24.04.2013 Views

Untitled - Smithsonian Institution

Untitled - Smithsonian Institution

Untitled - Smithsonian Institution

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THOMAS] INDIAN LANGUAGES OF MEXICO AND CENTRAL AMERICA 63<br />

Orozco y Berra (1: 169) says the language is peculiar to Chiapas, and<br />

this conclusion is followed by most recent authorities. As we have<br />

seen, Juarros includes Palenque in the area in which this language was<br />

spoken. Brasseur de Bourbourg (1 : i, 63-64) hesitates between Tzental<br />

and Maya (proper), but the inscriptions agree better with the former<br />

than with the latter. According to the statement of Stoll (2:84),<br />

Doctor Berendt affirms that later the language spoken there was<br />

Choi, and this corresponds with Orozco y Berra's map and with<br />

Sapper's conclusion (2). It is therefore an undecided question how<br />

far northward the Tzental territory extended at the date of discovery.<br />

If Sapper's districting of the ruin -types (2: map viii) could be<br />

accepted as a correct mapping of ethnic divisions, the Choi formerly<br />

extended over the Chontal area, the Palenque region, and the section<br />

occupied by the western Lacandon. This evidence is not of a char-<br />

acter to be satisfactory in deciding this question, however, especially<br />

as Brinton,and apparently Berendt also, consider them relatively late<br />

comers to this region. The writer has been unable to fuid data<br />

on which to base a conclusion regarding tliis .<br />

question,<br />

but is<br />

inclined to agree with Sapper in considering the ruins of the middle<br />

and lower Usumacinta valley as more nearly allied to those of Copan<br />

and Quirigua than to those of the intermediate Peten region. In this<br />

comparison, which must be close, details as well as general forms<br />

must be appealed to. These bHng the ruins of Quirigua (which are<br />

ascribed by him to the Choi) and those of Copan (which he ascribes<br />

to the Chorti tribe) nearer to those of Palenque, Piedras Negras<br />

(see Mahler), and Menche m the Usumacinta valley than to those of<br />

the Peten region. This question will be further discussed, however,<br />

under Choi. The writer has followed Orozco y Berra chiefly, though<br />

not exactly, in outlining the area of the Tzental language.<br />

Chol<br />

The authorities differ widely as to the area over which this idiom<br />

was spoken. Orozco y Berra (1:167) says the Choi constituted a<br />

tribe established from remote times in Guatemala, which was divided<br />

into two factions by the incursions of the Maya. One of these divisions,<br />

he says, is encountered in eastern Chiapas, and the other, very<br />

isolated, in Vera Paz. He maps only the western division, as the<br />

other division lay beyond the Mexican boundary. Sapper, in his<br />

map V, which relates to present conditions, limits them to a small<br />

area in northern Chiapas, but in his map viii, showing the areas of<br />

the ruin-types, the Choi type is in two sections, of which the western<br />

covers eastern Tabasco and northeastern Chiapas extending into<br />

northwestern Guatemala; the eastern division includes the extreme<br />

northeastern corner of Guatemala and a strip of Honduras along its

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!