03.06.2013 Views

Brand, Identity and Reputation: Exploring, Creating New Realities ...

Brand, Identity and Reputation: Exploring, Creating New Realities ...

Brand, Identity and Reputation: Exploring, Creating New Realities ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Research questions <strong>and</strong> methodology<br />

This study looks at corporate br<strong>and</strong> management <strong>and</strong> links a corporation‘s br<strong>and</strong> identity to family values. It focuses on<br />

management who try to establish a "family feel". <strong>Br<strong>and</strong></strong> identity content can be detected either in a actual,<br />

communicated or even ideal identity (see Balmers AC 3 ID Test, Balmer, Stuart & Greyser 2009).<br />

The key question, this study addresses, is: ‗When <strong>and</strong> why does family add value <strong>and</strong> act as a differentiator between<br />

br<strong>and</strong>s?‘ To answer this question this paper initially examines the extent to which family is currently being used as a<br />

differentiator. The research is based on a case sample of four different industries. All cases are discussed within a<br />

proposed framework that comprises family feel indicators observable through secondary research. To explore this topic<br />

we have developed a framework to identify if a company presents a family ‗feel‘ either externally or internally through<br />

br<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> communication (Memili, Kimberly, Kellermanns, Zellweger & Barnett 2010).<br />

Underst<strong>and</strong>ing weather a family feel is used as part of a corporation‘s identity will lead to us addressing the following<br />

key questions surrounding family <strong>and</strong> br<strong>and</strong> management: (1) Should management address ‗family‘ as a value? (2) Is<br />

family a differantiator? (3) Should a corporation adopted by a family focus on its (face) value? (4) Can management<br />

play the family value <strong>and</strong> are there risks of overplaying it? (5) How much should ‗family‘ be emphasised by the<br />

corporate br<strong>and</strong>? (6) When <strong>and</strong> why does a true <strong>and</strong> sustainable family feel add value to the corporate br<strong>and</strong>? (7) When<br />

does family br<strong>and</strong> value have a positive influence on the leadership of the company? (8) And how to play "family" into<br />

the internal <strong>and</strong> external perception of the company?<br />

Family businesses can be found in almost all industries. For our research we selected four sectors; retail, construction<br />

materials, health care <strong>and</strong> banking. All of these industries are global <strong>and</strong> established in almost all markets. Between our<br />

four sectors we represent both business to consumer <strong>and</strong> business to business concerns.<br />

Findings <strong>and</strong> practical implications<br />

The findings un-earthed following the initial secondary research that this article presents will not tell us definitively<br />

when <strong>and</strong> how family adds value to a business. What it gives instead is a set of "indicators" that allow us to identify the<br />

presence of a "family feel" within any organisation. These "indicators" lead to a framework in which family business<br />

<strong>and</strong> br<strong>and</strong> management will be discussed. At this level of findings, indicators are split into external <strong>and</strong> internal usage.<br />

External indicators: (1) Family founding name included in company name: Made via an unconscious decision or<br />

planned by management, naming can evoke a specific family feel, even if family members are not part of the company<br />

anymore. (2) Family referred to the company‘s values: The family represents a specific attitude to business <strong>and</strong> it is part<br />

of external communication <strong>and</strong> approach to business. (3) Family story prominent in company history: The personal<br />

story of the family is directly linked to the corporate br<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> used in external communication. (4) The notion of<br />

family used by external communications: Family as a stereotype is used in advertising <strong>and</strong> corporate communications.<br />

(5) Family imagery or films used: Portrayal of family imagery in br<strong>and</strong>ed external communcation. (6) <strong>Br<strong>and</strong></strong> symbols<br />

<strong>and</strong> are directly linked to the family (i.e. a signature logo)<br />

Internal indicators: (1) Family members present in management: Owners concentrate on internal management. (2)<br />

Family members present in supervisory board: Family presence is limited to corporate governance <strong>and</strong> not used<br />

regularly in public <strong>and</strong> management. (3) Family name included in company name: Family is part of the heritage without<br />

being involved in actual management <strong>and</strong> ownership. (4) Family values referred to in recruitment information: Family<br />

values are strongly used throughout the entire recruitment processes. (5) The notion of family used by internal<br />

communications or initiatives: i.e. celebrating corporate anniversaries are strongly linked to a sense of family. (6)<br />

Family imagery or films used for recruitment: A sense of family is part of the recruitment argument.<br />

The key finding is a framework that can lead to aiding management decisions within family owned business or be used<br />

as a platform for further research about corporate family heritage <strong>and</strong> br<strong>and</strong> management. Summarising the results of<br />

the study, it detects several major gaps in regards to companies presenting a non-coherent internal <strong>and</strong> external family<br />

feel which present avenues for further exploration around br<strong>and</strong> alignment <strong>and</strong> authenticity.<br />

Amongst other cases the study presents finding in which strong family businesses only use a family approach internally.<br />

In terms of their external communicated br<strong>and</strong> identity (Balmer et al. 2009) other values <strong>and</strong> stereotypes are used <strong>and</strong><br />

replace any outward family feel. This situation causes important br<strong>and</strong> management issues that should be explored <strong>and</strong><br />

addressed.<br />

An even more dramatic situation is described in the study when a family feel is used externally despite the fact that<br />

there is no family present within the business. The gap of authenticity stretches the br<strong>and</strong> across customer <strong>and</strong><br />

stakeholder expectations. Such an approach needs to be managed carefully from a br<strong>and</strong> perspective in order to satisfy<br />

all relevant parties.<br />

99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!