To be or not to be: this is shopping Sensory br<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> self satisfaction Luca Petruzzellis, University of Bari; Italy Richard Michon, Ryerson University, Canada Jean-Charles Chebat, HEC Montréal, Canada Claire Gélinas-Chebat, UQAM, Canada Consumption is much more than the simple purchase of products <strong>and</strong> services. It is a way of self expression, individual identity formation, creativity, or even art (Gabriel & Lang, 1995; Schmitt 1999). It involves experiential <strong>and</strong> instrumental outcomes, which means that the socio-psychological characteristics of individuals <strong>and</strong> behavioural variables are powerful cues to influence the consumption model (Babin, Darden & Griffin, 1994). Therefore, shopping has three key dimensions, namely the ‗shopping environment‘, the ‗socio-cultural context‘ <strong>and</strong> the ‗roles, motivations <strong>and</strong> behaviour‘ of the individual shopper (Woodruffe, Eccles & Elliott, 2002). A causal link between the consumer self concept <strong>and</strong> his/her shopping behavior exists (Sirgy et al., 2000; Chebat, Sirgy & St-James, 2006; Kaltcheva, Chebat & Patino, 2010;), that, in turn, is mediated by the effect a store atmosphere (Babin & Darden, 1995). Some of the atmospheric elements of a shopping environment may be cognitively processed as nonverbal cues, which in turn, may impact product evaluations, etc., without the direct involvement of affective processes such as mood (Spangenberg, Crowley & Henderson, 1996; Chebat & Michon, 2003; Morrin & Ratneshwar, 2003). Many aspects of the retail ambience such as crowding, colors, layout, influence customer emotions <strong>and</strong> attitudes (Bellizzi, Crowley & Hasty, 1983; Bellizzi & Hite, 1992; Baker, Grewal & Parasuraman, 1994; Machleit, Kellaris & Eroglu, 1994; Sherman, Makur & Belk Smith, 1997; Babin, Hardesty & Suter, 2003). The main objective of the paper is to underst<strong>and</strong> the phenomenon of self-satisfaction. The basic assumption of the paper is that consumers are satisfied with their choice not when they use the product/br<strong>and</strong> they bought but when enter the shop; while browsing in the shop consumers identify themselves with the store <strong>and</strong> br<strong>and</strong>s sold in it. The environment encompasses the consumer identity, exchanging with him/her identity <strong>and</strong> personality features. People are satisfied with stores <strong>and</strong> br<strong>and</strong>s that contribute to increasing their self concept, identity <strong>and</strong> personality. A sample of 70 tattooed people were interviewed in order to underst<strong>and</strong> the determinants of self satisfaction. They were asked to describe how they feel when they enter a store <strong>and</strong> what attracts most while shopping. Tattooed people were chosen since they show a higher confidence with their self concept; a tattoo is seen as a form of marking identity (Lévi Strauss, 1955, 220; Velliquette, Murray & Creyer, 1998). In fact, the body increasingly becomes represented as an integral part of self construction <strong>and</strong> achieves new meanings <strong>and</strong> a new status that consumers learn through socialization (Sweetman, 2000). People with no more than 3 tattoos were chosen as tattoos were used as cues of fashion/style <strong>and</strong> self confidence <strong>and</strong> not of belonging to tribes, subcultures or groups or a sort of mania (S<strong>and</strong>ers, 1988; Velliquette et al., 1998; Goulding et al., 2004). Previous research has indicated that shopping behaviour is influenced by several factors such as consumer demographics <strong>and</strong> psychographics (Gilbert & Warren, 1995), usage situation (de la Fuente & Yague, 2008), price sensitivity (Han, Gupta & Lehman, 2001), social referents (Bearden & Etzel, 1982; Escales & Bettman, 2003), involvement (Michaelidou & Dibb, 2008), need