03.06.2013 Views

Brand, Identity and Reputation: Exploring, Creating New Realities ...

Brand, Identity and Reputation: Exploring, Creating New Realities ...

Brand, Identity and Reputation: Exploring, Creating New Realities ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Validation of <strong>Br<strong>and</strong></strong> Experience Instrument to measure Young Consumers Experience with Fashion <strong>Br<strong>and</strong></strong>s<br />

Ahmed Rageh, Fayoum University, Egypt<br />

T C Melewar, Brunel University, U.K.<br />

Marc Fetscherin, Rollins College, USA<br />

Abstract<br />

<strong>Br<strong>and</strong></strong> experience is a relatively new concept in the marketing literature. It has been considered <strong>and</strong> important element<br />

in underst<strong>and</strong>ing consumer behaviour. This study, through primary data collection <strong>and</strong> analysis, validates <strong>and</strong> extends a<br />

br<strong>and</strong> experience scale initially proposed by Brakus et al (2009) to the fashion industry. The results show that the scale<br />

should be modified to be relevant in the evaluation of fashion br<strong>and</strong>s choices. The emerging fashion br<strong>and</strong> experience<br />

scale is the first step towards the conceptualisation of fashion br<strong>and</strong> experience <strong>and</strong> may be useful for practitioners<br />

when profiling purchasing customers.<br />

Keywords: <strong>Br<strong>and</strong></strong> experience, measurement, constructs validity, fashion br<strong>and</strong>s.<br />

Introduction<br />

Pine <strong>and</strong> Gilmore (1999) describe the existing economy as ‗the new experience economy‘ highlighting an increasing<br />

tendency towards delivering a configuration of unique, rewarding, <strong>and</strong> fulfilling (URF) experience to gain a competitive<br />

advantage. A careful review of the extant marketing literature revealed that there have been few attempts to define the<br />

concept of customer experience <strong>and</strong> its dimensions. In other words, the concept is poorly defined (Caru <strong>and</strong> Cova,<br />

2003). A recent attempt by Brakus et al., (2009) has conceptualized br<strong>and</strong> experience as subjective, internal consumer<br />

responses (sensations, feelings, <strong>and</strong> cognitions) <strong>and</strong> behavioural responses evoked by br<strong>and</strong>-related stimuli that are part<br />

of a br<strong>and</strong>‘s design <strong>and</strong> identity, packaging, communications, <strong>and</strong> environments. To date no empirical studies have<br />

validated the br<strong>and</strong> experience scale proposed by Brakus et al (2009) <strong>and</strong> this work aims to fill such gap.<br />

Dimensions of <strong>Br<strong>and</strong></strong> Experience<br />

The ‗multi-aspect‘ conceptualization of experience can be traced back to Holbrook <strong>and</strong> Hirschman (1982) when they<br />

conceptualized the consumption experience under the heading of ―Fantasies, feelings <strong>and</strong> fun‖. The experience<br />

dimensions are evoked by br<strong>and</strong>-related stimuli (e.g., colours, shapes, typefaces, designs, slogans, mascots, br<strong>and</strong><br />

characters). There is no one-to-one correspondence, such that a certain stimulus type would trigger a certain experience<br />

dimension <strong>and</strong> only that dimension. For example, although colours, shapes, typefaces, <strong>and</strong> designs usually result in<br />

sensory experience, they may also result in emotions (e.g., red for Coca-Cola) or intellectual experiences (e.g., when<br />

designs use complex patterns). (Barakus et al., 2009, p.53)<br />

The pioneers of the experience economy Pine <strong>and</strong> Gilmore (1999) claimed that experience consists of four dimensions:<br />

aesthetic, educational, entertaining, <strong>and</strong> escapist experiences. Additionally, Schmitt (1999) proposes five experiences:<br />

sense, feel, think, act, <strong>and</strong> relate. On the basis of the above literature, Brakus et al., (2009) developed a br<strong>and</strong> experience<br />

scale that captures the dimensions of br<strong>and</strong> experience. They employed a series of exploratory <strong>and</strong> confirmatory factor<br />

analyses for item reduction <strong>and</strong> confirmation of dimensions. the authors came up with four dimensions: sensory,<br />

affective, behavioural, <strong>and</strong> intellectual factors. They generated items for scale development along the five experience<br />

dimensions that were used in the current study.<br />

This research is based on the observation that when consumers complete br<strong>and</strong> experience scales, some of the scales‘<br />

items are not usually relevant, <strong>and</strong> that will depend on the br<strong>and</strong> being assessed. Additionally, it may be relevant to<br />

extend the current br<strong>and</strong> experience scale so as to encompass determinant factors that are specific of the product or of<br />

the industry under assessment.<br />

Methods<br />

Given the effort employed by fashion managers to develop fashion brads as to evoke a customer experience, this study<br />

has selected fashion br<strong>and</strong>s as the application domain to ascertain the validation of the brad experience scale developed<br />

by Brakus et al (2009) Moreover, this study selected young consumers for the validation of the br<strong>and</strong> experience scale<br />

due to their interest in identifying themselves with the experience that the fashion br<strong>and</strong>s they purchase can generate,<br />

rather than simply the clothes.<br />

<strong>Br<strong>and</strong></strong> experience scale developed by Brakus et al., (2009) is used in this study to assess consumer experience with their<br />

br<strong>and</strong>s through four dimensions: sensory, affective, behavioural <strong>and</strong> intellectual. There are three items in each<br />

dimension; every item uses a 7-point Likert scale for measurement ranging from ―1=strongly disagree to 7=strongly<br />

agree‖. The data collection was conducted in London among undergraduate students at Brunel University. Selfadministered<br />

questionnaires were distributed among university students. A sample of 75 students was selected with ages<br />

between 16 <strong>and</strong> 22 years old. Respondents with age less than 16 years represent 1.3%, students with ages between 16<br />

<strong>and</strong> less than 22 represents 74.7% <strong>and</strong> student with ages more than 22 represents 24% of the total sample. Students were<br />

from both genders (33.3% male <strong>and</strong> 66.7% female).<br />

212

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!