03.06.2013 Views

Brand, Identity and Reputation: Exploring, Creating New Realities ...

Brand, Identity and Reputation: Exploring, Creating New Realities ...

Brand, Identity and Reputation: Exploring, Creating New Realities ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A strategic investigation into the notion of corporate identity in the non-profit sector: a case study of Greenpeace<br />

Switzerl<strong>and</strong><br />

T C Melewar, Brunel University, U.K.<br />

Armin Ledergerber, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Switzerl<strong>and</strong><br />

In recent years the interest on corporate identity has significantly increased. Firms have realized the strategic value of a<br />

strong corporate identity <strong>and</strong> its importance for competitive advantage. Corporate identity can help companies align<br />

themselves with the marketplace, attract investment, motivate employees <strong>and</strong> it also serves as a means of differentiating<br />

their products <strong>and</strong> services from the competing br<strong>and</strong>s (Melewar & Karaosmanoglu, 2006). Interestingly, nongovernmental<br />

<strong>and</strong> non-profit organisations have became more aware of the management of their identity due to<br />

increased competition in this sector (Balmer & Gray, 2000). Melewar <strong>and</strong> Jenkins (2002) have developed the corporate<br />

identity model which consists of the constructs namely, communication <strong>and</strong> visual identity, behaviour, corporate culture<br />

<strong>and</strong> market conditions. The recategorisation of Melewar‘s corporate identity dimensions by Melewar <strong>and</strong><br />

Karaosmanoglu (2006) lead to a concept with seven categories that is more comprehensive <strong>and</strong> thorough. This model<br />

will be used as a framework for analysing the role of corporate identity in the non-profit sector.<br />

The main objective of this paper is to analyze issues of corporate identity within the context of the model presented by<br />

Melewar <strong>and</strong> Karaosmanoglu (2006) using Greenpeace Switzerl<strong>and</strong> as a case study. Several secondary <strong>and</strong> primary<br />

sources were used to generate the data. The main secondary resource was company literature, including content from<br />

Greenpeace-related websites, the organisation‘s profile document <strong>and</strong> press releases. Primary research included<br />

discussions <strong>and</strong> personal interviews with Greenpeace management <strong>and</strong> staff.<br />

Greenpeace was founded in 1971 in Vancouver. The Swiss office opened in 1984. Now, Greenpeace is present in more<br />

than 40 countries. The organisation exists to expose environmental criminals, to challenge government <strong>and</strong> corporations<br />

when they fail to live up to their m<strong>and</strong>ate to safeguard the environment <strong>and</strong> the future (Greenpeace International, 2010;<br />

Greenpeace Switzerl<strong>and</strong>, 2010).<br />

Greenpeace Switzerl<strong>and</strong> communicates over various channels with a wide range of media to all kind of stakeholders.<br />

Uncontrolled communications takes place by campaigns of their large support community or their local groups. The<br />

organisation encourages also their members to participate with their voice on the ongoing communication to relevant<br />

issues. Inspite of a stringent central comm<strong>and</strong>, the application of the communication <strong>and</strong> design guidelines is not<br />

possible. The br<strong>and</strong> recognition works due to the strong awareness level in Switzerl<strong>and</strong>.<br />

The worldwide shared fundamental values, beliefs <strong>and</strong> intentions as well as the common history are strong elements of<br />

the corporate culture <strong>and</strong> serve as a driving force for the cohesion between the mother organisation, the local offices <strong>and</strong><br />

their numerous members. The corporate culture also influences the behaviour of the organisation <strong>and</strong> their members by<br />

following the credo of radical, non-violent <strong>and</strong> international coordinated actions. This cultural behaviour is often in<br />

contrast to other non-profit <strong>and</strong> non-governmental organisations acting in the same field. Greenpeace is different from<br />

those organisations by following the strategy of non-violent campaigning combined with public relations activities.<br />

In conclusion, the case study about Greenpeace gives an insight into an organisation interacting heavily with its<br />

members <strong>and</strong> the public <strong>and</strong> shows how such an open system behaves in terms of the seven dimension of corporate<br />

identity.<br />

References<br />

Balmer, J. M. T., & Gray, E. R. (2000). Corporate identity <strong>and</strong> corporate communications: creating a competitive advantage. Industrial <strong>and</strong><br />

Commercial Training, 32(7).<br />

Greenpeace International. (2010). About Greenpeace. Retrieved February 9, 2010, from http://www.greenpeace.org/international/about<br />

Greenpeace Switzerl<strong>and</strong>. (2010). Organisation. Retrieved February 9, 2010, from http://www.greenpeace.ch/de/ueber-uns/organisation/<br />

Melewar, T. C., & Jenkins, E. (2002). Defining the corporate identity construct. Corporate <strong>Reputation</strong> Review, 5(1), 76-90.<br />

Melewar, T. C., & Karaosmanoglu, E. (2006). Seven dimensions of corporate identity: A categorisation from the practitioners' perspectives. European<br />

Journal of Marketing, 40(7/8), 846-869.<br />

191

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!