06.04.2013 Views

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

88 12. INVERSE SPECTRAL THEORY<br />

every ε > 0 as λ → ∞ along some non-real ray. Conversely, if α = ˜α<br />

and q = ˜q on (0, a), then (m(λ) − ˜m(λ))e 2(a−ε) Re √ −λ → 0 for every<br />

ε > 0 as λ → ∞ along any non-real ray.<br />

We will prove both theorems by the same method, the crucial po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

of which is the follow<strong>in</strong>g lemma.<br />

Lemma 12.6. For any fixed x ∈ (0, b) holds ϕ(x, λ)ψ(x, λ) → 0 as<br />

λ → ∞ along a non-real ray.<br />

Note that ϕ(x, λ)ψ(x, λ) is Green’s function on the diagonal x = y.<br />

We shall postpone the proof a moment and see how the theorem follows<br />

from it. We first have a corollary.<br />

Corollary 12.7. Suppose α = ˜α = 0 or α = 0 = ˜α. Then both<br />

˜ϕ(x, λ)ψ(x, λ) and ϕ(x, λ) ˜ ψ(x, λ) tend to 0 as λ → ∞ along a non-real<br />

ray, locally uniformly <strong>in</strong> x.<br />

Proof. Clearly (12.4) implies that for fixed x and ˜α = 0 we have<br />

ϕ(x, λ)/ ˜ϕ(x, λ) → s<strong>in</strong> α/ s<strong>in</strong> ˜α as λ → ∞<br />

along a non-real ray. If α = ˜α = 0 we <strong>in</strong>stead obta<strong>in</strong> the limit 1, so the<br />

corollary follows from Lemma 12.6. <br />

We shall also need a standard theorem from complex analysis, which<br />

is a slight elaboration of the maximum pr<strong>in</strong>ciple.<br />

Theorem 12.8 (Phragmén-L<strong>in</strong>delöf). Suppose f is analytic <strong>in</strong> a<br />

closed sector bounded by two rays from the orig<strong>in</strong>, that it is bounded on<br />

the rays, and that |f(z)| ≤ AeB|z|1/2 <strong>in</strong> the sector, for some constants<br />

A and B. Then f is bounded <strong>in</strong> the sector.<br />

This is just one of the simplest versions of a general class of theorems,<br />

which are all known under the names of Phragmén and L<strong>in</strong>delöf.<br />

Proofs are given <strong>in</strong> many textbooks on complex analysis, but for the<br />

reader’s convenience we also give a proof here.<br />

Proof. We may without loss of generality assume that the rays<br />

are given by the angles ±β. Let ε > 0 and F (z) = e−εzγ f(z), where<br />

1/2 < γ < π/(2β) and the branch of z γ is chosen to be positive real for<br />

positive real z. Now, for z = re ±iβ we have |F (z)| = e −εrγ cos(βγ) |f(z)|,<br />

where cos(βγ) > 0. Let M be a bound for f on the rays. Then we<br />

have |F (z)| ≤ M on the rays.<br />

For z = Re iδ with |δ| ≤ β we have<br />

|F (z)| ≤ A exp(BR 1/2 − εR γ cos(βγ))<br />

which tends to 0 as R → ∞. Thus, on all circular sectors bounded<br />

by the rays we have |F (z)| ≤ M on the boundary if the radius R is<br />

sufficiently large. By the maximum pr<strong>in</strong>ciple this also holds <strong>in</strong> the<br />

<strong>in</strong>terior of the circular sector. S<strong>in</strong>ce R can be chosen arbitrarily large,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!