09.04.2013 Views

Indian population in the United States and Alaska. 1910 - RootsWeb

Indian population in the United States and Alaska. 1910 - RootsWeb

Indian population in the United States and Alaska. 1910 - RootsWeb

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

112 INDIANS IN THE UNITED STATES.<br />

EnaialchotaTM.—A tribe occupy<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> whole of <strong>the</strong><br />

Kenai Pen<strong>in</strong>sula <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> region around Cook Inlet<br />

from <strong>the</strong> head of <strong>the</strong> Knik <strong>and</strong> Shushitna Rivers southwest<br />

as far as Ihamna Lake. The number enumerated<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>1910</strong> was 697. In <strong>the</strong> early part of <strong>the</strong> n<strong>in</strong>eteenth<br />

centmy this tribe was estimated at 1,300 to 1,500.<br />

In 1880 <strong>the</strong> census showed 614 <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> 1890, 839. For<br />

<strong>the</strong> latter year <strong>the</strong> Bureau of Ethnology reported 724.<br />

Kutch<strong>in</strong>.—^A group of tribes occupy<strong>in</strong>g a large part<br />

of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terior of <strong>Alaska</strong> <strong>and</strong> extend<strong>in</strong>g far <strong>in</strong>to north-<br />

western Canada to <strong>the</strong> Mackenzie River. Their sub-<br />

divisions <strong>in</strong> <strong>Alaska</strong> comprise <strong>the</strong> Hankutch<strong>in</strong>, Natsitkutch<strong>in</strong>,<br />

Tenankutch<strong>in</strong>, Tukkuthkutch<strong>in</strong>, <strong>and</strong> Vun-<br />

takutch<strong>in</strong>.<br />

Under <strong>the</strong> head<strong>in</strong>g of Kutch<strong>in</strong> a considerable number<br />

of persons were enumerated without fur<strong>the</strong>r dis-<br />

t<strong>in</strong>ction of tribe, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>se are here grouped toge<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

The number enumerated as Kutch<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>1910</strong> was 359.<br />

Similar figures for earHer censuses were 580 <strong>in</strong> 1890<br />

<strong>and</strong> 107 <strong>in</strong> 1880.<br />

Ndhane.—^A group composed of several distiact<br />

tribes liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn British Columbia <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Yukon Territory, Canada. Only 8 were enumerated<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>1910</strong>.<br />

NatsiikutcMn.—^A tribe belong<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> Kutch<strong>in</strong><br />

subdivision of this stock, <strong>and</strong> liv<strong>in</strong>g north of <strong>the</strong> Porcup<strong>in</strong>e<br />

River, <strong>in</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn <strong>Alaska</strong>. The number<br />

enumerated <strong>in</strong> <strong>1910</strong> was 177. Comparison with <strong>the</strong><br />

census figures of earlier years is of somewhat doubtful<br />

value, ow<strong>in</strong>g to uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty as to what was <strong>in</strong>cluded<br />

under <strong>the</strong> term. As nearly as can be determiued<br />

<strong>the</strong>y numbered 312 <strong>in</strong> 1880.<br />

TenankutcJi<strong>in</strong>.—^A tribe whose habitat comprised<br />

<strong>the</strong> whole of <strong>the</strong> bas<strong>in</strong> of <strong>the</strong> Tanana River. The<br />

number enumerated <strong>in</strong> <strong>1910</strong> was 415. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

<strong>the</strong> census of 1890, <strong>the</strong>y numbered 309, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> 1880,<br />

738. In 1890 <strong>the</strong> Bureau of Ethnology reported 373.<br />

TuTckutkTcutch<strong>in</strong>.—^A Canadian tribe of this stock<br />

whose habitat lies between <strong>the</strong> upper Porcup<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong><br />

Mackenzie Rivers, Yukon Territory. Only 6 were<br />

enumerated <strong>in</strong> <strong>1910</strong>.<br />

UndkJwfana.—^A tribe liv<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> Yukon River<br />

between <strong>the</strong> mouths of <strong>the</strong> Tanana <strong>and</strong> Koyukuk<br />

Rivers, <strong>and</strong> also on <strong>the</strong> latter stream. The number<br />

enumerated <strong>in</strong> <strong>1910</strong> was 193. Census figures for 1890<br />

<strong>and</strong> 1880 were 502 <strong>and</strong> 596, respectively.<br />

VuntakutcMn.—^A tribe belongiag to <strong>the</strong> Kutch<strong>in</strong><br />

subdivision of this stock, <strong>and</strong> occupy<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> region<br />

north from <strong>the</strong> Porcup<strong>in</strong>e River toward <strong>the</strong> Arctic<br />

coast. Only 5 persons were enumerated <strong>in</strong> <strong>1910</strong> as<br />

members of this tribe, 2 males <strong>and</strong> 3 females.<br />

Tribe not reported.— ^Under this head<strong>in</strong>g are <strong>in</strong>cluded<br />

all those <strong>Indian</strong>s who were enumerated merely as<br />

"Athapaskan" without fur<strong>the</strong>r detail as to tribe, toge<strong>the</strong>r<br />

with a small number of o<strong>the</strong>rs, for whom no<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation whatever was given except "<strong>Indian</strong>," but<br />

who from o<strong>the</strong>r evidence, almost certa<strong>in</strong>ly belonged<br />

to this stock.<br />

The Athapaskans <strong>in</strong> <strong>Alaska</strong> of imcerta<strong>in</strong> or unknown<br />

tribal affiliation numbered 1,472 <strong>in</strong> <strong>1910</strong>. On accoimt<br />

of <strong>the</strong> large number thus returned, <strong>the</strong>y are shown<br />

by sex <strong>and</strong> age <strong>in</strong> Table 52 (p. 154).<br />

ESKIMAUAN STOCK.<br />

Stock as a whole.—This stock is more widely distributed<br />

than any o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> North America, its members<br />

extend<strong>in</strong>g from near Mount St. Elias, <strong>in</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

<strong>Alaska</strong>, a,long <strong>the</strong> entire nor<strong>the</strong>rn littoral of <strong>the</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>ent<br />

to <strong>the</strong> east coast of Greenl<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> formerly south<br />

as far as <strong>the</strong> Gulf of St. Lawrence. A small group is<br />

also foTuid <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> vic<strong>in</strong>ity of East Cape, Siberia. They<br />

nowhere extend far <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terior. The total <strong>population</strong><br />

of <strong>the</strong> Eskimauan stock <strong>in</strong> <strong>Alaska</strong>, as enumer-<br />

ated <strong>in</strong> <strong>1910</strong>, is 14,087. The number reported by <strong>the</strong><br />

census for this stock <strong>in</strong> 1890 was 15,550, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> 1880,<br />

20,245.<br />

Real tribal groups <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> more exact sense of <strong>the</strong><br />

term are not found among <strong>the</strong> Eskimo, <strong>the</strong> subdivi-<br />

sions be<strong>in</strong>g generally more geographical than tribal,<br />

<strong>the</strong> names given relat<strong>in</strong>g often to a s<strong>in</strong>gle village only.<br />

The tribes or groups of <strong>the</strong> Eskimauan stock, for which<br />

members were reported, are as follows:<br />

Aleut.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!