09.04.2013 Views

Indian population in the United States and Alaska. 1910 - RootsWeb

Indian population in the United States and Alaska. 1910 - RootsWeb

Indian population in the United States and Alaska. 1910 - RootsWeb

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

114 INDIANS IN THE UNITED STATES.<br />

Naparktoo.—Under this name a few persons were<br />

enumerated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> vic<strong>in</strong>ity of Po<strong>in</strong>t Barrow. The<br />

name is probably that of a village, but it has not been<br />

possible to locate it. The people are almost certa<strong>in</strong>ly<br />

Eskimo. The Naparktoo, as enumerated <strong>in</strong> <strong>1910</strong>,<br />

numbered 9.<br />

Neechuktamiut.—A tribe or village located apparently<br />

on M<strong>in</strong>iatulik Kiver, flow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to Norton Bay.<br />

It is uncerta<strong>in</strong> whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>se Eskimo should be con-<br />

sidered as a subdivision of <strong>the</strong> Kaviagmiut or <strong>the</strong><br />

Malemiut. The number enumerated <strong>in</strong> <strong>1910</strong> was 25.<br />

Nunatogmiut.—A tribe occupy<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> region about<br />

<strong>the</strong> Noatak River, <strong>and</strong> extend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>l<strong>and</strong> a considerable<br />

distance. The appUcation of <strong>the</strong> name has been somewhat<br />

variable. The number enumerated <strong>in</strong> <strong>1910</strong> was<br />

285. Ow<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> application of<br />

<strong>the</strong> name, comparison with earlier censuses is of doubt-<br />

ful value, only 42 be<strong>in</strong>g reported <strong>in</strong> 1890 <strong>and</strong> 650 <strong>in</strong><br />

1880.<br />

Nunivagmiut.—^A tribe liv<strong>in</strong>g on Nunivak Isl<strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> a small area about Cape Vancouver <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Yukon-<br />

Kuskokwim delta region. The number enumerated <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>1910</strong> was 301, as aga<strong>in</strong>st 702 <strong>in</strong> 1890 <strong>and</strong> 408 <strong>in</strong> 1880.<br />

NuTiochogmiut.—A village or tribe <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Yukon<br />

delta, <strong>in</strong>l<strong>and</strong> from Baird Inlet. They form a subdivision<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Magemiut. The number enumerated<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>1910</strong> was 158, as compared with 135 <strong>in</strong> 1890 <strong>and</strong> 40<br />

<strong>in</strong> 1880.<br />

NushagagTniut.— ^A tribe liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> vic<strong>in</strong>ity of<br />

Nushagak Bay, of which <strong>the</strong> number enumerated <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>1910</strong> was 31. Ow<strong>in</strong>g to uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty as to what is<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded under <strong>the</strong> name, comparison with earlier<br />

censuses is of little value, 193 be<strong>in</strong>g reported <strong>in</strong> 1890<br />

<strong>and</strong> 817 <strong>in</strong> 1880.<br />

Nuvmlcmiut.—A tribe liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> vic<strong>in</strong>ity of Po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

Barrow, on <strong>the</strong> Arctic coast. The number enumerated<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>1910</strong> was 81, as aga<strong>in</strong>st 143 <strong>in</strong> 1890. They were not<br />

reported separately at <strong>the</strong> census of 1880.<br />

Pitulcmiut.—A small group of Eskimo enumerated<br />

on Kotzebue Sound, whose precise habitat <strong>and</strong> affiha^<br />

tions are unknown. Four full-blood Pitukmiut were<br />

enumerated <strong>in</strong> <strong>1910</strong>—3 males <strong>and</strong> 1 female.<br />

Polazramiut.—A small tribe, probably a subdivision<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Eanugumiut, enumerated near Cape Pr<strong>in</strong>ce of<br />

Wales, Seward Pen<strong>in</strong>sula. The number enumerated<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>1910</strong> was 14.<br />

Sdawigmiut.—^A tribe liv<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>and</strong> near Selawik<br />

Lake, near Kotzebue Sound, of which <strong>the</strong> number<br />

enumerated <strong>in</strong> <strong>1910</strong> was 258.<br />

Sidarumiut.—^A tribe or village located on <strong>the</strong><br />

Arctic coast <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> vic<strong>in</strong>ity of Po<strong>in</strong>t Belcher. Five<br />

Sidarumiut were enumerated <strong>in</strong> <strong>1910</strong>—2 fuU-blood<br />

males, 2 fuU-blood females, <strong>and</strong> 1 mixed white <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>Indian</strong> male.<br />

Tikeramiut.—A tribe liv<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> northwestern<br />

coast <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> vic<strong>in</strong>ity of Po<strong>in</strong>t Hope. The number<br />

enumerated <strong>in</strong> <strong>1910</strong> was 320, as compared with 295 <strong>in</strong><br />

1890. In 1880 <strong>the</strong>y were not enumerated separately.<br />

Togiagmiut.—A tribe liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> vic<strong>in</strong>ity of<br />

