Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space
Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space
Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CHAPTER 7<br />
The spectral theorem<br />
Theorem 7.1. (<strong>Spectral</strong> theorem) Suppose T is selfadjo<strong>in</strong>t. Then<br />
there exists a unique, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g and left-cont<strong>in</strong>uous family {Et}t∈R of<br />
orthogonal projections with the follow<strong>in</strong>g properties:<br />
• Et commutes with T , <strong>in</strong> the sense that T Et is the closure of<br />
EtT .<br />
• Et → 0 as t → −∞ and Et → I (= identity on H) as t → ∞<br />
(strong convergence).<br />
• T = ∞<br />
−∞ t dEt <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g sense: u ∈ D(T ) if and only if<br />
∞<br />
∞<br />
−∞ t2 d〈Etu, u〉.<br />
−∞ t2 d〈Etu, u〉 < ∞, 〈T u, v〉 = ∞<br />
−∞ t d〈Etu, v〉 and T u 2 =<br />
The family {Et}t∈R of projections is called the resolution of the identity<br />
for T . The formula T = ∞<br />
−∞t dEt can be made sense of directly by<br />
<strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g Stieltjes <strong>in</strong>tegrals with respect to operator-valued <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />
functions. This is a simple generalization of the scalar-valued case.<br />
Although we then, formally, get a slightly stronger statement, it does<br />
not appear to be any more useful than the statement above. We will<br />
therefore omit this.<br />
For the proof we need two lemmas, the first of which actually conta<strong>in</strong>s<br />
the ma<strong>in</strong> step of the proof.<br />
Lemma 7.2. For f, g ∈ H there is a unique left-cont<strong>in</strong>uous function<br />
σf,g of bounded variation, with σf,g(−∞) = 0, and the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
properties:<br />
• σf,g is Hermitian <strong>in</strong> f, g ( i.e., σf,g = σg,f and is l<strong>in</strong>ear <strong>in</strong> f),<br />
and σf,f is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
• dσf,g is a bounded sesquil<strong>in</strong>ear form on H. In fact, we even<br />
have ∞<br />
−∞ |dσf,g| ≤ fg.<br />
• 〈Rλf, g〉 = ∞ dσf,g<br />
−∞ t−λ .<br />
Proof. The uniqueness of σf,g follows from the Stieltjes <strong>in</strong>version<br />
formula, applied to F (λ) = 〈Rλf, g〉. S<strong>in</strong>ce 〈Rλf, g〉 is sesqui-l<strong>in</strong>ear <strong>in</strong><br />
f, g and R ∗ λ = R λ , it then follows that σf,g is Hermitian if it exists.<br />
However, by Theorem 5.3 the function λ ↦→ 〈Rλf, f〉 is a Nevanl<strong>in</strong>na<br />
39