Indian population in the United States and Alaska. 1910 - RootsWeb

More documents

Recommendations

Info

78 INDIANS IN THE UNITED STATES. The total reported in 1910 was 694, all in New Mexico. Figures for this tribe are given with considerable regularity in the reports of the Commissioner of Indian Affairs as far back as 1869. TEAK.
STOCKS AND TRIBES, BY SEX, AGE, AND BLOOD. 79 enumeration of the census is too small seems probable. An exact enumeration, however, is, as already stated, practically impossible. Redwood (syn. Whilkut).—Â small group or tribe closely related to the Hupa. Their habitat was on Upper Redwood Creek, directly west of the Hupa in Humboldt County, Cal. Located for several years previous to 1870 at Hupa Reservation, most have since removed to their original homes. The local name for these Indians is Redwood, a term also applied to theHuchnom, a branch of the Yukian stock in Mendocino County. The total number reported in 1910 was 76, of which 74 were in California and 2 in Washington. Rogue River (syn. Tututni).—Â group of small tribes who in the early nineteenth century were living on the lower Rogue River and adjacent area in Curry County, Oreg. In 1856 they were removed to Siletz Reservation and some time later were transferred to the Grande Ronde Reservation. The remnants are at present divided between these two reservations. There is much confusion in the use of the term Tututni aiitl Rogue River, and among those returned as such, and here tabulated, there are probably some Chetco, Chastacosta and other Athapaskan tribes of this region. The number enumerated in 1910 was 383, of which 368 were in Oregon. Strictly comparable figures for this tribe can not be obtained, but an approximation can be made as follows: In 1854, at the time of their transportation as prisoners of war to Siletz, the Rogue River were given as numbering 1,311. In 1867 they seem still to have numbered over 1,300, but 10 years later, in 1877, were reduced to less than 700 and in 1881 to less than 500. Since that date no separate report has been made. Saiaz.—Â term of somewhat uncertain application, applied to a portion of the Kuneste section of the Pacific coast division of this stock. Their habitat since earliest traditional times was in Humboldt and Trinity Counties, Cal. They are practically one with the. Wailaki. Between 1862 and 1878 they were gathered first at the Smith River Reservation and also at the Hupa Reservation, but since the latter date the few survivors have been scattered over their original territory. The number enumerated in 1910 was 6, all in California. TenanTcutchin.—One white half-breed male of this Alaskan tribe (see p. 112) was reported from Oregon in 1910. TlatskanaL—K small tribe formerly living on the Chehalis River, Wash., and later in Columbia County, Oreg. They were supposed to be extinct several years ago. Three were reported from Washington in 1910. ToTxma (syn. Crescent City, Smith River Indians.)— A small tribe or group belonging to the Kuneste section of the Pacific coast division of this stock. Their habitat since earhest traditional times has been in the extreme northwestern corner of California, comprising practically all of Del Norte County. Between 1862 and 1868 they were gathered on a small reservation on Smith River which was later abandoned, and since the latter date the Tolowa have not been located on a reservation. The number enumerated in 1910 was 121, of which 118 were in California and 3 in Oregon. Vm'pqua.—Â tribal name of somewhat vague application, generally applied, however, to the Indians of the upper Umpqua River, in Douglas County, Oreg. They were removed to the Alsea Reservation in the middle of the nineteenth century, and later divided between Siletz and Grande Ronde Reservation, Oreg., * where they still remain. The number enumerated in 1910 was 109, of which 90 were in Oregon and 17 in Washington. Compara- tive figures from the reports of the Commissioner of Indian AflFairs are available since 1860, as follows: TEAR.
Page 2 and 3:
E PROM THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Page 5:
^^ Cornell University Library The o
Page 10 and 11:
