Untitled - Smithsonian Institution
Untitled - Smithsonian Institution
Untitled - Smithsonian Institution
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
THOMAS] INDIAN LANGUAGES OF MEXICO AND CENTRAL AMERICA 21<br />
Topia as another language or dialect of the group, which idea Vater<br />
has carried into his Mithridates (iii, pt. 3, 138-139), though admitting<br />
relationship with Acaxee. Balbi makes it distinct from the latter;<br />
but Orozco y Berra (1:319) differs wholly from this opinion, considering<br />
the two as the same language. He quotes (1:314) manuscript<br />
authority showing Topia to be merely the name of a province<br />
or district.<br />
Ahumada (96), writing in 1608, makes the Hume a "nacion"<br />
distinct from the Jijime, though speaking the same language. Ribas<br />
(562) says these Indians inhabit the highest part of the sierra as<br />
one goes eastward. Alegre (ii, 199) also calls the Hume a "nacion"<br />
and says the name was given to them from the configuration of the<br />
natural defenses of their country. Hervas (327) expresses the opinion<br />
that the Hume (Huime, as he writes it) were related to the Jijime.<br />
Orozco y Berra also holds that both the Hume and Hina were related<br />
to, or rather were offshoots of, the Jijime.<br />
Alegre, speaking of the Hina (ii, 195), says they inhabited the most<br />
profound breaks C' profundisimas quebradas") of the center of the<br />
sierra and the margin of the Rio Piaztla, and spoke a diverse lan-<br />
guage. Notwithstanding this evidence, Orozco y Berra, who perhaps<br />
had additional data, although recognizing the Hume and the<br />
Hina as separate or distinct peoples, and giving them in his list of<br />
tribes, omits them from his list of languages, thereby expressing his<br />
belief that they did not speak distinct idioms. It is considered<br />
safest to follow his example.<br />
In this connection it maybe as well to refer to the Huite. Ribas<br />
(207) says their language was different from that of the Cinaloa (Ya-<br />
qui group). Orozco y Berra (1: 333) says they were a warlike tribe,<br />
at open strife with all their neighbors, and were anthropophagi.<br />
Their location was in the sierra, about "seven leagues from the Sina-<br />
loas." He adds that the name, which signifies " arrow " in Cahita, indi-<br />
cates relationship of idiom to this language. Although he gives the<br />
name in his list of languages, he omits it from the classification, map,<br />
and extinct idioms. It has been omitted from the classified list in<br />
this paper, and from the map, but with some doubt.<br />
Cora<br />
(Synonyms: Chora, Chota, Nayarita)<br />
The people speaking this language hve in the Sierra de Nayarit<br />
and on the Rio de Jesus Maria, in the state of Jalisco. They are the<br />
most southerly tribe of what may be termed the Sonoran group of<br />
the Nahuatlan family.<br />
Orozco y Berra, whose mapping is followed substantially in reference<br />
to the Cora territory, has marked this area according to the best