Togiak Lake <strong>and</strong> Bay (Bristol Bay). The number<br />

emunerated <strong>in</strong> <strong>1910</strong> was 93, as aga<strong>in</strong>st 190 <strong>in</strong> 1890.<br />

They were not enumerated separately <strong>in</strong> 1880.<br />

Wdvokmiwt.—^A subdivision of <strong>the</strong> Kaviagmiut, liv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

on K<strong>in</strong>g Isl<strong>and</strong>, Ber<strong>in</strong>g Strait. The number<br />

enumerated <strong>in</strong> <strong>1910</strong> was 140, as compared with 200<br />

at <strong>the</strong> census of 1890.<br />

TJnaligmiut.—A tribe occupy<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> shores of<br />

Norton Sound from a little south of Cape Denbigh<br />

nearly to <strong>the</strong> mouth of <strong>the</strong> Yukon. The number<br />

enumerated <strong>in</strong> <strong>1910</strong> was 441. Earher census figures<br />

were 119 <strong>in</strong> 1890 <strong>and</strong> 418 <strong>in</strong> 1880.<br />

Uikiav<strong>in</strong>miut.—A tribe liv<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> Arctic coast at<br />

<strong>and</strong> to <strong>the</strong> west of Cape Smith. The number enumerated<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>1910</strong> was 123, as aga<strong>in</strong>st 193 reported <strong>in</strong><br />

1890.<br />

TJtukamiut (syn. Otookogmiut).—A tribe liv<strong>in</strong>g on<br />

<strong>the</strong> Arctic coast between Po<strong>in</strong>t Hope <strong>and</strong> Wa<strong>in</strong>right<br />

Inlet. The number enumerated <strong>in</strong> <strong>1910</strong> was 127.<br />

Comparison with earlier years is limited to 1890, at<br />

which census 48 were reported. The large <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

thus shown is probably due partly to uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty as<br />

to tribal limits, <strong>and</strong> partly to <strong>the</strong> fact that, be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

more nomadic than many of <strong>the</strong> tribes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> vic<strong>in</strong>ity,<br />

a considerable number were not enumerated <strong>in</strong> 1890.<br />

Yuit.—A group of Eskimo occupy<strong>in</strong>g St. Lawrence<br />

Isl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> region about East Cape, Siberia. The<br />

number enumerated <strong>in</strong> <strong>1910</strong> was 292, as compared<br />

with 267 <strong>in</strong> 1890 <strong>and</strong> 500 (as estimated) <strong>in</strong> 1880.<br />

Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Eskimo.—By an unfortunate error on <strong>the</strong><br />

part of <strong>the</strong> enumerators, <strong>the</strong> naajority of <strong>the</strong> Eskimo<br />

of sou<strong>the</strong>rn <strong>Alaska</strong>, from <strong>the</strong> Shtunag<strong>in</strong> Isl<strong>and</strong>s to<br />

Controller Bay, toge<strong>the</strong>r with some on <strong>the</strong> shores of<br />

Bristol Bay, were enumerated wrongly as Aleut. The<br />

tribal groups so confused were ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>the</strong> Kaniagmiut,<br />

Chugachigmiut, <strong>and</strong> Ugalakmiut, <strong>and</strong> to a lesser degree<br />

<strong>the</strong> Agiemiut <strong>and</strong> perhaps a few of <strong>the</strong> Nushagagmiut.<br />

A portion of <strong>the</strong> Agiemiut <strong>and</strong> Kaniagmiut were,<br />

however, correctly enumerated under <strong>the</strong>ir proper<br />

names. As it has been impossible to separate this<br />

mixed body of Eskimo <strong>in</strong>to its constituent tribal or<br />

geographic divisions, <strong>the</strong>y have been treated as a<br />

general group under <strong>the</strong> above head<strong>in</strong>g, which thus<br />

<strong>in</strong>cludes all Eskimo south <strong>and</strong> east of <strong>the</strong> head of<br />

Bristol Bay. The number enumerated <strong>in</strong> <strong>1910</strong> was<br />

3,650. No very satisfactory comparison with <strong>the</strong><br />

census figures for earlier years can be made. The<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>population</strong> of <strong>the</strong> Agiemiut, Chugachigmiut,<br />

Kaniagmiut, <strong>and</strong> Ugalakmiut was 3,142 <strong>in</strong> 1890 <strong>and</strong><br />

3,489 <strong>in</strong> 1880.<br />

Tribe not reported.— ^Under this general head<strong>in</strong>g are<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded all persons enumerated merely as " Eskimo "<br />

without fur<strong>the</strong>r dist<strong>in</strong>ction of tribe. The Eskimo<br />

of unknown affiliation enumerated <strong>in</strong> <strong>Alaska</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>1910</strong><br />

were 474, <strong>and</strong> on account of this comparatively large<br />

number, <strong>the</strong>y are shown separately by sex <strong>and</strong> age <strong>in</strong><br />

Table 52 (p. 156).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!