24.04.2013 Views

Untitled - Smithsonian Institution

Untitled - Smithsonian Institution

Untitled - Smithsonian Institution

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

66 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [bull. 44<br />

is very brief and, if the writer may judge, not very carefully taken,<br />

notwithstanding that Stoll has followed it, Chuje and Jacalteca (of<br />

which we have a fuller vocabulary) are certamly very closely allied.<br />

The latter was spoken throughout a small area around the pueblo<br />

of Jacaltenango near the northwestern boundary of Guatemala.<br />

This territory is included in the area marked xv (?) on Stoll's map.<br />

Misled by Juarres, Stoll has marked the red area around Jacaltenango<br />

as Pokomam territory, an error he subsequently corrected. (See<br />

Pohomam.) It is located on the present map, pending the discovery<br />

of further evidence as to relationship with the Chuje.<br />

Chuje<br />

(Synonym: Chuhe)<br />

This idiom, at present classed as a dialect of Choi, is most closely<br />

related to, if not identical with, Jacalteca; it is spoken now, accord-<br />

ing to Stoll (1:135), from Nenton to San Sebastian on the east.<br />

The area as marked by Sapper is in Guatemala near the western<br />

border, adjoining the Jacaltecan territory on the north, but does<br />

not include Nenton (or Neuton, as he writes it), leaving it a little to<br />

the west of the boundary he gives. His mapping is here followed,<br />

except that the boundary is carried westward to include Nenton.<br />

ACHIS<br />

It is said that this dialect (now extinct) was formerly spoken in Gua-<br />

temala—Brinton(3 : 158) says in eastern Guatemala. As yet the writer<br />

has found no data on which this conclusion could be based except a<br />

mere mention by Palacio (20). As he names this tribe in connection<br />

with the Mam, their location in the eastern part of the republic would<br />

seem to be incorrect. Is it not possible they were the Aguacateca<br />

or the jacalteca, tribes bordering the Mam territory ? Of course this<br />

name has not been placed on the map.<br />

Mam<br />

{Synonym: Zaklohpakap)<br />

As this language, which is considered one of the most archaic of<br />

the Mayan stock (Iluasteca alone standing before it in this respect),<br />

has been rather carefully studied, it is necessary to call attention<br />

only to the habitat of the tribe. This was the western portion of<br />

Guatemala, extending westward for a short distance into Soconusco<br />

and southward to the Pacific Ocean. As Stoll's map is restricted to<br />

Guatemala, it does not show the extension into Soconusco. Orozco y<br />

Berra marks a small area "Mamc" in the extreme southeastern corner<br />

of Soconusco, but Sapper gives a larger extension; the latter has been

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!