ASOQqt^
Page 12 and 13:
Sex Distribution—Continued. CONTE
Page 14 and 15:
4 CONTENTS. Page. Illtteract 212-23
Page 17:
Sik: LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. DEPARTM
Page 21 and 22:
This report gives the principal sta
Page 23 and 24:
Mexico, which in 1890 and 1900 was
Page 25 and 26:
10,000 of the total population decr
Page 27 and 28:
POPULATION. 15 NUMBER OP INDIANS RE
Page 29 and 30:
Table 9 TEIBE AKD STATE. ABNAia (Al
Page 31 and 32:
Table 9—Continued. TRIBE AND STAT
Page 33 and 34:
Table 9—Continued. TRIBE AND STAT
Page 35 and 36:
POPULATION. 23 INDIAN POPULATION OF
Page 37 and 38:
Table 11 coiniTT. Alabaua. Autauga
Page 39 and 40: POPULATION. INDIAN POPULATION OP TH
Page 41 and 42: Table 1 1—C!ontinued. POPULATION.
Page 43 and 44: FiiH-ilood and mixed-blood Indians.
Page 45 and 46: PROPORTION OF MIXED-BLOODS. 33 DIST
Page 47 and 48: In the United States, as shown by T
Page 49 and 50: PROPORTION OF MIXED-BLOODS. 37 DIST
Page 51 and 52: states, as reported in 1910. Table
Page 53 and 54: PROPORTION OF MIXED -BLOODS. 41 DIS
Page 55 and 56: In considering the classification o
Page 57 and 58: SEX DISTRIBUTION. 45 INDIANS IN THE
Page 59 and 60: Table 30 SEX DISTRIBUTION. 47 MALES
Page 61 and 62: SEX DISTRIBUTION. 49 MALES TO 100 F
Page 63 and 64: SEX DISTRIBUTION. 51 MALES TO 100 F
Page 65 and 66: The Indian popula&n of the United S
Page 67 and 68: Table 37 AGE DISTRIBUTION. 55 AGE D
Page 69 and 70: AGE DISTRIBUTION. 57 DISTRIBUTION B
Page 71 and 72: AGE DISTRIBUTION. 59 INDIANS IN THE
Page 73 and 74: AGE DISTRIBUTION. 61 AGE DISTKIBUTI
Page 75 and 76: AGE DISTRIBUTION. 63 AGE DISTRIBTTT
Page 77 and 78: Table 46 AGE DISTRIBUTION. 65 MALES
Page 79 and 80: een more frequently exposed to the
Page 81 and 82: AGE DISTRIBUTION. 69 MALES TO 100 F
Page 83 and 84: STOCKS AND TRIBES, BY SEX, AGE. AND
Page 85 and 86: STOCKS AND TRIBES, BY SEX, AGE, AND
Page 89: STOCKS AND TRIBES, BY SEX, AGE, AND
Page 141 and 142:
STOCKS AND TRIBES, BY SEX, AGE, AND
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Information was collected by the Ce
Page 171 and 172:
For all classes of marriages the pr
Page 173 and 174:
The statistics here given have refe
Page 175 and 176:
Table 63 AGE FEEIOD. United States.
Page 177 and 178:
MARITAL CONDITION. 165 MARITAL COND
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
MARITAL CONDITION. MARITAL CONDITIO
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
MARITAL CONDITION. 185 MAEITAL COND
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
One of the most interesting social
Page 209 and 210:
Table 74 shows, for the United Stat
Page 211 and 212:
ance was reported, namely, Lutuamia
Page 213 and 214:
SCHOOL ATTENDANCE. 201 SCHOOL ATTEN
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
difference between the sexes is par
Page 227 and 228:
ILLITERACY. 215 ILLITERATE INDIAN M
Page 229 and 230:
Athapaskan males and females and al
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
ILLITERACY. 227 ILLITEKATES AMONG I
Page 241 and 242:
ILLITERACY. ILLITERATES AMONG INDIA
Page 243 and 244:
ILLITERACY. 231 ILLITEBATES AMONG I
Page 245 and 246:
Of the 22 selected states, as skown
Page 247 and 248:
INABILITY TO SPEAK ENGLISH. 235 PER
Page 249 and 250:
INABILITY TO SPEAK ENGLISH. 237 IND
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
For the male Indian population 10 y
Page 265 and 266:
OCCUPATIONS. 253 NUMBER AND PROPORT
Page 267 and 268:
Number and proportion in the genera
Page 269 and 270:
OCCUPATIONS. 257 NUMBER OP INDIANS
Page 271 and 272:
Table 107 AQE PEBIOD. UNITED STATES
Page 273 and 274:
OCCUPATIONS. 261 NUMBER OF INDIAN M
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
OCCUPATIONS. 265 NUMBER OP INDIAN M
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
OCCUPATIONS. NUMBER OF INDIAN MALES
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
OCCUPATIONS. NUMBEB OP INDLA.N MALE
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
The apportionment of congressional
Page 297:
INDIANS TAXED AND NOT TAXED. 285 PR
show all

Indian population in the United States and Alaska. 1910 - RootsWeb

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?