06.04.2013 Views

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 11<br />

Sturm-Liouville equations<br />

The spectral theorem we proved <strong>in</strong> Chapter 7 is very powerful, but<br />

sometimes its abstract nature is a drawback, and one needs a more explicit<br />

expansion, analogous to Fourier series or Fourier transforms. A<br />

general theorem of this type was proved by von Neumann <strong>in</strong> 1949, but<br />

it is still of a fairly abstract nature. It can be applied to elliptic partial<br />

differential equations (G˚ard<strong>in</strong>g around 1952), but gives more satisfactory<br />

results when applied to ord<strong>in</strong>ary differential equations. How to<br />

do this was described by G˚ard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> an appendix to John, Bers and<br />

Schechter: Partial Differential Equations, (1964). A slightly more general<br />

situation was treated <strong>in</strong> [2]. For Sturm-Liouville equations one<br />

can, however, as easily obta<strong>in</strong> an expansion theorem directly. We will<br />

do that <strong>in</strong> this chapter.<br />

As <strong>in</strong> our proof of the spectral theorem, we will deduce our results<br />

from properties of the resolvent, but now need to have a more explicit<br />

description of the resolvent operator. The first step is to prove that the<br />

resolvent is actually an <strong>in</strong>tegral operator. First note that all elements<br />

of D1 are cont<strong>in</strong>uously differentiable with locally absolutely cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />

derivative, and accord<strong>in</strong>g to Lemma 10.8 po<strong>in</strong>t evaluations of elements<br />

of D1 (and their derivatives) are locally uniformly bounded l<strong>in</strong>ear forms<br />

on D1.<br />

If T is a selfadjo<strong>in</strong>t realization of (10.3) <strong>in</strong> L 2 (I) its resolvent Rλ is a<br />

bounded operator on L 2 (I) for every λ <strong>in</strong> the resolvent set. If E denotes<br />

the identity on L 2 (I) we have (T − λ)Rλ = E so that T Rλ = E + λRλ.<br />

Thus T Rλ ≤ 1 + |λ|Rλ. S<strong>in</strong>ce Rλu is <strong>in</strong> the doma<strong>in</strong> of T we<br />

may also view the resolvent as an operator Rλ : L 2 (I) → D1, where<br />

D1 is viewed as a <strong>Hilbert</strong> space provided with the graph norm, as<br />

on page 65. This operator is bounded s<strong>in</strong>ce Rλu 2 1 = Rλu 2 +<br />

T Rλu 2 ≤ (Rλ 2 + (|λ|Rλ + 1) 2 )u 2 . It is also clear that the<br />

analyticity of Rλ implies the analyticity of T Rλ = E + λRλ, and therefore<br />

the analyticity of Rλ : L 2 (I) → D1. We obta<strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

theorem.<br />

Theorem 11.1. Suppose I is an <strong>in</strong>terval, and that T is a selfadjo<strong>in</strong>t<br />

realization <strong>in</strong> L 2 (I) of the equation (10.3). Then the resolvent Rλ of T<br />

may be viewed as a bounded l<strong>in</strong>ear map from L 2 (I) to C 1 (K), for any<br />

compact sub<strong>in</strong>terval K of I, which depends analytically on λ ∈ ρ(T ),<br />

<strong>in</strong> the uniform operator topology. Furthermore, there exists Green’s<br />

69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!