16.06.2013 Views

1. Introduction - Firenze University Press

1. Introduction - Firenze University Press

1. Introduction - Firenze University Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The number of years it would take to consume the suitable rock material msite at a certain location<br />

can be calculated for the sites mentioned above, for a CO2 sequestration rate of <strong>1.</strong>2 Mt/year (as was<br />

the plan with the Fortum / TVO project):<br />

msite<br />

t ( year)<br />

<br />

<br />

m year m<br />

rock /<br />

m<br />

m_rock / m_CO 2<br />

(kg/kg)<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

rock<br />

CO2<br />

(4)<br />

where mrock/mCO2 (kg(kg) is given by (3).<br />

6. Feasibility of the considered deposits for Meri-Pori CO2<br />

6.1 – Hitura mine rock<br />

As noted in section 4.2, the rock available at Hitura has a theoretical capacity to sequester more<br />

than 400 Mt CO2. Figure 3 shows the amount of rock needed to carbonate 1 t CO2 as a function of<br />

Mg extraction, for full and partial (65%) carbonation extent. With Mg(OH)2 production levels of the<br />

order of 65- 70% obtained for the rock processing according to Nduagu et al., the process would<br />

require ~ 5 ton rock / ton CO2 and could sequester <strong>1.</strong>2 Mt CO2/y during a period of ~150 years with<br />

65% Mg/OH) carbonation. According to Romão et al. [17] - see also Table 1 – the heat<br />

requirements would be ~ 6 GJ/t CO2 which can be reduced somewhat by heat integration. It would<br />

be reduced to ~ 4 GJ/t CO2 if extraction and carbonation levels > 90% can be realised.<br />

100% Mg(OH) 2 carbonatio n<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 <strong>1.</strong>00<br />

Mg(OH) 2extraction from rock Mg (-)<br />

m<br />

m<br />

site<br />

CO2<br />

<br />

m<br />

/ year<br />

m<br />

450<br />

400<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

rock<br />

CO2<br />

operaration for <strong>1.</strong>2 Mt CO 2 / y ear<br />

(years)<br />

92<br />

m_rock / m_CO 2<br />

(kg /kg)<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

65% Mg(OH) 2 carbonation<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 <strong>1.</strong>00<br />

Mg(O H) 2 extraction from rock Mg (-)<br />

Fig. 3 Rock consumption rate and availability at Hitura depending on extraction of Mg from the<br />

rock, for full (left) or partial (right) carbonation of the Mg(OH)2 produced.<br />

The distance of around 300 km from Meri-Pori to the Hitura site would add a few €/t (on-shore<br />

pipeline) transport costs to this CCS option, making a site like Stormi-Vammala more attractive.<br />

6.2 – Vammala (Stormi-Vammala) nickel mine rock<br />

As presented in section 4.3, the rock available at Stormi-Vammala has a theoretical capacity to<br />

sequester ~50 Mt CO2. Figure 4 shows the amount of rock needed to carbonate 1 t CO2 as a<br />

function of Mg extraction, for full and partial (65%) carbonation extent. With Mg(OH)2 production<br />

levels of ~ 25% obtained for the rock processing [35] the process would require ~ 12 ton rock / ton<br />

CO2 and could fix <strong>1.</strong>2 Mt/y during a period of < 10 years only, with 65% Mg(OH)2 carbonation.<br />

The heat requirements would be in the range of 4.5 – 20 GJ/t CO2 depending on whether nonreactive<br />

material behaves as inert or not. These values can be reduced somewhat by heat integration<br />

but the most urgent need for improvement is the extraction of Mg and producing more Mg(OH)2<br />

from the rock material. With the current result the contribution of crushing and grinding the rock<br />

m<br />

site<br />

<strong>1.</strong><br />

2 Mt CO / year<br />

2<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

operaration for <strong>1.</strong>2 Mt CO 2 / year<br />

(years)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!