Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space
Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space
Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
38 6. NEVANLINNA FUNCTIONS<br />
Proof. By absolute convergence we may change the order of <strong>in</strong>tegration<br />
<strong>in</strong> the last <strong>in</strong>tegral. The <strong>in</strong>ner <strong>in</strong>tegral is then easily calculated<br />
to be<br />
1<br />
(arctan((x − t)/ε) − arctan((y − t)/ε)).<br />
π<br />
This is bounded by 1, and also by a constant multiple of 1/t2 if ε is<br />
bounded (verify this!). Furthermore it converges po<strong>in</strong>twise to 0 outside<br />
[y, x], and to 1 <strong>in</strong> (y, x) (and to 1 for t = x and t = y). The theorem<br />
2<br />
follows by dom<strong>in</strong>ated convergence. <br />
Proof of Theorem 6.1. The uniqueness of ρ follows immediately<br />
on apply<strong>in</strong>g the Stieltjes <strong>in</strong>version formula to the imag<strong>in</strong>ary part<br />
of (6.1) for λ = s + iε.<br />
We obta<strong>in</strong> (6.1) from the Riesz-Herglotz theorem by a change of<br />
variable. The mapp<strong>in</strong>g z = 1+iλ maps the upper half plane bijectively<br />
1−iλ<br />
to the unit disk, so G(z) = −iF (λ) is def<strong>in</strong>ed for z <strong>in</strong> the unit disk<br />
and has positive real part. Apply<strong>in</strong>g Theorem 6.3 we obta<strong>in</strong>, after<br />
simplification,<br />
F (λ) = Re F (i) + 1<br />
2π<br />
π<br />
−π<br />
1 + λ tan(θ/2)<br />
tan(θ/2) − λ<br />
dσ(θ) .<br />
Sett<strong>in</strong>g t = tan(θ/2) maps the open <strong>in</strong>terval (−π, π) onto the real axis.<br />
For θ = ±π the <strong>in</strong>tegrand equals λ, so any mass of σ at ±π gives rise<br />
to a term βλ with β ≥ 0. After the change of variable we get<br />
<br />
F (λ) = α + βλ +<br />
∞<br />
−∞<br />
1 + tλ<br />
t − λ<br />
dτ(t) ,<br />
where we have set α = Re F (i) and τ(t) = σ(θ)/(2π). S<strong>in</strong>ce<br />
1 + tλ<br />
t − λ =<br />
<br />
1 t<br />
−<br />
t − λ 1 + t2 <br />
(1 + t 2 )<br />
we now obta<strong>in</strong> (6.1) by sett<strong>in</strong>g ρ(t) = t<br />
0 (1 + s2 ) dτ(s).<br />
It rema<strong>in</strong>s to show the uniqueness of α and β. However, sett<strong>in</strong>g<br />
λ = i, it is clear that α = Re F (i), and s<strong>in</strong>ce we already know that ρ<br />
is unique, so is β. <br />
Actually one can calculate β directly from F s<strong>in</strong>ce by dom<strong>in</strong>ated<br />
convergence Im F (iν)/ν → β as ν → ∞. It is usual to refer to β as the<br />
‘mass at <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ity’, an expression expla<strong>in</strong>ed by our proof. Note, however,<br />
that it is the mass of τ at <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ity and not that of ρ!