06.04.2013 Views

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

114 15. SINGULAR PROBLEMS<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce vK → v <strong>in</strong> L2 W as K → R, it follows from Theorem 14.2 that<br />

uK → u <strong>in</strong> C(L) as K → R, for any compact sub<strong>in</strong>terval L of I. <br />

Example 15.14. Let us <strong>in</strong>terpret Theorem 15.5 for the case of<br />

the operator of Example 4.6, Green’s function of which is given <strong>in</strong><br />

Example 8.8. Compar<strong>in</strong>g (8.2) with (15.1), we see that M(λ) = i/2 for<br />

λ <strong>in</strong> the upper half plane. By Lemma 6.5 the correspond<strong>in</strong>g spectral<br />

measure is P (t) = limε→0 1<br />

t<br />

t<br />

Im M(µ + iε) dµ = . This means that<br />

π 0 2π<br />

if f ∈ L2 (R), then as a, b → ∞ the <strong>in</strong>tegral b<br />

−a f(x) e−ixt dt converges<br />

<strong>in</strong> the sense of L2 (R) to a function ˆ f ∈ L2 (R). Furthermore the <strong>in</strong>tegral<br />

<br />

1 b<br />

2π −a ˆ f(t) eixt dt converges <strong>in</strong> the same sense to f as a and b → ∞.<br />

We also conclude that ∞<br />

−∞ |f|2 = 1<br />

∞<br />

2π −∞ | ˆ f| 2 . F<strong>in</strong>ally, if f is locally<br />

absolutely cont<strong>in</strong>uous and together with its derivative <strong>in</strong> L2 (R), then<br />

the transform of −if ′ is t ˆ f(t) and conversely, if ˆ f and t ˆ f(t) are both <strong>in</strong><br />

L2 (R), then the <strong>in</strong>verse transform of ˆ f is locally absolutely cont<strong>in</strong>uous,<br />

and its derivative is <strong>in</strong> L2 (R) and is the <strong>in</strong>verse transform of it ˆ f(t). We<br />

also get from Theorem 15.13 that if f has these properties, then the<br />

<strong>in</strong>verse transform of ˆ f converges absolutely and locally uniformly to f.<br />

Actually, it is here easy to see that the convergence is uniform on the<br />

whole axis, but nevertheless it is clear that we have retrieved all the<br />

basic properties of the classical Fourier transform.<br />

Exercises for Chapter 15<br />

Exercise 15.1. Use, e.g., estimates <strong>in</strong> the variation of constants<br />

formula Lemma 13.4 for v = (λ − µ)u to show that all columns of<br />

F (x, µ) are <strong>in</strong> L2 W , then so are those of F (x, λ).<br />

Exercise 15.2. Show that the two def<strong>in</strong>itions of L2 P given <strong>in</strong> the<br />

text are equivalent. What needs to be proved is that any measurable<br />

n × 1 matrix-valued function with f<strong>in</strong>ite norm can be approximated <strong>in</strong><br />

norm by a similar function which is C∞ 0 .<br />

H<strong>in</strong>t: Use a cut off and convolution with a C ∞ 0 -function of small support.<br />

Exercise 15.3. In Lemma 15.9 is claimed that for every compact<br />

<strong>in</strong>terval K the <strong>in</strong>tegral <br />

K F (x, t) dP (t) û(t) ∈ HT , but this is never<br />

proved; or is it? Clarify this po<strong>in</strong>t!<br />

Exercise 15.4. Consider, as <strong>in</strong> the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of Chapter 10, the<br />

first order system correspond<strong>in</strong>g to a general Sturm-Liouville equation<br />

−(pu ′ ) ′ + qu = λwu on [a, b),<br />

where 1/p, q and w are <strong>in</strong>tegrable on any <strong>in</strong>terval [a, x], x ∈ (a, b).<br />

Also assume that p and q are real-valued functions and w ≥ 0 and not<br />

a.e. equal to 0. Consider a selfadjo<strong>in</strong>t realization given by separated

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!