recognition (Grønhaug & Venkatesh, 1991), product category (Mehta, 2007) <strong>and</strong> so on. Therefore, consumer response proves to be cognitively as well as affectively driven by a number of factors that impact consumer attitudes, perceptions <strong>and</strong> shopping behaviors (Bellizi & Hite, 1992). Most of the stimuli are related to atmospherics (Kotler, 1974; Bitner, 1992), which has various facets (Turley & Milliman, 2000); music (Herrington & Capella, 1996; Milliman, 1982; Yalch & Spangenberg, 1990), crowding (Hui, Dube & Chebat, 1997; Michon, Chebat & Turley, 2005), effective exterior store windows (Edwards & Shackley, 1992), lighting (Areni & Kim, 1995), store layout (Smith & Burns, 1996) <strong>and</strong> merch<strong>and</strong>ise arrangement (Areni, Duhan & Kiecker, 1999). Indeed, atmospherics may sometimes operate primarily via cognitive rather than affective routes (Chebat & Michon, 2003). In such a scenario the experiences consumers live in a store or social environment (Fazio, Effrein & Falender, 1981; Markus & Kunda, 1986) <strong>and</strong> the social roles they perform in it (Foreh<strong>and</strong> & Deshp<strong>and</strong>e, 2001; Foreh<strong>and</strong> et al., 2002) influence, or better evoke, the self-concept components, namely dispositional characteristics <strong>and</strong> traits; perceptions of the ongoing or past experiences, social roles, <strong>and</strong> behaviors; self-related attitudes <strong>and</strong> affect (Sirgy, 1982; Markus & Wurf, 1987). Chebat et al. (2006) found that upscale shopping mall environments elicit upscale self-relevant attributes. Since people are likely to view themselves as more upscale than they actually are, consumers feel higher self-congruity with upscale shopping malls <strong>and</strong> evaluate the stores located in such malls more positively (Chebat et al., 2006). 256
Generally speaking, people use external cues such as hairstyles, jewelry, clothing <strong>and</strong> cosmetics to display gender, status, values, interests, opinions, lifestyles, roles, <strong>and</strong> other identity features. Indeed, as people use these nonverbal signs <strong>and</strong> symbols to communicate individual <strong>and</strong> group identity <strong>and</strong> form opinion on other people, as consumers they use such cues to infer the status of the store <strong>and</strong> the products sold in it <strong>and</strong> consequently they start to feel satisfied. In choice <strong>and</strong> buying tasks consumers show <strong>and</strong> form their situational self image (Schenk & Holman, 1980) that includes attitudes, perceptions <strong>and</strong> emotions with which a person would like to be associated to. Therefore, consumers decide to show the image that better fit a particular situation, thus assigning a greater value not only to possessions but also to the environment. Tattoo is a vehicle for human expression; for example, it may represent a signal of accomplishment (Gritton, 1988), group membership (Drewal, 1988), social status (Gathercole, 1988), willingness to please a lover (Bohannan, 1988), or temporary adornment (Rubin, 1988). Most of the literature associates the tattoo with the extended self; the tattoo reflects an image of the self that has positive symbolism rather than the inner self (Velliquette et al., 1998). Tattoo is an ultimate form of br<strong>and</strong>ing. According to the legend, the origin of the term br<strong>and</strong> comes from br<strong>and</strong>r, the Norse word for fire. It means to burn the mark of the producer onto the product that they made (Ritson, 2006). Structural anthropology (e.g., Levis-strauss, 1958; Barthes, 1983) is the natural hermeneutics framework for analyzing symbols, tattoos <strong>and</strong> fashion behavior. Fashion statements that are rich in rhetoric (van Leeuwin, 1983) allow researchers to decipher vestimentary codes <strong>and</strong> fashion value shaping the construction of consumers‘ self-congruency (Sirgy et al., 2000) <strong>and</strong> self-identity (Marion, 1983). Content analysis looks at the semiotics of a) body br<strong>and</strong>ing (tattoos), b) vestimentary codes, c) fashion br<strong>and</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> d) store image. The main result highlights the congruity between a consumer‘s identity <strong>and</strong> the store ambience. In general, the respondents match their personality with the store they patronize <strong>and</strong> the br<strong>and</strong>s they are buying. The first elements that contribute to the satisfaction process are the display (layout/furniture) <strong>and</strong> the staff attitude. The respondents pointed out that if the external environment is calm (cool), then it reflects in the internal situation (mind) <strong>and</strong> in the predisposition to shopping <strong>and</strong> it is more inclined to satisfaction. References Areni, C.S., & Kim, D. (1995). The influence of in-store lighting on consumers‘ examination of merch<strong>and</strong>ise in a wine store. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 11(4), 117-125. Areni, C.S., Duhan, D.F., & Kiecker, P. (1999). Point-of-purchase displays, product organization, <strong>and</strong> br<strong>and</strong> purchase likelihood. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 27(4), 428-441. Babin, B.J., & Darden, W.R. (1995). Consumer self-regulation in a retail environment. Journal of Retailing, 71, 47-70. Babin, B.J., Darden, W.R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work <strong>and</strong>/or fun: Measuring hedonic <strong>and</strong> utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 644-656. Babin, B.J., Hardesty, D.A., & Suter, T. (2003). Color <strong>and</strong> shopping intentions: the intervening effect of price fairness <strong>and</strong> perceived affect. Journal of Business Research, 56, 541–551. Baker, J., Grewal, D., & Parasuraman, A. (1994). The influence of store environment on quality inferences <strong>and</strong> store image. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 22(4), 328-339. Barthes, R. (1983). The Fashion System. <strong>New</strong> York: Hill. Barthes, R. (2006). The Language of Fashion. Oxford: Berg/Power Publications, 2006. Bearden, W.O., & Etzel, M.J. (1982). Reference Group Influence on Product <strong>and</strong> <strong>Br<strong>and</strong></strong> Purchase Decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 183-194. Bellizzi, .J.A., Crowley, A.E., & Hasty, R.W. (1983). The effects of color in store design. Journal of Retailing, 59,21–45. Bellizzi, J.A., & Hite, R.E. (1992). Environmental color, consumer feelings, <strong>and</strong> purchase likelihood. Psychology <strong>and</strong> Marketing, 9, 347-363. Bitner, M.J. (1992). Servicescapes: The impact of physical surroundings <strong>and</strong> employee responses. Journal of Marketing, 56, 57–71. Bohannan, P. (1988). Beauty <strong>and</strong> Scarification Amongst the Tiv. In A. Rubin (ed.), Marks of Civilization (77-82). Los Angeles: Museum of Cultural History. Chebat, J.-C., & Michon, R. (2003). Impact of Ambient Odors on Mall Shoppers‘ Emotions, Cognition <strong>and</strong> Spending: A Test of Competitive Causal Theories. Journal of Business Research, 56, 529-539. Chebat, J.-C., Sirgy, M.J., & St-James, V. (2006). Upscale image transfer from malls to stores: A self-image congruence explanation. Journal of Business Research, 59, 1288–1296. de la Fuente, J.R., & Yague, G.J.M. (2008). Re-incorporating usage situation in choice models: a base for future developments. Journal of Marketing Management, 24(3- 4), 245-263. Drewal, H.J. (1988). Beauty <strong>and</strong> Being: Aesthetics <strong>and</strong> Ontology in Yoruba Body Art. In A. Rubin (ed.), Marks of Civilization (83-96). Los Angeles: Museum of Cultural History. Edwards, S., & Shackley, M. (1992). Measuring the effectiveness of retail window display as an element of the marketing mix. International Journal of Advertising, 11, 193-202. Escales, J.E., & Bettman, J.R. (2003). You are what they eat: The influence of reference groups on consumer's connections to br<strong>and</strong>s. