09.04.2013 Views

Indian population in the United States and Alaska. 1910 - RootsWeb

Indian population in the United States and Alaska. 1910 - RootsWeb

Indian population in the United States and Alaska. 1910 - RootsWeb

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

88 INDIANS IN THE UNITED STATES.<br />

MiwoTc.—The ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> largest subdivision of this<br />

stock. They have no dist<strong>in</strong>ctive popular name, be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

usually known only by <strong>the</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>gless term of" Digger<br />

<strong>Indian</strong>s." Their habitat, s<strong>in</strong>ce known to Europeans<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> eighteenth century, has been <strong>in</strong> central California,<br />

<strong>and</strong> may be roughly described as extend<strong>in</strong>g north<br />

<strong>and</strong> south from <strong>the</strong> Cosumnes River to Fresno Creek,<br />

<strong>and</strong> east <strong>and</strong> west from <strong>the</strong> crest of <strong>the</strong> Sierras to <strong>the</strong><br />

San Joaqu<strong>in</strong> River. The Miwok, as enumerated <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>1910</strong>, numbered 670, of which" 669 were <strong>in</strong> CaUfornia<br />

<strong>and</strong> 1 <strong>in</strong> Nevada.<br />

MUSKHOGEAN STOCK.<br />

Stock as a whole.—One of <strong>the</strong> five largest stocks <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>. At <strong>the</strong> time first known to Euro-peans,<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sixteenth century, it occupied a compact<br />

s<strong>in</strong>gle area compris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> largest part of Mississippi,<br />

Alabama, <strong>and</strong> western <strong>and</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn Georgia, toge<strong>the</strong>r<br />

with <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn half of Florida.<br />

The <strong>Indian</strong>s of <strong>the</strong> Muskhogean stock, as enumerated<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>1910</strong>, numbered 29,191. To this figure should be<br />

added perhaps 1,500 for <strong>Indian</strong>s of this stock reported<br />

without dist<strong>in</strong>ction of tribe among <strong>the</strong> general <strong>population</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong> Alabama, Mississippi, Georgia, Florida, <strong>and</strong><br />

Oklahoma, mak<strong>in</strong>g a probable total of between 30,000<br />

<strong>and</strong> 31,000. The tribes of this stock, for which mem-<br />

bers were reported, are as follows:<br />

Alibamu. Choctaw. Koasati.<br />

CMckasaw. Creek. Sem<strong>in</strong>ole.<br />

AWbamu.—^A tribe closely related to <strong>the</strong> Koasati <strong>and</strong><br />

formerly belong<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> Creek Confederacy. Their<br />

earliest known habitat was on <strong>the</strong> lower Alabama<br />

River <strong>in</strong> Alabama. At <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> eighteenth century<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> early portion of <strong>the</strong> n<strong>in</strong>eteenth century<br />

part of <strong>the</strong> tribe removed to Louisiana, part to Polk<br />

County, Tex., <strong>and</strong> part followed <strong>the</strong> Creeks to <strong>Indian</strong><br />

Territory. The renmants are now found <strong>in</strong> all three<br />

of <strong>the</strong>se localities, only those <strong>in</strong> Oklahoma be<strong>in</strong>g located<br />

on any reservation. These latter were not enumerated<br />

as Alibamu by <strong>the</strong> census. The number reported <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>1910</strong> was 298, of which 187 were <strong>in</strong> Texas <strong>and</strong> 111 <strong>in</strong><br />

Louisiana.<br />

CMckasaw.—One of <strong>the</strong> larger tribes of this stock<br />

whose early habitat was <strong>in</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn Mississippi. By<br />

<strong>the</strong> b^<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> n<strong>in</strong>eteenth century <strong>the</strong>y began to<br />

move westward to what is now Oklahoma, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> 1855<br />

were given a separate reservation <strong>the</strong>re.<br />

The number enumerated <strong>in</strong> <strong>1910</strong> was 4,2p4, of which<br />

4,191 were <strong>in</strong> Oklahoma. Comparison with earher<br />

years is made difficult by <strong>the</strong> fact that' until 1898 <strong>the</strong><br />

Chickasaw were not returned <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> reports of <strong>the</strong><br />

Commissioner of <strong>Indian</strong> Affairs separate from freedmen<br />

(Negroes) <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>termarried whites.* S<strong>in</strong>ce 1898<br />

<strong>the</strong> figures for this tribe <strong>in</strong> Oklahoma are as follows<br />

TEAK.<br />

:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!