06.04.2013 Views

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

70 11. STURM-LIOUVILLE EQUATIONS<br />

function g(x, y, λ), which is <strong>in</strong> L 2 (I) as a function of y for every x ∈ I<br />

and such that Rλu(x) = 〈u, g(x, ·, λ)〉 for any u ∈ L 2 (I). There is also<br />

a kernel g1(x, y, λ) <strong>in</strong> L 2 (I) as a function of y for every x ∈ I such<br />

that (Rλu) ′ (x) = 〈u, g1(x, ·, λ)〉 for any u ∈ L 2 (I).<br />

Proof. We already noted that ρ(T ) ∋ λ ↦→ Rλ ∈ B(L 2 (I), D1) is<br />

analytic <strong>in</strong> the uniform operator topology. Furthermore, the restriction<br />

operator IK : D1 → C 1 (K) is bounded and <strong>in</strong>dependent of λ. Hence<br />

ρ(T ) ∋ λ → IKRλ is analytic <strong>in</strong> the uniform operator topology. In<br />

particular, for fixed λ ∈ ρ(T ) and any x ∈ I, the l<strong>in</strong>ear form L 2 (I) ∋<br />

u ↦→ (IKRλu)(x) = Rλu(x) is (locally uniformly) bounded. By Riesz’<br />

representation theorem we have Rλu(x) = 〈u, g(x, ·, λ)〉, where y ↦→<br />

g(x, y, λ) is <strong>in</strong> L 2 (I). Similarly, s<strong>in</strong>ce L 2 ∋ u ↦→ (Rλu) ′ (x) is a bounded<br />

l<strong>in</strong>ear form for each x ∈ I the kernel g1 exists. <br />

Among other th<strong>in</strong>gs, Theorem 11.1 tells us that if uj → u <strong>in</strong> L 2 (I),<br />

then Rλuj → Rλu <strong>in</strong> C 1 (K), so that Rλuj and its derivative converge<br />

locally uniformly. This is actually true even if uj just converges weakly,<br />

but all we need is the follow<strong>in</strong>g weaker result.<br />

Lemma 11.2. Suppose Rλ is the resolvent of a selfadjo<strong>in</strong>t relation T<br />

as above. Then if uj ⇀ 0 weakly <strong>in</strong> L 2 (I), it follows that both Rλuj → 0<br />

and (Rλuj) ′ → 0 po<strong>in</strong>twise and locally boundedly.<br />

Proof. Rλuj(x) = 〈uj, g(x, ·, λ)〉 → 0 s<strong>in</strong>ce y ↦→ g(x, y, λ) is <strong>in</strong><br />

L 2 (I) for any x ∈ I. Now let K be a compact sub<strong>in</strong>terval of I. A<br />

weakly convergent sequence <strong>in</strong> L 2 (I) is bounded, so s<strong>in</strong>ce Rλ maps<br />

L 2 (I) boundedly <strong>in</strong>to C 1 (K), it follows that Rλuj(x) is bounded <strong>in</strong>dependently<br />

of j and x for x ∈ K. Similarly for the sequence of derivatives.<br />

<br />

Corollary 11.3. If the <strong>in</strong>terval I is compact, then any selfadjo<strong>in</strong>t<br />

restriction T of T1 has compact resolvent. Hence T has a complete<br />

orthonormal sequence of eigenfunctions <strong>in</strong> L 2 (I).<br />

Proof. Suppose uj ⇀ 0 weakly <strong>in</strong> L 2 (I). If I is compact, then<br />

Lemma 11.2 implies that Rλuj → 0 po<strong>in</strong>twise and boundedly <strong>in</strong> I,<br />

and hence by dom<strong>in</strong>ated convergence Rλuj → 0 <strong>in</strong> L 2 (I). Thus Rλ is<br />

compact. The last statement follows from Theorem 8.3.<br />

For a different proof, see Corollary 11.7. <br />

If T has compact resolvent, then the generalized Fourier series of<br />

any u ∈ L 2 (I) converges to u <strong>in</strong> L 2 (I). For functions <strong>in</strong> the doma<strong>in</strong> of<br />

T much stronger convergence is obta<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />

Corollary 11.4. Suppose T has a complete orthonormal sequence<br />

of eigenfunctions <strong>in</strong> L 2 (I). If u is <strong>in</strong> the doma<strong>in</strong> of T , then the generalized<br />

Fourier series of u, as well as the differentiated series, converges<br />

locally uniformly <strong>in</strong> I. In particular, if I is compact, the convergence<br />

is uniform <strong>in</strong> I.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!