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13, 339−348. Fazio, R.H., Effrein, E.A., & Falender, V.J. (1981). Self-perceptions following social interaction. Journal of Personality <strong>and</strong> Social Psychology, 41(2), 232–242. Foreh<strong>and</strong>, M.R., & Deshp<strong>and</strong>e, R. (2001). What we see makes us who we are: priming ethnic self awareness <strong>and</strong> advertising response. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(3), 336-348. Foreh<strong>and</strong>, M.R., Deshp<strong>and</strong>e, R., & Reed, A. (2002). <strong>Identity</strong> salience <strong>and</strong> the influence of differential activation of the social self-schema on advertising response. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6), pp. 1086-1099. Gabriel, Y., & Lang, T. (1995). The unmanageable consumer: contemporary consumption <strong>and</strong> its fragmentation. London: Sage Publications. Gathercole, P. (1988). Contexts of Maori Moko. In A. Rubin (ed.), Marks of Civilization (171-178). Los Angeles: Museum of Cultural History. Goulding, C., Follett, J., Saren, M., & McLaren, P. (2004). Process <strong>and</strong> Meaning in Getting a Tattoo. Advances in Consumer Research, 31, 447-456. Gritton, J. (1988). Labrets <strong>and</strong> Tattooing in Native Alaska. In A. Rubin (ed.), Marks of Civilization (181-190). Los Angeles: Museum of Cultural History. Grønhaug, K., & Venkatesh, A. (1991). Needs <strong>and</strong> need recognition in organisational buying. European Journal of Marketing, 25(2), 17-32. Han, S., Gupta, S., & Lehmann, D.R. (2001). Consumer price sensitivity <strong>and</strong> price thresholds. Journal of Retailing, 77(4), 435-456. Herrington, J.D., & Capella, L.M. (1996). Effects of music in service environments: a field study. Journal of Services Marketing, 10(2), 26-41. Hui, M., Dube, L., & Chebat, J.-C. (1997). The impact of music on consumers‘ reaction to waiting for services. Journal of Retailing, 73(1), 87-104. 257
- Page 1 and 2:
Book of Proceedings Brand, Identity
- Page 3 and 4:
Session 1.1 Emotional Branding in T
- Page 5 and 6:
p.31) consumers tend to those sourc
- Page 7 and 8:
Tables and figures Brand perception
- Page 9 and 10:
Malaysia‘s Global Halal Hub - ―
- Page 11 and 12:
Birds of a Feather Consume Sports T
- Page 13 and 14:
Session 1.2 How is Social Media, li
- Page 15 and 16:
2. Interviews made with the adminis
- Page 17 and 18:
Table-5 Facebook Members of Homeles
- Page 19 and 20:
content (UGC) or even direct intera
- Page 21 and 22:
Fierman, (1991) found that 47% of c
- Page 23 and 24:
Multiple Dimensions of Brand Identi
- Page 25 and 26:
Session 1.3 Corporate Identity, Cor
- Page 27 and 28:
CSR are the ideals and ethics of co
- Page 29 and 30:
Corporate Brand Identity Management
- Page 31 and 32:
To study the influence of B2B relat
- Page 33 and 34:
Antecedents And Consequences Of Bra
- Page 35 and 36:
22. Gurviez, P., and Korchia, M. (2
- Page 37 and 38:
Non-monetary factors, such as effor
- Page 39 and 40:
23. Holbrook, M.B. (2006). Consumpt
- Page 41 and 42:
Brand Extensions and Culture: The I
- Page 43 and 44:
avoidance tend to prefer more infor
- Page 45 and 46:
Virtual Internal Brand Communities:
- Page 47 and 48:
References 1. Algesheimer, R., Dhol
- Page 49 and 50:
associations based on their percept
- Page 51 and 52:
shift in the psychological contract
- Page 53 and 54:
10. Berthon, P., Ewing, M., & Hah,
- Page 55 and 56:
Session 2.1 Global Brand Relationsh
- Page 57 and 58:
G. Brand Personality Excitement Hon
- Page 59 and 60:
The Impact of Relationship Marketin
- Page 61 and 62:
‗United 2010-one for all, all for
- Page 63 and 64:
Brand Equity Trends in Top Global B
- Page 65 and 66:
Uncovering ‗Meanings‘ through A
- Page 67 and 68:
