Brand, Identity and Reputation: Exploring, Creating New Realities ...
Brand, Identity and Reputation: Exploring, Creating New Realities ...
Brand, Identity and Reputation: Exploring, Creating New Realities ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
A strategic investigation into the notion of corporate identity in the non-profit sector: a case study of Greenpeace<br />
Switzerl<strong>and</strong><br />
T C Melewar, Brunel University, U.K.<br />
Armin Ledergerber, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Switzerl<strong>and</strong><br />
In recent years the interest on corporate identity has significantly increased. Firms have realized the strategic value of a<br />
strong corporate identity <strong>and</strong> its importance for competitive advantage. Corporate identity can help companies align<br />
themselves with the marketplace, attract investment, motivate employees <strong>and</strong> it also serves as a means of differentiating<br />
their products <strong>and</strong> services from the competing br<strong>and</strong>s (Melewar & Karaosmanoglu, 2006). Interestingly, nongovernmental<br />
<strong>and</strong> non-profit organisations have became more aware of the management of their identity due to<br />
increased competition in this sector (Balmer & Gray, 2000). Melewar <strong>and</strong> Jenkins (2002) have developed the corporate<br />
identity model which consists of the constructs namely, communication <strong>and</strong> visual identity, behaviour, corporate culture<br />
<strong>and</strong> market conditions. The recategorisation of Melewar‘s corporate identity dimensions by Melewar <strong>and</strong><br />
Karaosmanoglu (2006) lead to a concept with seven categories that is more comprehensive <strong>and</strong> thorough. This model<br />
will be used as a framework for analysing the role of corporate identity in the non-profit sector.<br />
The main objective of this paper is to analyze issues of corporate identity within the context of the model presented by<br />
Melewar <strong>and</strong> Karaosmanoglu (2006) using Greenpeace Switzerl<strong>and</strong> as a case study. Several secondary <strong>and</strong> primary<br />
sources were used to generate the data. The main secondary resource was company literature, including content from<br />
Greenpeace-related websites, the organisation‘s profile document <strong>and</strong> press releases. Primary research included<br />
discussions <strong>and</strong> personal interviews with Greenpeace management <strong>and</strong> staff.<br />
Greenpeace was founded in 1971 in Vancouver. The Swiss office opened in 1984. Now, Greenpeace is present in more<br />
than 40 countries. The organisation exists to expose environmental criminals, to challenge government <strong>and</strong> corporations<br />
when they fail to live up to their m<strong>and</strong>ate to safeguard the environment <strong>and</strong> the future (Greenpeace International, 2010;<br />
Greenpeace Switzerl<strong>and</strong>, 2010).<br />
Greenpeace Switzerl<strong>and</strong> communicates over various channels with a wide range of media to all kind of stakeholders.<br />
Uncontrolled communications takes place by campaigns of their large support community or their local groups. The<br />
organisation encourages also their members to participate with their voice on the ongoing communication to relevant<br />
issues. Inspite of a stringent central comm<strong>and</strong>, the application of the communication <strong>and</strong> design guidelines is not<br />
possible. The br<strong>and</strong> recognition works due to the strong awareness level in Switzerl<strong>and</strong>.<br />
The worldwide shared fundamental values, beliefs <strong>and</strong> intentions as well as the common history are strong elements of<br />
the corporate culture <strong>and</strong> serve as a driving force for the cohesion between the mother organisation, the local offices <strong>and</strong><br />
their numerous members. The corporate culture also influences the behaviour of the organisation <strong>and</strong> their members by<br />
following the credo of radical, non-violent <strong>and</strong> international coordinated actions. This cultural behaviour is often in<br />
contrast to other non-profit <strong>and</strong> non-governmental organisations acting in the same field. Greenpeace is different from<br />
those organisations by following the strategy of non-violent campaigning combined with public relations activities.<br />
In conclusion, the case study about Greenpeace gives an insight into an organisation interacting heavily with its<br />
members <strong>and</strong> the public <strong>and</strong> shows how such an open system behaves in terms of the seven dimension of corporate<br />
identity.<br />
References<br />
Balmer, J. M. T., & Gray, E. R. (2000). Corporate identity <strong>and</strong> corporate communications: creating a competitive advantage. Industrial <strong>and</strong><br />
Commercial Training, 32(7).<br />
Greenpeace International. (2010). About Greenpeace. Retrieved February 9, 2010, from http://www.greenpeace.org/international/about<br />
Greenpeace Switzerl<strong>and</strong>. (2010). Organisation. Retrieved February 9, 2010, from http://www.greenpeace.ch/de/ueber-uns/organisation/<br />
Melewar, T. C., & Jenkins, E. (2002). Defining the corporate identity construct. Corporate <strong>Reputation</strong> Review, 5(1), 76-90.<br />
Melewar, T. C., & Karaosmanoglu, E. (2006). Seven dimensions of corporate identity: A categorisation from the practitioners' perspectives. European<br />
Journal of Marketing, 40(7/8), 846-869.<br />
191