Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space
Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space
Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
108 15. SINGULAR PROBLEMS<br />
We will give an expansion theorem generaliz<strong>in</strong>g the Fourier series<br />
expansion obta<strong>in</strong>ed for a discrete spectrum. The first step is the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
lemma.<br />
Lemma 15.4. Let M(λ) be as <strong>in</strong> Theorem 15.2. Then there is a<br />
unique <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g and left-cont<strong>in</strong>uous matrix-valued function P with<br />
P (0) = 0 and unique Hermitian matrices A and B ≥ 0 such that<br />
(15.3) M(λ) = A + Bλ +<br />
∞<br />
−∞<br />
( 1 t<br />
−<br />
t − λ t2 ) dP (t).<br />
+ 1<br />
Proof. If S = F (c, λ) Theorem 15.2.(5) gives<br />
S(M(λ) − M(µ))S ∗ = (λ − µ)RλG ∗ (c, ·, µ)(c),<br />
where the constant matrix S is <strong>in</strong>vertible. Thus M(λ) is analytic <strong>in</strong><br />
ρ(T ), s<strong>in</strong>ce the resolvent Rλ : L2 W → C(K) is. Furthermore, for µ = λ<br />
non-real we obta<strong>in</strong><br />
1<br />
2i Im λ (M(λ) − M ∗ 1<br />
(λ)) = (M(λ) − M(λ))<br />
2i Im λ<br />
= S −1 〈G ∗ (c, ·, λ), G ∗ (c, ·, λ)〉W (S −1 ) ∗ ≥ 0.<br />
Thus M is a ‘matrix-valued Nevanl<strong>in</strong>na function’. We now obta<strong>in</strong><br />
the representation (15.3) by apply<strong>in</strong>g Theorem 6.1 to the Nevanl<strong>in</strong>na<br />
function m(λ, u) = u ∗ M(λ)u where u is an n × 1-matrix. Clearly the<br />
quantities α, β and ρ <strong>in</strong> the representation (6.1) are Hermitian forms<br />
<strong>in</strong> u, so (15.3) follows. <br />
The function P is called the spectral matrix for T . We now def<strong>in</strong>e<br />
the <strong>Hilbert</strong> space L2 P <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g way. We consider n × 1 matrixvalued<br />
Borel functions û, so that they are measurable with respect to<br />
all elements of dP , and for which the <strong>in</strong>tegral ∞<br />
−∞û∗ (t) dP (t) û(t) <<br />
∞. The elements of L2 P are equivalence classes of such functions, two<br />
functions u, v be<strong>in</strong>g equivalent if they are equal a.e. with respect to<br />
dP , i.e., if dP (u − v) has all elements equal to the zero measure. We<br />
denote the scalar product <strong>in</strong> this space by 〈·, ·〉P and the norm by<br />
·P . Note that one may write the scalar product <strong>in</strong> a somewhat more<br />
familiar way by us<strong>in</strong>g the Radon-Nikodym theorem to f<strong>in</strong>d a measure<br />
dµ with respect to which all the entries <strong>in</strong> dP are absolutely cont<strong>in</strong>uous;<br />
one may for example let dµ be the sum of all diagonal elements <strong>in</strong><br />
dP . One then has dP = Ω dµ, where Ω is a non-negative matrix of<br />
functions locally <strong>in</strong>tegrable with respect to dµ, and the scalar product<br />
is 〈û, ˆv〉P = ∞<br />
−∞ˆv∗ Ωû dµ. Alternatively, we def<strong>in</strong>e L2 P as the completion<br />
of compactly supported, cont<strong>in</strong>uous n×1 matrix-valued functions with<br />
respect to the norm ·P . These alternative def<strong>in</strong>itions give the same<br />
space (Exercise 15.2). The ma<strong>in</strong> result of this chapter is the follow<strong>in</strong>g.