06.04.2013 Views

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 9<br />

Extension theory<br />

We will here complete the discussion on selfadjo<strong>in</strong>t extensions of<br />

a symmetric operator begun <strong>in</strong> Chapter 4. This material is orig<strong>in</strong>ally<br />

due to von Neumann although our proofs are different, and we will also<br />

discuss an extension of von Neumann’s theory needed <strong>in</strong> Chapter 13.<br />

1. Symmetric operators<br />

We shall f<strong>in</strong>d criteria for the existence of selfadjo<strong>in</strong>t extensions of a<br />

densely def<strong>in</strong>ed symmetric operator, which accord<strong>in</strong>g to the discussion<br />

just before Example 4.4 must be a restriction of the adjo<strong>in</strong>t operator.<br />

We shall deal extensively with the graphs of various operators and it<br />

will be convenient to use the same notation for the graph of an operator<br />

T as for T itself. Note that if T is a closed operator on the <strong>Hilbert</strong><br />

space H, then its graph is a closed subspace of H ⊕ H, so <strong>in</strong> this case<br />

T is itself a <strong>Hilbert</strong> space.<br />

Recall that with the present notation we have<br />

T ∗ = U(H ⊕ H) ⊖ T ) = (H ⊕ H) ⊖ UT<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to (4.1), where U : H ⊕ H ∋ (u, v) ↦→ (−iv, iu) is the boundary<br />

operator <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> Chapter 4. Also recall that U is selfadjo<strong>in</strong>t,<br />

unitary and <strong>in</strong>volutary on H ⊕ H.<br />

So, assume we have a densely def<strong>in</strong>ed symmetric operator T . We<br />

want to <strong>in</strong>vestigate what selfadjo<strong>in</strong>t extensions, if any, T has. S<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

T ⊂ T ∗ the adjo<strong>in</strong>t is densely def<strong>in</strong>ed and thus the closure T = T ∗∗<br />

exists (Proposition 4.3) and is also symmetric. We may therefore as well<br />

assume that T is closed to beg<strong>in</strong> with. Recall that if S is a symmetric<br />

extension of T , then it is a restriction of T ∗ s<strong>in</strong>ce we then have T ⊂<br />

S ⊂ S ∗ ⊂ T ∗ . Now put<br />

D±i = {U ∈ T ∗ | UU = ±U}.<br />

Note that U ∈ T ∗ means exactly that U = (u, T ∗ u) for some u ∈ D(T ∗ ).<br />

It is immediately seen that Di and D−i consist of the elements of T ∗<br />

of the form (u, iu) and (u, −iu) respectively, so that u satisfies the<br />

equation T ∗ u = iu respectively T ∗ u = −iu. We may therefore identify<br />

these spaces with the deficiency spaces D±i <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> Chapter 5.<br />

Also D±i are therefore called deficiency spaces.<br />

Theorem 9.1 (von Neumann). If T is closed and symmetric operator,<br />

then T ∗ = T ⊕ Di ⊕ D−i.<br />

51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!