Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space
Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space
Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
114 15. SINGULAR PROBLEMS<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce vK → v <strong>in</strong> L2 W as K → R, it follows from Theorem 14.2 that<br />
uK → u <strong>in</strong> C(L) as K → R, for any compact sub<strong>in</strong>terval L of I. <br />
Example 15.14. Let us <strong>in</strong>terpret Theorem 15.5 for the case of<br />
the operator of Example 4.6, Green’s function of which is given <strong>in</strong><br />
Example 8.8. Compar<strong>in</strong>g (8.2) with (15.1), we see that M(λ) = i/2 for<br />
λ <strong>in</strong> the upper half plane. By Lemma 6.5 the correspond<strong>in</strong>g spectral<br />
measure is P (t) = limε→0 1<br />
t<br />
t<br />
Im M(µ + iε) dµ = . This means that<br />
π 0 2π<br />
if f ∈ L2 (R), then as a, b → ∞ the <strong>in</strong>tegral b<br />
−a f(x) e−ixt dt converges<br />
<strong>in</strong> the sense of L2 (R) to a function ˆ f ∈ L2 (R). Furthermore the <strong>in</strong>tegral<br />
<br />
1 b<br />
2π −a ˆ f(t) eixt dt converges <strong>in</strong> the same sense to f as a and b → ∞.<br />
We also conclude that ∞<br />
−∞ |f|2 = 1<br />
∞<br />
2π −∞ | ˆ f| 2 . F<strong>in</strong>ally, if f is locally<br />
absolutely cont<strong>in</strong>uous and together with its derivative <strong>in</strong> L2 (R), then<br />
the transform of −if ′ is t ˆ f(t) and conversely, if ˆ f and t ˆ f(t) are both <strong>in</strong><br />
L2 (R), then the <strong>in</strong>verse transform of ˆ f is locally absolutely cont<strong>in</strong>uous,<br />
and its derivative is <strong>in</strong> L2 (R) and is the <strong>in</strong>verse transform of it ˆ f(t). We<br />
also get from Theorem 15.13 that if f has these properties, then the<br />
<strong>in</strong>verse transform of ˆ f converges absolutely and locally uniformly to f.<br />
Actually, it is here easy to see that the convergence is uniform on the<br />
whole axis, but nevertheless it is clear that we have retrieved all the<br />
basic properties of the classical Fourier transform.<br />
Exercises for Chapter 15<br />
Exercise 15.1. Use, e.g., estimates <strong>in</strong> the variation of constants<br />
formula Lemma 13.4 for v = (λ − µ)u to show that all columns of<br />
F (x, µ) are <strong>in</strong> L2 W , then so are those of F (x, λ).<br />
Exercise 15.2. Show that the two def<strong>in</strong>itions of L2 P given <strong>in</strong> the<br />
text are equivalent. What needs to be proved is that any measurable<br />
n × 1 matrix-valued function with f<strong>in</strong>ite norm can be approximated <strong>in</strong><br />
norm by a similar function which is C∞ 0 .<br />
H<strong>in</strong>t: Use a cut off and convolution with a C ∞ 0 -function of small support.<br />
Exercise 15.3. In Lemma 15.9 is claimed that for every compact<br />
<strong>in</strong>terval K the <strong>in</strong>tegral <br />
K F (x, t) dP (t) û(t) ∈ HT , but this is never<br />
proved; or is it? Clarify this po<strong>in</strong>t!<br />
Exercise 15.4. Consider, as <strong>in</strong> the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of Chapter 10, the<br />
first order system correspond<strong>in</strong>g to a general Sturm-Liouville equation<br />
−(pu ′ ) ′ + qu = λwu on [a, b),<br />
where 1/p, q and w are <strong>in</strong>tegrable on any <strong>in</strong>terval [a, x], x ∈ (a, b).<br />
Also assume that p and q are real-valued functions and w ≥ 0 and not<br />
a.e. equal to 0. Consider a selfadjo<strong>in</strong>t realization given by separated