Untitled - Smithsonian Institution
Untitled - Smithsonian Institution
Untitled - Smithsonian Institution
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
74 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [bull. 44<br />
mistake of Stoll (2:27) in calling the Pupuluca (b) a Mixe dialect<br />
is pointed out by Brinton (3:152). The latter author appears to<br />
have made precisely the same mistake, however, in his paper on<br />
the Xinca Indians, read before the American Philosophical Society,<br />
October 17, 1884. On his map viii Sapper places a Lencan colony<br />
possibly intended to correspond with Pupuluca (b)—slightly farther<br />
to the northeast than the locality given by Stoll, who follows<br />
Juarros. The last-named authority (l:i, 98) mentions Conguaco<br />
as the pueblo of the people speaking this dialect, which is in the area<br />
marked by him. The other dialects w^ere Guajiquero, Intibucat,<br />
Opatoro, and Similiton, spoken in central Honduras in and about<br />
the pueblos of the same names, respectively. Sapper (1 : 28)<br />
mentions also as dialects Chilanga and Guatijigua, spoken in and<br />
about villages so named, in northeastern Salvador. He fails,<br />
however, to furnish vocabularies by which to determine relation-<br />
ship, having obtained, it seems, only twenty words of the former<br />
dialect. Nevertheless, as the pueblos are in the region where Lenca<br />
prevailed, there can be but little doubt that they are local variations<br />
of that language. No attempt has been made to mark the areas<br />
of these dialects on the accompanying map. It is possible the<br />
Chondal of Squier, mentioned below, should be considered a dialect,<br />
for it appears from a statement by Brinton that Desire Pector termed<br />
them ''Chontal-Lencas."<br />
From the data obtainable it is impossible to define accurately the<br />
boundaries of the chief Lencan area. The writer has been guided<br />
in this respect chiefly by Squier (4:378 et seq.), omitting, of course,<br />
his conclusion that the Jicaque and Paya belong to the same stock<br />
as the Lenca. He was inclined to include geographically not only<br />
the department of San Miguel in Salvador and those of Santa<br />
Barbara and Comayagua in Honduras, but also Choluteca and parts<br />
of Tegucigalpa, Olancho, and Yoro in the latter state (as they were<br />
then defined); also the islands of Roatan and Guanaja. After<br />
eliminatmg the territories of the Jicaque and Paya the writer has<br />
outlined the Lencan territory to correspond as nearly as possible<br />
with the most recent data. As mapped it appears to conform, at<br />
least in a general way, with Sapper's determination, except that it<br />
adds a small extension into Nicaragua to include Squier's Chondal,<br />
w^ho, according to Brinton (3:149), are Lenca. It includes that<br />
part of San Salvador east of the Lempa river, the modern departments<br />
of Paraiso, Tegucigalpa, La Paz, Intibuca, Comayagua, and<br />
parts of Santa Barbara and Gracias in Honduras, and extends into the<br />
southern part of Segovia in Nicaragua.<br />
Tlascalteca<br />
This is a dialect of the Nahuatlan family, closely allied to the<br />
Tlascalan, which from a statement of Scherzer (456) appears to<br />
—