24.04.2013 Views

Untitled - Smithsonian Institution

Untitled - Smithsonian Institution

Untitled - Smithsonian Institution

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

74 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [bull. 44<br />

mistake of Stoll (2:27) in calling the Pupuluca (b) a Mixe dialect<br />

is pointed out by Brinton (3:152). The latter author appears to<br />

have made precisely the same mistake, however, in his paper on<br />

the Xinca Indians, read before the American Philosophical Society,<br />

October 17, 1884. On his map viii Sapper places a Lencan colony<br />

possibly intended to correspond with Pupuluca (b)—slightly farther<br />

to the northeast than the locality given by Stoll, who follows<br />

Juarros. The last-named authority (l:i, 98) mentions Conguaco<br />

as the pueblo of the people speaking this dialect, which is in the area<br />

marked by him. The other dialects w^ere Guajiquero, Intibucat,<br />

Opatoro, and Similiton, spoken in central Honduras in and about<br />

the pueblos of the same names, respectively. Sapper (1 : 28)<br />

mentions also as dialects Chilanga and Guatijigua, spoken in and<br />

about villages so named, in northeastern Salvador. He fails,<br />

however, to furnish vocabularies by which to determine relation-<br />

ship, having obtained, it seems, only twenty words of the former<br />

dialect. Nevertheless, as the pueblos are in the region where Lenca<br />

prevailed, there can be but little doubt that they are local variations<br />

of that language. No attempt has been made to mark the areas<br />

of these dialects on the accompanying map. It is possible the<br />

Chondal of Squier, mentioned below, should be considered a dialect,<br />

for it appears from a statement by Brinton that Desire Pector termed<br />

them ''Chontal-Lencas."<br />

From the data obtainable it is impossible to define accurately the<br />

boundaries of the chief Lencan area. The writer has been guided<br />

in this respect chiefly by Squier (4:378 et seq.), omitting, of course,<br />

his conclusion that the Jicaque and Paya belong to the same stock<br />

as the Lenca. He was inclined to include geographically not only<br />

the department of San Miguel in Salvador and those of Santa<br />

Barbara and Comayagua in Honduras, but also Choluteca and parts<br />

of Tegucigalpa, Olancho, and Yoro in the latter state (as they were<br />

then defined); also the islands of Roatan and Guanaja. After<br />

eliminatmg the territories of the Jicaque and Paya the writer has<br />

outlined the Lencan territory to correspond as nearly as possible<br />

with the most recent data. As mapped it appears to conform, at<br />

least in a general way, with Sapper's determination, except that it<br />

adds a small extension into Nicaragua to include Squier's Chondal,<br />

w^ho, according to Brinton (3:149), are Lenca. It includes that<br />

part of San Salvador east of the Lempa river, the modern departments<br />

of Paraiso, Tegucigalpa, La Paz, Intibuca, Comayagua, and<br />

parts of Santa Barbara and Gracias in Honduras, and extends into the<br />

southern part of Segovia in Nicaragua.<br />

Tlascalteca<br />

This is a dialect of the Nahuatlan family, closely allied to the<br />

Tlascalan, which from a statement of Scherzer (456) appears to<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!