06.04.2013 Views

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

38 6. NEVANLINNA FUNCTIONS<br />

Proof. By absolute convergence we may change the order of <strong>in</strong>tegration<br />

<strong>in</strong> the last <strong>in</strong>tegral. The <strong>in</strong>ner <strong>in</strong>tegral is then easily calculated<br />

to be<br />

1<br />

(arctan((x − t)/ε) − arctan((y − t)/ε)).<br />

π<br />

This is bounded by 1, and also by a constant multiple of 1/t2 if ε is<br />

bounded (verify this!). Furthermore it converges po<strong>in</strong>twise to 0 outside<br />

[y, x], and to 1 <strong>in</strong> (y, x) (and to 1 for t = x and t = y). The theorem<br />

2<br />

follows by dom<strong>in</strong>ated convergence. <br />

Proof of Theorem 6.1. The uniqueness of ρ follows immediately<br />

on apply<strong>in</strong>g the Stieltjes <strong>in</strong>version formula to the imag<strong>in</strong>ary part<br />

of (6.1) for λ = s + iε.<br />

We obta<strong>in</strong> (6.1) from the Riesz-Herglotz theorem by a change of<br />

variable. The mapp<strong>in</strong>g z = 1+iλ maps the upper half plane bijectively<br />

1−iλ<br />

to the unit disk, so G(z) = −iF (λ) is def<strong>in</strong>ed for z <strong>in</strong> the unit disk<br />

and has positive real part. Apply<strong>in</strong>g Theorem 6.3 we obta<strong>in</strong>, after<br />

simplification,<br />

F (λ) = Re F (i) + 1<br />

2π<br />

π<br />

−π<br />

1 + λ tan(θ/2)<br />

tan(θ/2) − λ<br />

dσ(θ) .<br />

Sett<strong>in</strong>g t = tan(θ/2) maps the open <strong>in</strong>terval (−π, π) onto the real axis.<br />

For θ = ±π the <strong>in</strong>tegrand equals λ, so any mass of σ at ±π gives rise<br />

to a term βλ with β ≥ 0. After the change of variable we get<br />

<br />

F (λ) = α + βλ +<br />

∞<br />

−∞<br />

1 + tλ<br />

t − λ<br />

dτ(t) ,<br />

where we have set α = Re F (i) and τ(t) = σ(θ)/(2π). S<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

1 + tλ<br />

t − λ =<br />

<br />

1 t<br />

−<br />

t − λ 1 + t2 <br />

(1 + t 2 )<br />

we now obta<strong>in</strong> (6.1) by sett<strong>in</strong>g ρ(t) = t<br />

0 (1 + s2 ) dτ(s).<br />

It rema<strong>in</strong>s to show the uniqueness of α and β. However, sett<strong>in</strong>g<br />

λ = i, it is clear that α = Re F (i), and s<strong>in</strong>ce we already know that ρ<br />

is unique, so is β. <br />

Actually one can calculate β directly from F s<strong>in</strong>ce by dom<strong>in</strong>ated<br />

convergence Im F (iν)/ν → β as ν → ∞. It is usual to refer to β as the<br />

‘mass at <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ity’, an expression expla<strong>in</strong>ed by our proof. Note, however,<br />

that it is the mass of τ at <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ity and not that of ρ!

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!