06.04.2013 Views

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 7<br />

The spectral theorem<br />

Theorem 7.1. (<strong>Spectral</strong> theorem) Suppose T is selfadjo<strong>in</strong>t. Then<br />

there exists a unique, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g and left-cont<strong>in</strong>uous family {Et}t∈R of<br />

orthogonal projections with the follow<strong>in</strong>g properties:<br />

• Et commutes with T , <strong>in</strong> the sense that T Et is the closure of<br />

EtT .<br />

• Et → 0 as t → −∞ and Et → I (= identity on H) as t → ∞<br />

(strong convergence).<br />

• T = ∞<br />

−∞ t dEt <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g sense: u ∈ D(T ) if and only if<br />

∞<br />

∞<br />

−∞ t2 d〈Etu, u〉.<br />

−∞ t2 d〈Etu, u〉 < ∞, 〈T u, v〉 = ∞<br />

−∞ t d〈Etu, v〉 and T u 2 =<br />

The family {Et}t∈R of projections is called the resolution of the identity<br />

for T . The formula T = ∞<br />

−∞t dEt can be made sense of directly by<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g Stieltjes <strong>in</strong>tegrals with respect to operator-valued <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

functions. This is a simple generalization of the scalar-valued case.<br />

Although we then, formally, get a slightly stronger statement, it does<br />

not appear to be any more useful than the statement above. We will<br />

therefore omit this.<br />

For the proof we need two lemmas, the first of which actually conta<strong>in</strong>s<br />

the ma<strong>in</strong> step of the proof.<br />

Lemma 7.2. For f, g ∈ H there is a unique left-cont<strong>in</strong>uous function<br />

σf,g of bounded variation, with σf,g(−∞) = 0, and the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

properties:<br />

• σf,g is Hermitian <strong>in</strong> f, g ( i.e., σf,g = σg,f and is l<strong>in</strong>ear <strong>in</strong> f),<br />

and σf,f is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

• dσf,g is a bounded sesquil<strong>in</strong>ear form on H. In fact, we even<br />

have ∞<br />

−∞ |dσf,g| ≤ fg.<br />

• 〈Rλf, g〉 = ∞ dσf,g<br />

−∞ t−λ .<br />

Proof. The uniqueness of σf,g follows from the Stieltjes <strong>in</strong>version<br />

formula, applied to F (λ) = 〈Rλf, g〉. S<strong>in</strong>ce 〈Rλf, g〉 is sesqui-l<strong>in</strong>ear <strong>in</strong><br />

f, g and R ∗ λ = R λ , it then follows that σf,g is Hermitian if it exists.<br />

However, by Theorem 5.3 the function λ ↦→ 〈Rλf, f〉 is a Nevanl<strong>in</strong>na<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!