16.06.2013 Views

1. Introduction - Firenze University Press

1. Introduction - Firenze University Press

1. Introduction - Firenze University Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Gross electric power kW 244619. 244962.<br />

CHP plant efficiency % 57.13 57.19<br />

Results of performed analysis show that the efficiency of the CHP plant is only slightly influenced<br />

by the way of regulation. By-pass regulation provides higher electric power by <strong>1.</strong>4 per mill and<br />

efficiency by 0.06 percentage point higher than that obtained when using throttling.<br />

This kind of regulation is also used in the second variant.<br />

4. Modernization of the power plant after its integration with a CO2<br />

capture facility<br />

A CHP plant will need to be modernized after being coupled with a CO2 capture unit. This problem<br />

is covered in [3 - 6]. It concerns especially turbine, regeneration system and condensers cooling [3 -<br />

5]. Therefore, machinery and utilities of such a plant should be chosen appropriately during the<br />

design stage taking those changes into consideration. Considered structure (first variant) of a CHP<br />

plant was chosen in the way that will reduce required after the integration changes as much as<br />

possible. In fact, they are limited to the low pressure turbine, which will be mostly affected by<br />

changed operation conditions.<br />

5. Conclusions and remarks<br />

Aim of this work was a design of a CHP plant structure, that will meet the requirements of the UE<br />

Parliament and Council directive UE 2001/80/WE.<br />

Presented structure of a “capture ready” CHP plant will work with possibly high efficiency before<br />

and after the integration with a CO2 capture unit, providing costs of modernization to be low as<br />

possible.<br />

By decreasing the sorbents energy consumption by 1 MJ/CO2 one can raise the efficiency by ca. 2<br />

percentage points.<br />

Peak power of the heating unit is limited by the sorbents energy consumption rate.<br />

Calculation results show that the heating unit regulation method does not affect the plants efficiency<br />

significantly.<br />

Performed analysis includes only the sorbents energy consumption rate and omits other auxiliary<br />

power needs.<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

The results presented in this paper were obtained from research work co-financed by the National<br />

Centre of Research and Development in the framework of Contract SP/E/1/67484/10 – „Strategic<br />

Research Programme – Advanced Technologies for obtaining energy: Development of a technology<br />

for highly efficient zero-emission coal-fired Power units integrated with CO 2 capture”.<br />

References<br />

[1] Duan L., Zhao M., Xu G., Yang Y.: Integration and optimization on the coal fired power plant<br />

with CO2 capture using MEA. 24 th International Conference ECOS 2011, Novy Sad, 4-<br />

7.07.2011, Conference papers, p. 582-593.<br />

[2] Abu-Zahra M.R.M., Schneiders L.H.J., Niederer J.P.M., Feron P.H.M., Versteeg G.F., CO2<br />

capture from power plants. A parametric study of the technical performance based on<br />

monoethanolamine. Part I. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2007; p. 47-46<br />

[3] IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme (IEA GHG), “CO2 capture ready plants”, 2007/4, May<br />

2007.<br />

[4] Lucquiaud M., Chalmers H., Gibbins J.: Capture-ready supercritical coal-fired power plants and<br />

flexible post-combustion CO2 capture. Energy Procedia 1(2009), p. 1411-1418.<br />

143

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!