Brand, Identity and Reputation: Exploring, Creating New Realities ...
Brand, Identity and Reputation: Exploring, Creating New Realities ...
Brand, Identity and Reputation: Exploring, Creating New Realities ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Uncovering ‗Meanings‘ through Animal Figurative Marks in Corporate Logos<br />
Tayo Otubanjo, Pan African University, Nigeria<br />
Abstract<br />
A number of financial institutions are hung on the use of pictorial metaphors of animal marks in corporate logos as tools<br />
for creating meanings even though such logos are no longer fashionable. This paper deconstructs a couple of these logos.<br />
Specifically, this study examines how corporate logos with animal marks create <strong>and</strong> institutionalize meanings in the<br />
minds of customers. A modified form of McCracken‘s meaning transfer model together with a three phase interpretive<br />
framework, comprising literary criticism, semiotic method <strong>and</strong> interpretive interviews, are drawn as the framework of<br />
study. Findings from the deconstruction of corporate logos with animal marks – belonging to First Bank Plc <strong>and</strong> Union<br />
Bank Plc, two of the largest banks in Nigeria, indicates that meanings that are adduced to these banks evolves through a<br />
collaborative system of continuous or uninterrupted exposure of animal marks <strong>and</strong> costumer habitualized beliefs.<br />
Keywords: animal marks, corporate br<strong>and</strong>ing, corporate logo, corporate identity, habitualization, institutionalization,<br />
interpretive interviews, literary criticism, meanings, semiotic method, signs.<br />
Introduction<br />
The use of animal figurative marks in corporate logos has played a significant role in corporate communications over a<br />
long period of time. For hundreds of years, animal marks have been used to symbolize, communicate <strong>and</strong> express the<br />
personality of business organizations. A quick review of a variety of corporate logos especially those belonging to a<br />
number of large, reputable financial institutions suggests that there has been a shift from the use of animal marks (such<br />
as horses, bulls, bear, eagles, lions, tigers <strong>and</strong> similar ferocious faunas) towards more simplified versions of currently<br />
fashionable <strong>and</strong> expensive works of art. Figures 1-4 supports this argument.<br />
Figures 1-4: Movement of Deutsche Bank logo (animal mark) in 1870 to today‘s work of art<br />
Source: http://www.db.com/en/media/Logo_History.pdf<br />
Source: http://www.db.com/index_e.htm<br />
Source: http://worldsbestlogos.blogspot.com/2007_11_01_archive.html<br />
Source: http://www.abnamro.com<br />
In spite of this movement however, the use of logos with animal marks persists. A h<strong>and</strong>ful of business organizations<br />
that continue to use this type of logo, do so ideally to build an association with traditions <strong>and</strong> socio-cultural meanings<br />
through the corporate br<strong>and</strong>ing process. Because corporate logos with animal marks are deemed as obsolete, oldfashioned<br />
<strong>and</strong> outdated, some stakeholders within the business environment think less highly of them. Yet, they are<br />
highly effective at helping business organizations to deliver strategic messages about their personalities.<br />
Just as there are very few business organizations that use corporate logos with animal marks in today‘s business<br />
environment, there are also very few academic literatures on this subject. The majority of studies in the broader field of<br />
corporate visual identity (see Table 1) which encompasses the study of logos are void of knowledge on the construction<br />
of animal marks.<br />
Table 1: Corporate visual identity literature<br />
A peep into business literature on corporate visual<br />
identity<br />
Source: developed by author<br />
Melewar et al, 2006; Melewar et al, 2001; Melewar et al,<br />
2000; Melewar <strong>and</strong> Saunders, 1998; Melewar <strong>and</strong><br />
Saunders, 1999a; Melewar <strong>and</strong> Saunders, 1999b;<br />
Melewar <strong>and</strong> Saunders, 2000; Melewar, 2001; Mollerup,<br />
2004; Carls, 1989; Carter, 1975, 1976, 1982, 1983,<br />
1985, 1986, 1997; Henderson <strong>and</strong> Cote, 1998; Napoles,<br />
1998; Olins, 1978, 1979, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1995;<br />
Pilditch, 1970; Hynes, 2009; van den Bosch et al, 2004;<br />
van den Bosch et al, 2005; van den Bosch et al, 2006;<br />
van Riel <strong>and</strong> van den Ban, 2000; van Riel <strong>and</strong> van den<br />
Ban, 2001<br />
65