ψ ′ | 2 + q|ψ| 2 ).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!