45. Melewar, T.C. and Saunders, J.
- Page 69 and 70:
Thus, from a design perspective, we
- Page 71 and 72:
Keywords Brands, marketing, meaning
- Page 73 and 74:
How Important is the Brand Name Ele
- Page 75 and 76:
References 1. Aaker, D. (1991). Man
- Page 77 and 78:
Simon Cowell and Branding the X Fac
- Page 79 and 80:
Dead or Living: Which Celebrity To
- Page 81 and 82:
Reference 1. Bagozzi, R.P. & Yi, Y.
- Page 83 and 84:
has been adopted and within this an
- Page 85 and 86:
Organizational Factors Contributing
- Page 87 and 88:
examine and reconcile existing lite
- Page 89 and 90:
Effects of Corporate Social Respons
- Page 91 and 92:
15. Morsing M, & Schultz M. (2006).
- Page 93 and 94:
1989). But if the information avail
- Page 95 and 96:
An Inquiry into Corporate Heritage
- Page 97 and 98:
3. Balmer, J. M. T., & Greyser, S.
- Page 99 and 100:
Research questions and methodology
- Page 101 and 102:
Building Corporate Reputation: A Di
- Page 103 and 104:
Session 3.1 Financial vs. Consumer-
- Page 105 and 106:
For indicating brand equity, one of
- Page 107 and 108:
Financial Brand Valuation: an exper
- Page 109 and 110:
Figure 1 Religiously Motivated Cons
- Page 111 and 112:
I Don‘t Like It! - Understanding
- Page 113 and 114:
Session 3.2 Advertising Agency Empl
- Page 115 and 116:
applications of the Repertory Test
- Page 117 and 118:
The Life Cycle of Mavens Lynne Free
- Page 119 and 120:
Exploring the relationship between
- Page 121 and 122:
internal branding process. Internal
- Page 123 and 124:
proper branding strategy. With the
- Page 125 and 126:
Profiling the Image of Urban Busine
- Page 127 and 128:
Finally, the paper confirms the cau
- Page 129 and 130:
Table 3 Image differences according
- Page 131 and 132:
associated with the brand‖ (Aaker
- Page 133 and 134:
Figure 1 - Number of adjectives sel
- Page 135 and 136:
Figure 5 - Main attributes of a gol
- Page 137 and 138:
Empirical Studies For both studies,
- Page 139 and 140:
Figure 2: Perception of the City of
- Page 141 and 142:
Co-branding places? Andrea Lucarell
- Page 143 and 144:
12. Lucarelli, A., & Berg, P. O. (2
- Page 145 and 146:
the place brands, as has been showe
- Page 147 and 148:
Session 3.4 Innovation and Entrepre
- Page 149 and 150:
The interviews were conducted in th
- Page 151 and 152:
Country-of-Origin Effects on Brand
- Page 153 and 154:
7. Kaynak, E., Kucukemiroglu, O. &
- Page 155 and 156:
Results The demographic profile ind
- Page 157 and 158:
use games consoles (Childwise, 2001
- Page 159 and 160:
Plenary Session 2 Brand Performance
- Page 161 and 162:
Uncles, M.D. & Kwok, S. (2008). Gen
- Page 163 and 164:
Brand Management Framework Empirica
- Page 165 and 166:
Coneptualising Branding in Indian P
- Page 167 and 168:
characteristics could be zeroed upo
- Page 169 and 170:
Concentrating on the actual practic
- Page 171 and 172:
ooking attractive in greater detail
- Page 173 and 174:
Session 7.2 Brand Personification a
- Page 175 and 176:
Importance of Country Image to Mega
- Page 177 and 178:
Table 1: Evaluative Responses for t
- Page 179 and 180:
To be Similar or Unique? Implicatio
- Page 181 and 182:
Brown, T. J., Dacin, P. A., Pratt,
- Page 183 and 184:
A brand-driven strategy oriented to
