06.04.2013 Views

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

108 15. SINGULAR PROBLEMS<br />

We will give an expansion theorem generaliz<strong>in</strong>g the Fourier series<br />

expansion obta<strong>in</strong>ed for a discrete spectrum. The first step is the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

lemma.<br />

Lemma 15.4. Let M(λ) be as <strong>in</strong> Theorem 15.2. Then there is a<br />

unique <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g and left-cont<strong>in</strong>uous matrix-valued function P with<br />

P (0) = 0 and unique Hermitian matrices A and B ≥ 0 such that<br />

(15.3) M(λ) = A + Bλ +<br />

∞<br />

−∞<br />

( 1 t<br />

−<br />

t − λ t2 ) dP (t).<br />

+ 1<br />

Proof. If S = F (c, λ) Theorem 15.2.(5) gives<br />

S(M(λ) − M(µ))S ∗ = (λ − µ)RλG ∗ (c, ·, µ)(c),<br />

where the constant matrix S is <strong>in</strong>vertible. Thus M(λ) is analytic <strong>in</strong><br />

ρ(T ), s<strong>in</strong>ce the resolvent Rλ : L2 W → C(K) is. Furthermore, for µ = λ<br />

non-real we obta<strong>in</strong><br />

1<br />

2i Im λ (M(λ) − M ∗ 1<br />

(λ)) = (M(λ) − M(λ))<br />

2i Im λ<br />

= S −1 〈G ∗ (c, ·, λ), G ∗ (c, ·, λ)〉W (S −1 ) ∗ ≥ 0.<br />

Thus M is a ‘matrix-valued Nevanl<strong>in</strong>na function’. We now obta<strong>in</strong><br />

the representation (15.3) by apply<strong>in</strong>g Theorem 6.1 to the Nevanl<strong>in</strong>na<br />

function m(λ, u) = u ∗ M(λ)u where u is an n × 1-matrix. Clearly the<br />

quantities α, β and ρ <strong>in</strong> the representation (6.1) are Hermitian forms<br />

<strong>in</strong> u, so (15.3) follows. <br />

The function P is called the spectral matrix for T . We now def<strong>in</strong>e<br />

the <strong>Hilbert</strong> space L2 P <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g way. We consider n × 1 matrixvalued<br />

Borel functions û, so that they are measurable with respect to<br />

all elements of dP , and for which the <strong>in</strong>tegral ∞<br />

−∞û∗ (t) dP (t) û(t) <<br />

∞. The elements of L2 P are equivalence classes of such functions, two<br />

functions u, v be<strong>in</strong>g equivalent if they are equal a.e. with respect to<br />

dP , i.e., if dP (u − v) has all elements equal to the zero measure. We<br />

denote the scalar product <strong>in</strong> this space by 〈·, ·〉P and the norm by<br />

·P . Note that one may write the scalar product <strong>in</strong> a somewhat more<br />

familiar way by us<strong>in</strong>g the Radon-Nikodym theorem to f<strong>in</strong>d a measure<br />

dµ with respect to which all the entries <strong>in</strong> dP are absolutely cont<strong>in</strong>uous;<br />

one may for example let dµ be the sum of all diagonal elements <strong>in</strong><br />

dP . One then has dP = Ω dµ, where Ω is a non-negative matrix of<br />

functions locally <strong>in</strong>tegrable with respect to dµ, and the scalar product<br />

is 〈û, ˆv〉P = ∞<br />

−∞ˆv∗ Ωû dµ. Alternatively, we def<strong>in</strong>e L2 P as the completion<br />

of compactly supported, cont<strong>in</strong>uous n×1 matrix-valued functions with<br />

respect to the norm ·P . These alternative def<strong>in</strong>itions give the same<br />

space (Exercise 15.2). The ma<strong>in</strong> result of this chapter is the follow<strong>in</strong>g.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!