06.04.2013 Views

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

54 9. EXTENSION THEORY<br />

We call a (closed) l<strong>in</strong>ear subspace T of H 2 = H⊕H a (closed) l<strong>in</strong>ear<br />

relation on H. This is a generalization of the concept of (the graph<br />

of) a l<strong>in</strong>ear operator which will turn out to be useful <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

chapters. We still denote by U the boundary operator on H 2 and def<strong>in</strong>e<br />

the adjo<strong>in</strong>t of the l<strong>in</strong>ear relation T on H by<br />

T ∗ = H 2 ⊖ UT = U(H 2 ⊖ T ) .<br />

Clearly T ∗ is a closed l<strong>in</strong>ear relation on H. Note that by not <strong>in</strong>sist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that T and T ∗ are graphs we can, for example, now deal with adjo<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

of non-densely def<strong>in</strong>ed operators. Naturally T is called symmetric if<br />

T ⊂ T ∗ and selfadjo<strong>in</strong>t if T = T ∗ .<br />

Proposition 9.8. Let T ⊂ S be l<strong>in</strong>ear relations on H. Then S ∗ ⊂<br />

T ∗ . The closure of T is T = T ∗∗ and (T ) ∗ = T ∗ .<br />

The reader should prove this proposition as an exercise. It is very<br />

easy to obta<strong>in</strong> a spectral theorem for selfadjo<strong>in</strong>t relations as a corollary<br />

to the spectral theorem of Chapter 7. Given a relation T we call the set<br />

D(T ) = {u ∈ H | (u, v) ∈ T for some v ∈ H} the doma<strong>in</strong> of T . Now let<br />

HT be the closure of D(T ) <strong>in</strong> H and put H∞ = {u ∈ H | (0, u) ∈ T ∗ }<br />

One may view H∞ as the ‘eigen-space’ of T ∗ correspond<strong>in</strong>g to the<br />

‘eigen-value’ ∞.<br />

Proposition 9.9. H = HT ⊕ H∞.<br />

Proof. We have 〈(u, v), U(0, w)〉 = i〈u, w〉 so that (0, w) ∈ T ∗<br />

precisely when w ∈ H ⊖ D(T ). The proposition follows. <br />

Now assume T is selfadjo<strong>in</strong>t and put T∞ = {0} × H∞ and ˜ T =<br />

T ∩ H 2 T . Then it is clear that T = ˜ T ⊕ T∞ so we have split T <strong>in</strong>to<br />

its many-valued part T∞ and ˜ T which is called the operator part of T<br />

because of the follow<strong>in</strong>g theorem.<br />

Theorem 9.10 (<strong>Spectral</strong> theorem for selfadjo<strong>in</strong>t relations). If T is<br />

selfadjo<strong>in</strong>t, then ˜ T is the graph of a densely def<strong>in</strong>ed selfadjo<strong>in</strong>t operator<br />

<strong>in</strong> HT with doma<strong>in</strong> D(T ).<br />

Proof. ˜ T is the graph of a densely def<strong>in</strong>ed operator on HT s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

(0, w) ∈ ˜ T implies w ∈ H∞ ∩ HT = {0}. ˜ T is selfadjo<strong>in</strong>t s<strong>in</strong>ce ˜ T =<br />

T ⊖ T∞ so its adjo<strong>in</strong>t (<strong>in</strong> HT ) is ˜ T ∗ = H 2 T ∩ (T ∗ ⊕ UT∞) = H 2 T ∩ T = ˜ T<br />

(check this calculation carefully!). <br />

It is now clear that we get a resolution of the identity for T by<br />

adjo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the orthogonal projector onto H∞ to the resolution of the<br />

identity for ˜ T .<br />

Assume we have a symmetric relation T . We want to <strong>in</strong>vestigate<br />

what selfadjo<strong>in</strong>t extensions, if any, T has. S<strong>in</strong>ce the closure T of T is<br />

also symmetric we may as well assume that T is closed to beg<strong>in</strong> with.<br />

Just as is the case for operators, if S is a symmetric extension of T ,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!