- Page 185 and 186:
Rheingold, H. (1993). The Virtual C
- Page 187 and 188:
A Framework for Public Sector Brand
- Page 189 and 190:
Conclusion Public sector organisati
- Page 191 and 192:
A strategic investigation into the
- Page 193 and 194:
There are also some changes in term
- Page 195 and 196:
Brand Hypocrisy Sanne Frandsen, Cop
- Page 197 and 198:
Table 1: Empirical Findings Theory
- Page 199 and 200:
Brand Governance in Social Networki
- Page 201 and 202:
Determinants Brand Orientation Va
- Page 203 and 204:
When Individual Experience becomes
- Page 205 and 206: Impact of Storytelling on Consumer
- Page 207 and 208: The Role of Communication in Establ
- Page 209 and 210: Culture‘s Influence on Consumer P
- Page 211 and 212: + Top-Down Dynamic between Luxury F
- Page 213 and 214: Analysis and results We assessed th
- Page 215 and 216: An Exploration of Own Brand Retaile
- Page 217 and 218: 11. ETI 2010. Ethical Trading Initi
- Page 219 and 220: When investigating unique significa
- Page 221 and 222: Session 8.2 Closing the Gaps - the
- Page 223 and 224: accomplishing reality rather than d
- Page 225 and 226: Reddy, 1998, p.40). As a result, br
- Page 227 and 228: Figure 2: Doves Real Beauty Billboa
- Page 229 and 230: Literature review, as a complete re
- Page 231 and 232: Segmenting McDonalds: Measuring Bra
- Page 233 and 234: A simple eyeballing of the segment
- Page 235 and 236: Segment 2 Segment 3 Segment 4 235
- Page 237 and 238: Session 8.3 Brand Attitudes and the
- Page 239 and 240: when preceded with the related conc
- Page 241 and 242: What keeps smokers from quitting? U
- Page 243 and 244: Table 1: Description of the cigaret
- Page 245 and 246: Exploring differences in product at
- Page 247 and 248: Based on the results some general c
- Page 249 and 250: Data was collected by independent j
- Page 251 and 252: Sonic branding: A review of literat
- Page 253 and 254: How is green seen? Exploring the im
- Page 255: were in evidence. The inability to
- Page 259 and 260: How Retail Banks Use Atmosphere to
- Page 261 and 262: Actually, we don‘t feel constrain
- Page 263 and 264: Introduction Reputation and Financi
- Page 265 and 266: Chun, R. & Davies G. (2009). Employ
- Page 267 and 268: Identity, Reputation and Organizati
- Page 269 and 270: Introduction Factors Affecting Bran
- Page 271 and 272: A quiet important approach then bec
- Page 273 and 274: 27. Gentry, C.R., ―Building on Br
- Page 275 and 276: Together these issues have resulted
- Page 277 and 278: elations. If the contact persons tr
- Page 279 and 280: How do you Really Know? Exploring B
- Page 281 and 282: Originality/value The psychology li
- Page 283 and 284: asked ―did you see any of these c
- Page 285 and 286: expressivity (Ω experts = 0,96 p
- Page 287 and 288: Next are brand associations, also r
- Page 289 and 290: Table 1: Selection of variables, it
- Page 291 and 292: Special Session Issues in Brand Gov
- Page 293 and 294: A Competance based Brand: Meaning a
- Page 295 and 296: Session 12.4 Special Session Topic:
- Page 297 and 298: Brand Meaning Co-Creation of Newcom
- Page 299 and 300: Leonor Vacas de Carvalho, Évora Un
- Page 301: Ronaldo Schutz, University of the A